LOCKED - He's Done.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,201
7,084
113
Agreed, and he's really the only one at this point. There's a lot to be excited about when it comes to Weatherspoon and Brown, but truthfully, anyone expecting them to come in and immediately make significant contributions as freshmen is most likely going to be disappointed. I can easily see Tookie redshirting, and then I think that 8-12 minutes a game out of Weatherspoon is about the most we'll see.
 

msstate7

Redshirt
Nov 27, 2008
10,388
10
38
Agreed, and he's really the only one at this point. There's a lot to be excited about when it comes to Weatherspoon and Brown, but truthfully, anyone expecting them to come in and immediately make significant contributions as freshmen is most likely going to be disappointed. I can easily see Tookie redshirting, and then I think that 8-12 minutes a game out of Weatherspoon is about the most we'll see.

Tookie will upgrade bloodman. Weatherspoon will play
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,757
92
48
Agreed, and he's really the only one at this point. There's a lot to be excited about when it comes to Weatherspoon and Brown, but truthfully, anyone expecting them to come in and immediately make significant contributions as freshmen is most likely going to be disappointed. I can easily see Tookie redshirting, and then I think that 8-12 minutes a game out of Weatherspoon is about the most we'll see.

Zero chance Tookie redshirts. We would have one(injury-prone) point guard actually playing in that situation, with nothing at all behind Ready. Tookie is going to play and play alot. Whether he's ready or not...

FWIW, he dropped 33 last night to advance in the playoffs and went over 3000 points for his high school career. Simonds dropped 40 in an L directly after dropping 33 including a walk-off buzzer beater earlier this week. These guys coming up are grabbing very different headlines than the ones we signed in the first couple of classes...

Tookie takes all of Bloodman's minutes and quite possibly a couple more.
Zuppardo takes most of Roq's minutes. Although he's more of a stretch 4. Or, if Black matures, he can play the 3.
Weatherspoon gets time at the 2. That spot is crowded, but he is seemingly more well-rounded than Sword or Thomas.
Strugg probably does redshirt.

So, our "second string" next year:
1 - Tookie
2 - Thomas/Weatherspoon
3 - Houston
4 - Black
5 - Ndoye

Then, in 2016, we're looking at:
1 - Ready(sr), Tookie(so)
2 - Weatherspoon(so), Simonds(fr) who is actually more of a combo guard, Dunlap(so)
3 - Houston(jr),
4 - Zuppardo(sr) who is really a big 3/stretch 4, Black(jr), Strugg(fr), Hicks(fr)
5 - Ndoye(jr)

We will most likely be adding 2 more guys in the 2016 class as well... probably a 3 and a center. I know we're still chasing Nick Marshall that committed to Memphis.
 
Last edited:

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,757
92
48
Nothing to do with Stansbury but Ray aint Jay Ladner either in running an offense. We all know we will see next year so let's see who was right. So far you guys who were adamant we needed change are showing your brilliance. Be careful what you wish for, you got it and now an NIT bid is your ceiling.

You make it about Stansbury every time you post your agenda. Which is every time you post on basketball period. You are no different than the C34 you are constantly bitching about. You've made yourself the ying to his yang.

"NIT bid is 'your' ceiling." -- so you admit you aren't actually an MSU fan anymore? The NIT is not "my" ceiling and never will be. You are seriously arguing that there is absolute zero chance that we go dancing next year?
 

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,201
7,084
113
Fair enough, but my concerns with him don't have anything to do with the offensive side of the ball. It would have more to do with a 5'11"(at best) freshman PG trying to defend SEC guards. He's already the smallest guy on the court in all of his HS video highlights, and he's about to be going up against guys a lot bigger than that beginning next year.
I mean... it's do or die time next season for Ray, so I'll give it to you that you're probably right that he won't end up redshirting, but I just don't see him getting big minutes.
 

Salty Sands Dawg

Redshirt
Aug 25, 2012
291
0
0
Engie,
Thanks for disecting my post to make your point with some facts and some assumptions. With all due respect, I will reply accordingly:

"But giving this guy a fair chance is somehow different than rationalizing what happened the last half of the last coach's career here? Amazement goes both ways, I guess.

He has been given a fair chance for three years now. As for the previous coach, my post(s) has nothing to do with the last staff but where the program is TODAY and where it is going TOMORROW.

"You don't fire a guy for making a drastic improvement. While still very injured. Is he a year behind where he should be? Sure he is. Doesn't make it a fireable offense at this point in time. Healthy -- we win both of the last 2 games. But your agenda becomes clear later in the post anyway, so I already know you don't want to hear it."

What "drastic improvements" are you citing, it certainly is not in recruiting/developing talent, offensive and defensive stats or the wins/loss column!
12/13 10-22, 4-14
13/14 14-19, 3-15
14/15 12-15, 5-9 (to date)
By my standards, that record(s) does not show any sign of improvement that is going to secure post season play of ANY kind!
"Healthy -- we win both of the last 2 games" possibly but the fact is we still lost both games. So your point about injuries is not relevant unless you are trying to rationalize losing.


"Why do people insist on make-believe hyperbole in attempt to make a point? You lost all semblance of credibility with this BS you just made up.

Year BB Expenses BB Revenue Net
2010 4052623 6914565 2861942
2011 5430979 7002963 1571984
2012 4312955 6744710 2431755
2013 4377759 6571274 2193515

Stansbury's last 2 - Net $4,433,926
Ray's first 2 - Net $4,625,270

http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/"

Thanks for sharing these gospel financial reports. I'm sure they are calculated the same way Scott Stricklin records attendance (surely you know how that is done)!
Understanding that, I'm also sure the financials are improved due to television, Addidas and others but I doubt very seriously they include the loss incured for giving away free beverage and food in an effort to get students to come to the games free of charge (as well), the loss of Bulldog Club contributions to basketball and the the drop in season ticket sales! So to that end, the net numbers would be that much better if our program was not in the abysmal position it is. Therefore, your point does not disprove anything I said or discredit me!


"First you are talking smack about people not buying tickets(lost revenue). Now you are mad at them for "tolerating" coaches and thus showing up. You are angry about people tolerating his rebuild on the floor -- while you were perfectly happy tolerating NIT runs with sweet 16 talent."

Nice assumption, I don't recall "talking smack" about people not buying tickets. I simply asked a general question of those who post here about how many buy season tickets and have been for the last several years.
I also asked a separate but again general question about those who are comfortable with poor/mediocre standards for Mississippi State but cite other schools/programs and how "they" would not tolerate similar failures.
I don't recall ever making a statement about being happy with any season(s) performance that did not land Mississippi State in the NCAA tournament (basketball or baseball).


"We have shown both -- and if not for injuries would be gearing up for the postseason right now. I get it -- injuries are part of it -- and when you've been injured for 3 years, at some point, that too is on the coach."

Again, the facts are we are NOT gearing up for the postseason and have not for three seasons (now). You seem to be rationalizing losing with the injury bug. How about citing the talent/development (or lack there of) and the excellent coaching job that has occured over the last three years, including the last two games?

"Yeah -- everyone here has an agenda to side with Rick Ray over Mississippi State. While you're probably wearing your aTm hat**"

Thanks for the compliment, I'm a fourth generation graduate of Mississippi State. My loyalty is to Mississippi State, not a coach!

"Play the #18 team in the country to a 4 point game without your starting point guard(or a point guard period if we're being honest) and without what was likely to be your starting PF for the season -- FIRE EVERYBODY.**"

Rationalizing losing again. "FIRE EVERYBODY",no just one person, it will be up to the next coach to determine who will be on his staff. Hopefully, that individual will be an SEC caliber coach!

"Ray is going to get next year." That's certainly possible.
"He deserves next year -- and even the most agenda-driven of you can see just how close he is to winning at a pretty high clip in a much-improved SEC."
You are certainly entitled to your opinion (which I and many others do not share) but your point is clearly up for debate. Isn't that part of what this message board/thread is about?
"We've got every chance in the world to go dancing next year. If we don't -- then everyone here will be ready to talk about going another direction." Again, that's your opinion and I appreciate your optimism. As for "everyone here will be ready to talk about going another direction" in case you haven't noticed many are already at that point.

