Well if it was happening on such a level it would be out there. It's just these minor deals here and there, not these gigantic deals everyone seems to think are happening all over the place at the mid tier level.Just because you don't see it doesn't mean it isn't happening. Is there a database of NIL deals? All we see are the outrageous deals. I tend to focus on RU and right now our NIL collective only focuses on current RU athletes. They do not offer deals to recruits or potential transfers which puts us at a disadvantage. I don't know the specific impact of NIL on transfers but there is impact and it's only negative for RU.
NILs are everywhere but really how substantial are most of them and how much money is flowing to get all these top players from one mid tier to another.
I said this above, schools are what they were by and large. The ones who had the resources before have them now and the ones who don't still don't. I don't think there was this wave of booster money in the mid tier or lower schools that was dammed up all this time and was just waiting to be unleashed by NIL. If it was there all along it would have shown up in other ways before NIL.
It would matter more if there was a bunch of mid tier schools throwing around money like a drunken sailor. But you don't hear those outrageous numbers like you say so without those outrageous numbers how can you expect outrageous movement for the top players.
IMO NIL is just more of the same of what's always existed. The only times I hear about mass exodus from a team might be off coaching controversy and/or firing and looking at it, even that didn't make a huge dent in performance for teams like Tenn and Kansas. They've actually improved from where they were because they found the right guy.
Last edited: