Indndawg, you're correct!
However, I'm not surprised, I'm amazed at the number of Mississippi State supporters that will continue to stay behind a coach that is clearly not getting the job done and rationalizing losing all at the same time.
But giving this guy a fair chance is somehow different than rationalizing what happened the last half of the last coach's career here? Amazement goes both ways, I guess.
The number of people/posters that actually think this program should have another season under this leadership, while some also acknowledge that it probably won't be any better next year is astonishing.
You don't fire a guy for making a drastic improvement. While still very injured. Is he a year behind where he should be? Sure he is. Doesn't make it a fireable offense at this point in time. Healthy -- we win both of the last 2 games. But your agenda becomes clear later in the post anyway, so I already know you don't want to hear it.
Do you realize we are losing over $1 million per year in basketball as each year ticks by with this bottom feeder train wreck? And yes, the program was making money under Rick Stansbury, regardless of your opinion of him.
Why do people insist on make-believe hyperbole in attempt to make a point? You lost all semblance of credibility with this BS you just made up.
Year BB Expenses BB Revenue Net
2010 4052623 6914565 2861942
2011 5430979 7002963 1571984
2012 4312955 6744710 2431755
2013 4377759 6571274 2193515
Stansbury's last 2 - Net $4,433,926
Ray's first 2 - Net $4,625,270
http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/
I would like to know how many of you are actually season ticket holders and have been for the last several years?
Why do you have such low standards for guys like Rick Ray and Sylvester Croom but some of you talk about other programs (outside of Mississippi State) and how they won't tolerate such failures for long?
First you are talking smack about people not buying tickets(lost revenue). Now you are mad at them for "tolerating" coaches and thus showing up. You are angry about people tolerating his rebuild on the floor -- while you were perfectly happy tolerating NIT runs with sweet 16 talent.
Meanwhile you don't hold our program(s) and/or coaches (university employees) to a similar standard of excellence? And don't tell me it takes four or five years to build a program because that is total BS. A good floor coach and recruiter would have shown reasonable to significant progress in year three (we clearly don't have either).
We have shown both -- and if not for injuries would be gearing up for the postseason right now. I get it -- injuries are part of it -- and when you've been injured for 3 years, at some point, that too is on the coach.
Some folks need to make up their mind where your loyalty is: Mississippi State or a coach that is an employee of the university!
Yeah -- everyone here has an agenda to side with Rick Ray over Mississippi State. While you're probably wearing your aTm hat**
Coaches come and go and there has only been two (big three sports) in my lifetime that could say they were truly one of us.
It's time for a change in basketball leadership NOW, in order to move the standards meter out of the legion of mediocrity.
Play the #18 team in the country to a 4 point game without your starting point guard(or a point guard period if we're being honest) and without what was likely to be your starting PF for the season -- FIRE EVERYBODY.**
Ray is going to get next year. He deserves next year -- and even the most agenda-driven of you can see just how close he is to winning at a pretty high clip in a much-improved SEC. We've got every chance in the world to go dancing next year. If we don't -- then everyone here will be ready to talk about going another direction.
Another irony -- the pro-Stansbury crowd always doubted our ability to hire a coach. They view the Ray hiring as proving them correct and have boasted about it pretty continuously since the hire was announced. Now, those same people want us to pull the plug on a coach with a drastically improved team in year 3, with alot coming back and alot coming in, in order to restart the same process they belabored from the get-go. So, whose expectations are actually out of whack here? And who is moving the goalposts?