"Another irony -- the pro-Stansbury crowd always doubted our ability to hire a coach. They view the Ray hiring as proving them correct and have boasted about it pretty continuously since the hire was announced. Now, those same people want us to pull the plug on a coach with a drastically improved team in year 3, with alot coming back and alot coming in, in order to restart the same process they belabored from the get-go. So, whose expectations are actually out of whack here? And who is moving the goalposts?"

Well since YOU brought up the post-Stansbury world, Stricklin did go through multiple candidates before he found someone to take the job! Although, that is water under the bridge now, the the crowd you speak of may have been right at the time. Now back to MY point in my post which has nothing to do with Rick Stansbury, it is about where the program is TODAY! Again, your view and my view of improvement appear to be radically different from one another, along with where we go from here!

Engie, let me ask you this, do you really think Rick Ray is an SEC caliber head coach that has the ability and is capable of being the person to lead and build Mississippi State's Basketball program into a consistent SEC and NCAA program winner?
 
Last edited:

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
This is no more about Stansbury than your denial of what we have now. We have no chance with this coach and his offense to go dancing , so , I said it. Now, I hope he proves me wrong but anybody who really loves MSU knows we are no where near where we were even 3 years ago. Those are the real MSU fans who ponied up for decades and saw us become relevant only to see it destroyed by an incompetent hire. You and your buddies pushed for it and got it. So who has done the most damage. I think most folks are smart enough to see what has transpired.


You make it about Stansbury every time you post your agenda. Which is every time you post on basketball period. You are no different than the C34 you are constantly bitching about. You've made yourself the ying to his yang.

"NIT bid is 'your' ceiling." -- so you admit you aren't actually an MSU fan anymore? The NIT is not "my" ceiling and never will be. You are seriously arguing that there is absolute zero chance that we go dancing next year?
 

msstate7

Redshirt
Nov 27, 2008
10,388
10
38
This is no more about Stansbury than your denial of what we have now. We have no chance with this coach and his offense to go dancing , so , I said it. Now, I hope he proves me wrong but anybody who really loves MSU knows we are no where near where we were even 3 years ago. Those are the real MSU fans who ponied up for decades and saw us become relevant only to see it destroyed by an incompetent hire. You and your buddies pushed for it and got it. So who has done the most damage. I think most folks are smart enough to see what has transpired.

So if you support ray, you're not a "real MSU fan"? It seems to me that your "real MSU fans" have let your love of a coach come ahead of your love of the university.

I'm not anti- stansbury. I loved stansbury and pulled for him till the day he let go. Stansbury had lost control of his program though. It was time. Ray may or may not be able to win at the level he needs to, but he's already cleaned up the program. If Ray fails next season, the next coach will have an easier job than ray inherited imo.
 

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
Nobody said if you support Ray, you are not a MSU fan. Stansbury had no more lost control of the program than Ray is the answer. Sydney was the undloing of Stansbury and everybody including him knew it. Did it justify the change? History has shown it was a bad decision. All the crap Coach34 and his guys spewed was just that. I guess Kennedy has lost control of his program too when he had some suspensions but he is kicking our *** now. Henderson smoked more dope than all our players combined and yet, his program is in control. I think your wanting to think Scott was right has tarnished your views and I simply replied to SaltyDawg because everything he said was correct. All this other diatribe is just that. Won't change anything but meanwhile, we will have another losing season, Kentucky will bring more fans than us this Wednesday and you folks will keep bragging about playing hard in another defeat. Waiting a year will only delay the inevitable.


So if you support ray, you're not a "real MSU fan"? It seems to me that your "real MSU fans" have let your love of a coach come ahead of your love of the university.

I'm not anti- stansbury. I loved stansbury and pulled for him till the day he let go. Stansbury had lost control of his program though. It was time. Ray may or may not be able to win at the level he needs to, but he's already cleaned up the program. If Ray fails next season, the next coach will have an easier job than ray inherited imo.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,757
92
48
Nobody said if you support Ray, you are not a MSU fan.
Yes -- you basically did say that.

