Its hard to tell sometimes when going through these threadsThat response from me that you're quoting was sarcasm directed at the resident smooth brain.
You can actually name a starter and still see both qbs performance in game conditions. You simply play them both. To think after Spring ball and this fall ball and you're just a couple days from game time and you can't figure out who your quarterback is? Inexcusable and incompetent. Or brilliance. I think the former.Or Lester and Kirk want to see both qbs perform in game conditions against NIU. Yawn
It will be alrightYou can actually name a starter and still see both qbs performance in game conditions. You simply play them both. To think after Spring ball and this fall ball and you're just a couple days from game time and you can't figure out who your quarterback is? Inexcusable and incompetent. Or brilliance. I think the former.
Explain to me how naming a starter fundamentally changes the equation, particularly if both QBs are going to play anyway. Or at the least, explain how not doing so rises from something that might represent a fair difference of opinion to something that is “inexcusable and incompetent.”You can actually name a starter and still see both qbs performance in game conditions. You simply play them both. To think after Spring ball and this fall ball and you're just a couple days from game time and you can't figure out who your quarterback is? Inexcusable and incompetent. Or brilliance. I think the former.
Team unity so they can rally around a starter. Projecting confidence in your coaches and system. Projecting strength, confidence, and strong decision making to opponents, fans, the team. All can suffer when you are so lilly-livered after almost a year you still can't make a decision. KF is so boring and risk averse he craps tan colored crap and comes across as a weak knee spineless old man. Jesus man, you are the head coach, make a decision after almost a year. Waiting THREE more days is going to decide it? How laughable and almost embarassing.Explain to me how naming a starter fundamentally changes the equation, particularly if both QBs are going to play anyway. Or at the least, explain how not doing so rises from something that might represent a fair difference of opinion to something that is “inexcusable and incompetent.”
Ok coach, apply for the job, you can replace Phil or Kirk in 27Team unity so they can rally around a starter. Projecting confidence in your coaches and system. Projecting strength, confidence, and strong decision making to opponents, fans, the team. All can suffer when you are so lilly-livered after almost a year you still can't make a decision. KF is so boring and risk averse he craps tan colored crap and comes across as a weak knee spineless old man. Jesus man, you are the head coach, make a decision after almost a year. Waiting THREE more days is going to decide it? How laughable and almost embarassing.
Meanwhile, NIU hasn't named a starter. We'll prolly smoke them on team unity alone, I reckon.Team unity so they can rally around a starter. Projecting confidence in your coaches and system. Projecting strength, confidence, and strong decision making to opponents, fans, the team. All can suffer when you are so lilly-livered after almost a year you still can't make a decision. KF is so boring and risk averse he craps tan colored crap and comes across as a weak knee spineless old man. Jesus man, you are the head coach, make a decision after almost a year. Waiting THREE more days is going to decide it? How laughable and almost embarassing.
Explain to me how naming a starter fundamentally changes the equation, particularly if both QBs are going to play anyway. Or at the least, explain how not doing so rises from something that might represent a fair difference of opinion to something that is “inexcusable and incompetent.”
Hahaha. Get those witty retorts from your 4th grade daughter? Good job cletus!Ok coach, apply for the job, you can replace Phil or Kirk in 27
i know you earned three letters in Tiddlywinks back in middle school
I'd hope so. In the meantime... Tan Flavored Kirk can try and figure out, after working on it for almost a year, who can play qb. What a joke.Meanwhile, NIU hasn't named a starter. We'll prolly smoke them on team unity alone, I reckon.
Apparently, they were both elected to the leadership council.Team unity so they can rally around a starter.
keep telling us about your experiences with team dynamics , I know hop scotch prepared you wellHahaha. Get those witty retorts from your 4th grade daughter? Good job cletus!
