Harsh reality about NIL

Dec 17, 2008
45,214
16,774
0
You know I love college football as a regular in the weekly game threads. But there's only one team I truly devote most of my time to, Rutgers. Until something changes with the free for all unregulated pay for play NIL, it will be the death kneel that keeps Rutgers down for the foreseeable future. I really don't give two sh*ts about other schools or their players. This Pay for play move directly impacts Rutgers and will continue to make us a laughingstock.
Hire the right people whether that be GS or someone else if he doesn’t work and RU can compete too. Easier said than done but that’s what it is. Cincy has done it through multiple coaches and ADs, WF is doing a good job with one coach. Whatever the path, imo it’s possible. Heck IU would’ve made a 12 team playoff in the pandemic year.
 

JayDogSmooth

All-Conference
Aug 18, 2006
8,096
3,789
0
NIL was happening before and NIL, now it stands for now it’s legal.

We were not competing with any of the elites prior to NIL

I love the idea and I’ve donated to KTR and Geos foundation as well, and can’t wait to see what the future holds

I might be in the minority, but I am very excited and think this is long overdue
 

ScarletKid2008

Heisman
Sep 8, 2006
8,040
10,545
113
By the way @Geo_Baker_1

I think more people need to read your Twitter thread that you referenced and linked earlier about Rutgers and Knight Society approach to NIL.

I LOVE the approach and view being taken. Essentially saying we’re not trying to be the school or collective that pays the most but instead to create a closer and stronger bond between the fans Alumni and student athletes to make the RU NIL proposition more about a super strong network and more of a family feel. I think that’s very achievable and a competitive advantage that we should aspire for vs being the highest bidder.

love it. Keep up the good work . Respect.
 

AZBlues

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2013
1,185
1,389
0
You should visit other team’s sites to understand how unpopular your opinion is
Most other teams aren't in the Northeast, where due to population density, we have more other local teams, pro, college, etc, that we also root for... All of our athletic fan vicarious self-esteem eggs aren't in one basket, like in many more rural areas... When the day comes that New Jersey voters feel that Rutgers athletic superiority is the most important thing for their happiness and quality of life, and they routinely choose former RU players and coaches as their best qualified US Senate candidates, then I'll believe things are becoming more equal... (smile).
 

RULoyal

Heisman
Jul 28, 2001
15,505
18,751
113
NIL was happening before and NIL, now it stands for now it’s legal.

We were not competing with any of the elites prior to NIL

I love the idea and I’ve donated to KTR and Geos foundation as well, and can’t wait to see what the future holds

I might be in the minority, but I am very excited and think this is long overdue
The only problem is that previously the elites were primarily elite based on success. Now we must compete against teams who are elite based on the financial support from their fan base and if you have been an RU fan for any length of time you know where we fall on that list. The gap has only become wider.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-AGK

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,095
12,887
113
The only problem is that previously the elites were primarily elite based on success. Now we must compete against teams who are elite based on the financial support from their fan base and if you have been an RU fan for any length of time you know where we fall on that list. The gap has only become wider.

Didn't those teams become elite because of massive donations from their fans directly to the AD?

OSU and UM have been receiving the same conference payouts as Purdue and Northwestern, haven't they?

The "problem" (if you consider it one) isn't NIL.
It's direct institutional support of the broader athletic program.

As I've said - ban NIL. We are still tens of millions behind OSU/UM/PSU in annual revenue - are we not?

i.e. you really want to ban donations to the AD altogether.
Someone float that past AD Hobbs and get his response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geo_Baker_1

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,736
86,734
113
As someone who falls more on your side than the other, this is a really simplistic view. You have to acknowledge that student athletes at P5 universities are being paid through scholarships, meals, gear, and a million other perks. It's not as black and white as you make it out to be.
Agree. Happy Geo is here and answering candidly. But he made it seem like some sort of sweatshop and forced labor with no pay or benefits. I had nno scholarships or financial support from my family. I worked 30 plus hours per week during the semesters and 50 plus on breaks. I would have gladly traded to get free tuition room and board to stay on campus and play games that I love.
 