Stansbury had no more lost control of the program than Ray is the answer. Sydney was the undloing of Stansbury and everybody including him knew it.
Who is Sydney?
Free passes for Augustus, Rayvern, Bost, etc I see. But at least we ran off Phil Turner**

Did it justify the change? History has shown it was a bad decision.
No it hasn't. 3 years is not history. Paul Gregory should have gotten a lifetime contract here in your mind? Ah -- that history tells a different story doesn't it. At some point, legitimately going dancing once in 7 years, after making ?4 or 5? in a row, with public embarrassment that went WAY beyond Sidney is NOT enough. Nevermind what the coach before him did here.

Polk actually did, in essence, get a lifetime contract here -- to make us the SECOND WORST SEC team for the 2000 decade. That was the same fans you are championing's doing. Not the ones you are bitching about. But you were perfectly OK making the field of 64 every year, right? No need to aspire for more -- especially when you'd already had 2 coaches prove that we could achieve more. So, we'll mark you in favor of a lifetime contract for Polk as well.

All the crap Coach34 and his guys spewed was just that. I guess Kennedy has lost control of his program too when he had some suspensions but he is kicking our *** now.
You would have LONG SINCE championed firing Kennedy if he was our coach -- with an "NIT ceiling". How long before he made the first NCAA tourney? Yeahhhhh -- that would have satisfied you here. You'd have been raising just as much hell as you have on Ray -- or anyone else whose last name wasn't Stansbury -- who you were fine with an NIT ceiling with 4 NBA talents starting.

Henderson smoked more dope than all our players combined and yet, his program is in control.
So, it's only about smoking dope now? THAT is all the Stansbury players were doing? LOL. The majority of the issues people took with them didn't have crap to do with drugs -- which were a symptom rather than the actual problem.

I think your wanting to think Scott was right has tarnished your views and I simply replied to SaltyDawg because everything he said was correct. All this other diatribe is just that. Won't change anything but meanwhile, we will have another losing season, Kentucky will bring more fans than us this Wednesday and you folks will keep bragging about playing hard in another defeat. Waiting a year will only delay the inevitable.
Want to give the last guy 8-10 years to get it going again -- unwilling to let the new guy finish his 3rd year. Yeah -- you don't have an agenda here**
 
Last edited:

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,757
92
48
Engie, let me ask you this, do you really think Rick Ray is an SEC caliber head coach that has the ability and is capable of being the person to lead and build Mississippi State's Basketball program into a consistent SEC and NCAA program winner?

I've seen nothing to prove that he can't be. He's a year behind the logical schedule of where I'd hoped and thought he should be when hired. John Cohen was 2 years behind schedule -- and truth be told -- still doesn't have the program fully built to our true ceiling here.

If Ray doesn't live up to the billing next year -- we can fire him. You can't fire him with the clear improvement on the court being seen so far -- and denying that it exists is ridiculous. Debating whether it's just the natural accumulation of experience is fair. Is it where we want to be? No. But it's closer than it was. As long as improvement is being made, he gets to stay. When there's clear regression -- time to go. As of today, we're a much improved team on the court -- and a much improved team in recruiting.

On the money -- you did exactly what I expected you to do. Must be cooked books!!1!1**
 

jmac.sixpack

Redshirt
Apr 12, 2012
61
0
0
Yes -- you basically did say that.


Who is Sydney?
Free passes for Augustus, Rayvern, Bost, etc I see. But at least we ran off Phil Turner**

Augustus, Rayvern, Bost, and Moultrie would beat the crap out of our existing team. People would actually go to the Hump to watch them play.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,757
92
48
Augustus, Rayvern, Bost, and Moultrie would beat the crap out of our existing team. People would actually go to the Hump to watch them play.

Nice of you to add Moultrie in there when he wasn't mentioned and didn't have a discipline problem. Want to go ahead and name a Stansbury dream team of players that never played together and compare them to the single current squad? Contrary to dawggeezer's purposeful skew, IDGAF if they smoke or not. That was a symptom not the problem. There was a million other symptoms as well. And they pointed to the real problem that wasn't getting better, but was getting tremendously worse.
 

