So u consider a guy with a 74-77 career college record as a coach a really good to great coach? Lolol
To add he also had another two losing seasons in the NFL on top of that?
Mmmm I don't know, seems to me NU would be looking for a better quality coach then a sub .500 one at every level he has coached..
you silly goof. you can't ask for someone whose first 40% of their tenure was bad before turning it around, then get mad when their overall record isn't that great.
let's look at his overall record after the first 4 years, when he comfortably had his team built:
2005) 7-5
2006) 11-2
2007) 8-5
2008) 8-5
2009) 9-4
2010) 4-8
2011) 9-4
total: 56-33, winning % of 0.629. made a bowl game in 6 of 7 years, went 5-1 in them. in fact, he's only a few games away from becoming the winningest coach of all time at Rutgers.
So that's a fail, now show me some more examples of really good coaches that started off w 4 losing seasosin at th p5 lvl..
I will wait patiently.
nope, I presented you with evidence. you being too ignorant to accept it is not my problem.
is he Nick Saban (another guy who failed in the NFL lol)? no, but don't move the goalposts just cuz you're embarrassed. nobody who unironically says "fail" feels confident in what they just said, and it makes it hard to discern whether you're 13 or 73.
just call it how it is, there is no amount of evidence that will sway you, I'm fine with disagreeing. there are a plethora of coaches that struggled in their first 5 years of taking over a dumpster fire (I'm not going to pretend that finishing 6-6 is worlds different from 5-7, that's your fantasy land) then got things together to have success. I'm sure it took guys like Mark Mangino and Mark Stoops a good while. took Brian Kelly 6 years to start having the success Notre Dame expected, he then proceeded to go 4-8 the following year.