Never said I had experience w team dynamics cletus... just said a team with a defined leader can be a benefit to one without. Better reading comprehensive will be your friend if you just give it a chance. And keep chatting with your 4th grader for those witty comebacks... you're killing it ! Good job!keep telling us about your experiences with team dynamics , I know hop scotch prepared you well
Stick to baking and washing dishesNever said I had experience w team dynamics cletus... just said a team with a defined leader can be a benefit to one without. Better reading comprehensive will be your friend if you just give it a chance. And keep chatting with your 4th grader for those witty comebacks... you're killing it ! Good job!![]()
Stick to talking about tiddlywinks and hopscotch. And giving us some more fourth grade wit. You're not dating yourself there old timer...Stick to baking and washing dishes
Clemson named their starting QB...yesterday. And...said the second-string guy will also play. Now THAT is "team unity"!I'd hope so. In the meantime... Tan Flavored Kirk can try and figure out, after working on it for almost a year, who can play qb. What a joke.
don't stop now, make sure you complain about DJ and Winter as well!All the discussion around QB is to be expected - but a walk on starting at DT is a potentially scary scenario. It might be fine, but it certainly raises concern around depth. Buckle up…!!
The last 10 years should have taught everyone that defense belongs at the low end of the worry list. It might not be elite, but I'd be really surprised it wasn't still a top 25 unit.All the discussion around QB is to be expected - but a walk on starting at DT is a potentially scary scenario. It might be fine, but it certainly raises concern around depth. Buckle up…!!
A former walk on who played significant snaps last year, and has been a Hawk for 4-5 years now? So, have we ever seen a former walk on excell at Iowa? Maybe that fact that he actually played last year, and has 4 years in the system gives him a slight nod to line up next to Hawthorne, Add to that they've already said they plan to rotate at least 4 or more DT's early on, and it will probably be okay.All the discussion around QB is to be expected - but a walk on starting at DT is a potentially scary scenario. It might be fine, but it certainly raises concern around depth. Buckle up…!!
Exactly. Or run through a long list of former walk ONS at Iowa who have become all conference players and pro's.don't stop now, make sure you complain about DJ and Winter as well!
I'd hope so. In the meantime... Tan Flavored Kirk can try and figure out, after working on it for almost a year, who can play qb. What a joke.
Dallas Clark was a walk on….. Sean Considine…. Joe Evans….Iowa has a rich history of walkon successAll the discussion around QB is to be expected - but a walk on starting at DT is a potentially scary scenario. It might be fine, but it certainly raises concern around depth. Buckle up…!!
5 years as a walk on is different than starting as a walk on and earning a scholly shortly thereafter....Dallas Clark was a walk on….. Sean Considine…. Joe Evans….Iowa has a rich history of walkon success
I get your point…… not sure why he was never awarded a scholarship….. could be with NIL he doesn’t need one….. but if the kid is starting as a walkon I’m going to guess he’s a gritty dude that plays his heart out5 years as a walk on is different than starting as a walk on and earning a scholly shortly thereafter....
I have no doubt he plays his heart out....he wouldn't be a Hawkeye if he didn't. My biggest concern is the fact that we have 2 walk-ons in the 2 deeps at DT. For a B1G school that has designs for the CFP, that has to be fixed going forward. I read somewhere, can't remember where, that the biggest separator between the teams that make the CFP and those that just miss out, is play on the DL. More than QB. Hopefully it's just a one-year outlier as we get younger guys ramped up and find a guy or two in the portal.I get your point…… not sure why he was never awarded a scholarship….. could be with NIL he doesn’t need one….. but if the kid is starting as a walkon I’m going to guess he’s a gritty dude that plays his heart out
Did you watch football last year? Or brain dead?They were neck and neck in practice. The scrimmage should have the deciding factor. I assume this is an old geezer rewarding seniority coupled with risk aversion. Cignetti wasn’t into risk aversion and that is why he has a title.
Idiots can’t figure out Indiana has a 32 million dollar roster and Iowa can only afford less than half of that. Iowas NIL is the bottom tier of the BIG, KF has them punching way above their weight.Did you watch football last year? Or brain dead?
KF took a big risk paying for an injured QB that needed surgery. Paid MG enough for him to pay his own surgery. Then stuck with him all season because the other two weren't ready.
Cignetti just buys one of the best QBs in the portal cuz they got the money. That's what the big boys do. It's their path. Works great when you got the money. Just ask Miami.