Salty Sands Dawg

Redshirt
Aug 25, 2012
291
0
0
I've seen nothing to prove that he can't be. He's a year behind the logical schedule of where I'd hoped and thought he should be when hired. John Cohen was 2 years behind schedule -- and truth be told -- still doesn't have the program fully built to our true ceiling here.

If Ray doesn't live up to the billing next year -- we can fire him. You can't fire him with the clear improvement on the court being seen so far -- and denying that it exists is ridiculous. Debating whether it's just the natural accumulation of experience is fair. Is it where we want to be? No. But it's closer than it was. As long as improvement is being made, he gets to stay. When there's clear regression -- time to go. As of today, we're a much improved team on the court -- and a much improved team in recruiting.

On the money -- you did exactly what I expected you to do. Must be cooked books!!1!1**

I've seen nothing to prove that he can't be.
I appreciate your opinion. I've seen nothing in three seasons that says he is. Therefore, we can agree to disagree!

You can't fire him with the clear improvement on the court being seen so far -- and denying that it exists is ridiculous.
Please tell me what "clear improvement" you are talking about because it is not in any of the things I cited in my previous response to you?
BTW, when the same so called improvement (not sure what that is since you have not cited anything) happens next year and the record is analogous to what has been over the last three years and another year passes without postseason play, how are you going to justify firing Rick Ray when "Clear Improvement" is still being made (your words and assessment, not mine)?

On the money -- you did exactly what I expected you to do. Must be cooked books!!1!1
I don't recall saying anyone "cooked books". Again, you seem to have a bad habit of making assumptions. I said the way those numbers are calculated did not factor in the three specific things I cited to you (right or wrong)!
Are you going to tell me that over the last three years we have not experienced a significant drop in season ticket sales, Bulldog Club contributions to Basketball and have been giving away free beverage and food at games! YES OR NO?
You know damn well all are true, therefore it is revenue LOST!
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
36
I

I've seen nothing to prove that he can't be.QUOTE]

completely disagree there. Our teams TOTAL inability and ignorance on attacking a press is just one thing, off the top of my head. I could name at least 2-3 other, basic basketball fundamentals that we seems to miss.
 

BiscuitEater

Redshirt
Aug 29, 2009
4,178
0
36
Prairie ...

What the school has control of is trying to get some fans in the seats to help with the atmosphere. Atmosphere is big with any sport but huge in basketball. It amazes me very little is being done to fill the seats. I have sat in my seats this year and literally less than 500 people in the Hump to cheer this team on. That is a reflection of the product on the floor, but the school can do things to put butts in seats. It just isnt happening.

Sorry, but I have to disagree. They are actually doing MUCH more this year to get folks in the seats, especially students. They have reached out to the frats and sororities plus the rest of the students. They have had promotions and concession specials. They have also reached out to local area groups.

The ONE AND ONLY FACTOR THAT IS IMPACTING ATTENDANCE ... IS THE TEAM MSU IS PUTTING ON THE FLOOR ... PERIOD

This is easily proved by simply looking at the ACTUAL attendance of the Men's and Women's teams. One is abysmal while the Women's team is breaking EVERY RECORD IN THE HISTORY OF MSU.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
16,097
5,909
113
Nothing to do with Stansbury but Ray aint Jay Ladner either in running an offense. We all know we will see next year so let's see who was right. So far you guys who were adamant we needed change are showing your brilliance. Be careful what you wish for, you got it and now an NIT bid is your ceiling.

I didn't realize any of the posters here got to choose the new coach. That's the only way their brilliance could be shown. Otherwise, it would mean you are arguing that a desire for change = taking responsibility for the new leader even though you didn't get to pick the new leader.
And that wouldn't make sense.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,757
92
48
completely disagree there. Our teams TOTAL inability and ignorance on attacking a press is just one thing, off the top of my head. I could name at least 2-3 other, basic basketball fundamentals that we seems to miss.

For the first couple of years Butch Thompson couldn't teach pitching -- and last year Cohen couldn't teach hitting. Which isn't to say that all of our "bad coaching" is a talent problem -- but alot of it definitely can be. I'll reserve final assessment of our coaching for a later date.

