If LSU had about 5-6M in 2024 pre-revenue sharing how much do you think most average everyday schools had before revenue sharing?
Here are some more quotes from assistants at LSU from an article in the Athletic in November 2024. Now who would have assumed comments like these coming out of LSU. I bet no one, myself included.
Like I've said, revenue sharing was the big deal, 3rd party NIL not so much in most places. That's why I've seen quite a few comments from coaches looking forward to revenue sharing because it was much bigger difference maker than 3rd party NIL in most places. I've posted quotes about that here too.
From the article:
There are also questions about how well LSU is keeping up with the competition when it comes to name, image and likeness compensation for players.
“Some of it has been the misperception that this place is rolling in dough, when the reality of it is they are losing recruits because they’re simply being outbid,” one of the former assistants said.
Back in May, Kelly lamented LSU coming up short when portal shopping: “We were in the market, in the transfer portal, looking for defensive linemen. It hasn’t fared very well, quite frankly, because we are selling something a little bit differently. And that is, we want to recruit. We want to engage, build relationships. We want to develop, retain, and have success. We’re not in the market of buying players. … And unfortunately, right now, that’s what some guys are looking for. They want to be bought. … We’re not going to go out and buy players.”
With revenue-sharing with players on the horizon, and possibly less emphasis on booster-funded NIL deals, the system might be moving in Kelly’s favor.