I thought we did a good job attacking Arkansas' press. Most of our turnovers are always unforced brain farts, which makes it all the more infuriating. I do think we could stand to do alot better coaching on the offensive end -- but that's only 1/2 the game. Our defensive coaching has been excellent IMO. Either way -- you are going to look bad when shots don't fall. We look better when they do.
 
Last edited:

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,757
92
48
You can't fire him with the clear improvement on the court being seen so far -- and denying that it exists is ridiculous.
Please tell me what "clear improvement" you are talking about because it is not in any of the things I cited in my previous response to you?
BTW, when the same so called improvement (not sure what that is since you have not cited anything) happens next year and the record is analogous to what has been over the last three years and another year passes without postseason play, how are you going to justify firing Rick Ray when "Clear Improvement" is still being made (your words and assessment, not mine)?
You are seriously saying that you don't see improvement in this team across the board? To what extent have you been paying attention to the last 2 years? Convenient to count "wins" and "conference wins" as improvement markers at this point in time -- when we've got a couple expected wins left on the schedule.

Margins: Years 3, 2, 1
Vs best team in the SEC: NA, +11, +35&+25
2nd best: +20&+4, +22&+10, +30 ----- woulda, coulda, shoulda beat Arky at home this year...
3rd best: +4, +20&+21, +32&+8 ----- woulda, coulda, shoulda beat aTm on the road this year...
4th best: +6&+6, +7, +17&-6 ----- woulda, coulda, shoulda beat Ole Miss both home and away this year...
5th best: -6, +4, +42 ----- got over the hump against LSU....
6th best: +6, +19, +25&+16 ----- woulda, coulda, shoulda beat Georgia this year...

Average margins against the top half of a league that bottomed out in 2012 and is rebounding in a big way right now:
current - +5.71PPG
2014 - +14.25PPG
2013 - +22.2PPG

So -- we've been in every game against the top half of the league and led in the second half of every one of these games sans @ Bud Walton. We've got to learn to finish games -- no doubt. But to deny improvement even exists?

On the money -- you did exactly what I expected you to do. Must be cooked books!!1!1
I don't recall saying anyone "cooked books". Again, you seem to have a bad habit of making assumptions. I said the way those numbers are calculated did not factor in the three specific things I cited to you (right or wrong)!
Are you going to tell me that over the last three years we have not experienced a significant drop in season ticket sales, Bulldog Club contributions to Basketball and have been giving away free beverage and food at games! YES OR NO?
You know damn well all are true, therefore it is revenue LOST!
You implied that it is a lie with the "attendance" inference, calling it creative accounting -- which = cooked books.
You spouted off a bunch of stuff in ignorance of reality after being called on it(just like everyone does when hit with the actual numbers) that is INCLUDED in those numbers... while falsely attributing basketball revenue/lost revenue to faux sources in the methodology used in our accounting. If you would have made yourself useful and gone and read the full reports available at the site I linked, which is our official AD tax documents -- you would already know that.

The fact remains -- you alleged that "Rick Ray is costing our basketball program a million dollars a year...it's not profitable anymore" -- which was all total lies. I proved that by showing you that we are still making just as much money as we were before. Had you said "the program is suffering in relation to it's potential earnings ceiling in today's climate", I would have not only agreed with you, but gone into detail about how and why I agree with you and what we can do to try to fix that both in the short and longterm.
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
36
It doesn't

take John Stockton to improved on the areas I'm speaking to, on beating the press. Further, in relation to the defense, I believe we do well there mainly bc of the athletes we have on the roster. Sometimes, a good deal of the time, our spacing in the zone-D is ridiculous.
 

Salty Sands Dawg

Redshirt
Aug 25, 2012
291
0
0
You are seriously saying that you don't see improvement in this team across the board?
NO!

To what extent have you been paying attention to the last 2 years? Convenient to count "wins" and "conference wins" as improvement markers at this point in time -- when we've got a couple expected wins left on the schedule.
We are a charter member of and compete in the SEC! That is not "convenient", it is a FACT! Therefore, I cited both records and yes that is the key improvement marker that programs are judged on! By the way, we have lost two more games since I last replied to you.

Margins: Years 3, 2, 1
Vs best team in the SEC: NA, +11, +35&+25
2nd best: +20&+4, +22&+10, +30 ----- woulda, coulda, shoulda beat Arky at home this year...
3rd best: +4, +20&+21, +32&+8 ----- woulda, coulda, shoulda beat aTm on the road this year...
4th best: +6&+6, +7, +17&-6 ----- woulda, coulda, shoulda beat Ole Miss both home and away this year...
5th best: -6, +4, +42 ----- got over the hump against LSU....
6th best: +6, +19, +25&+16 ----- woulda, coulda, shoulda beat Georgia this year...

Average margins against the top half of a league that bottomed out in 2012 and is rebounding in a big way right now:
current - +5.71PPG
2014 - +14.25PPG
2013 - +22.2PPG

So -- we've been in every game against the top half of the league and led in the second half of every one of these games sans @ Bud Walton. We've got to learn to finish games -- no doubt. But to deny improvement even exists?
You continue to rationalize losing but thanks for showing something to justify your statement about"improvement in this team across the board".
You implied that it is a lie with the "attendance" inference, calling it creative accounting -- which = cooked books.
That's your perception, not my words. So you don't disagree about how attendance is recorded?

You spouted off a bunch of stuff in ignorance of reality after being called on it(just like everyone does when hit with the actual numbers) that is INCLUDED in those numbers... while falsely attributing basketball revenue/lost revenue to faux sources in the methodology used in our accounting. If you would have made yourself useful and gone and read the full reports available at the site I linked, which is our official AD tax documents -- you would already know that.
Thanks for the clarification on my mistake in my initial post (in this thread), my apologies. Now can you answer the question I asked you in my previous post regarding the same:
Are you going to tell me that over the last three years we have not experienced a significant drop in season ticket sales, Bulldog Club contributions to Basketball and have been giving away free beverage and food at games! YES OR NO?

The fact remains -- you alleged that "Rick Ray is costing our basketball program a million dollars a year...it's not profitable anymore" -- which was all total lies. I proved that by showing you that we are still making just as much money as we were before. Had you said "the program is suffering in relation to it's potential earnings ceiling in today's climate", I would have not only agreed with you, but gone into detail about how and why I agree with you and what we can do to try to fix that both in the short and longterm.
Thanks again for your clarification. You have already stated that you want to keep this regime in place and I (amongst many others) are opposed to it.
The only way to fix the problem is to start WINNING, which is clearly something that has not been in the cards (for a variety of reasons) to date under this leadership and by my evaluation (and many others) does not appear likely in the future.
 

tcdog70

Junior
Sep 24, 2012
1,376
250
83
Yeah, but Simmons won't be here for almost 20 months, and Weatherspoon is a nice player, but there is a big difference in a top 20 type recruit and a top 100 recruit that is a solid contributor.

I don't care what y'all do, my preference is for y'all to keep him, because if he gets next year, I could see him getting a 5th year.

This Reb sees it for what it is. He is correct on all points. Why is some Bulldogs like ole 7 are blind to the truth. Ray needs to go, should have never been hired. Chicken is a very good player and the rest are roll players or should be at Delta State. After three years we have subpar point guards. Every player that Ready guards lights our *** up. You can't bet the farm on players that are a year or two down the road. If you can't draw up an in bound play then you can't coach .
 

tcdog70

Junior
Sep 24, 2012
1,376
250
83
If Ray doesn't get to postseason play next season, I don't wanna wait on them. I'm not sold on Ray in the least, but I try to keep an open mind on him since he WILL be back next season. We're still recruiting players to come here and the constant ripping of our coach helps us in no way

So sunshine pumping helps? If you can't tell that Ray needs to after 3 years then you need to start posting on volley ball.
 

msstate7

Redshirt
Nov 27, 2008
10,388
10
38
So sunshine pumping helps? If you can't tell that Ray needs to after 3 years then you need to start posting on volley ball.

You must think I have major pull. You guys act like if you convince me ray needs to go that he'll be fired. I can assure you that whether I support Ray or bash him every post I make, it makes no difference in regards to ray's future. He's gonna be back so I don't see what the constant ripping does for us. If you want ray gone this year, convince SS, not me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.