Last edited:

gman500

Senior
Feb 2, 2004
458
496
0
Without alumni fan bases… there is is no billion dollar industry to begin with. When players start transferring for more money and concentrating talent onto fewer teams, fanbases will lose interest and losing will continue for have nots. There will be no way for most college players to get the opportunity to go to school for free or to showcase themselves to people that give a damn. Ultimately this will hurt most collegiate athletes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-AGK

RULoyal

Heisman
Jul 28, 2001
15,505
18,751
113
Didn't those teams become elite because of massive donations from their fans directly to the AD?

OSU and UM have been receiving the same conference payouts as Purdue and Northwestern, haven't they?

The "problem" (if you consider it one) isn't NIL.
It's direct institutional support of the broader athletic program.

As I've said - ban NIL. We are still tens of millions behind OSU/UM/PSU in annual revenue - are we not?

i.e. you really want to ban donations to the AD altogether.
Someone float that past AD Hobbs and get his response.
You are correct but those massive donations could not (legally) be used to buy players. Now, even if those programs with massive donations were not elite performers, the fans can now funnel some of their massive donations to NIL. We are bringing a pea shooter to a gun fight.

Okay don’t know where you came up with the idea I want to ban donations to the AD.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,700
18,991
113
In the future, NIL could cause college football to look more like college hockey. The number of D1 schools will eventually decrease once they realize they are irrelevant and decide funding football programs is pointless. High school kids will bail on high school to play for junior or semi-pro football teams before either going to the NFL or jumping to a power conference team. I just don’t see how or why colleges would continue to fund D1 football programs if they are shut out of playoffs and aren’t receiving any meaningful payouts.

Actually college hockey has been relatively stable after growing from the 70s through the 90s.
 

LETSGORU91_

All-American
Jan 29, 2017
6,500
7,245
0
the answer is no because rutgers wants that kid on scholarship to represent the school. Rutgers is paying in hopes the kid will give back to the school one day
Rutgers doles out scholarships in hopes that all athletes will one day give money back to the school??? That sounds like a losing proposition if Rutgers thinks along those lines.
if college athletes become employees p5 will probably break off from everyone else and could see scholarships going away for sure if that’s what you’re saying.
If that's the case, in essence, NIL will giveth opportunities for the upper echelon but taketh away (scholarship money) for a very large portion who are not good enough to garner NIL deals. This could lead to a net loss in the number of athletes who do not receive anything (NIL or scholarship). That would be a big back fire by NIL proponents who wanted to open the doors so that all athletes can prosper.
 

Geo_Baker_1

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2022
331
3,231
71
Agree. Happy Geo is here and answering candidly. But he made it seem like some sort of sweatshop and forced labor with no pay or benefits. I hadnno scholarships or fimancial support from my family. I worked 30 plus hours per week during the semesters and 50 plus on breaks. I would have gladly traded to get free tuition room.and board tonstay on campus and play games that I love.
If explaining why athletes are worth more than a scholarship in a billion dollar business is describing a sweat shop then sure. I’ve said every time how grateful i am for a scholarship and my time at rutgers. It’s okay to be grateful while understanding there is room for improvement
 

Geo_Baker_1

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2022
331
3,231
71
By the way @Geo_Baker_1

I think more people need to read your Twitter thread that you referenced and linked earlier about Rutgers and Knight Society approach to NIL.

I LOVE the approach and view being taken. Essentially saying we’re not trying to be the school or collective that pays the most but instead to create a closer and stronger bond between the fans Alumni and student athletes to make the RU NIL proposition more about a super strong network and more of a family feel. I think that’s very achievable and a competitive advantage that we should aspire for vs being the highest bidder.

love it. Keep up the good work . Respect.
I appreciate this! I feel like a lot of the people who came in bashing didn’t even read the thread 🤣🤣

I think it’s very achievable and a great way to combat the big time donors at other schools
 

Geo_Baker_1

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2022
331
3,231
71
Rutgers doles out scholarships in hopes that all athletes will one day give money back to the school??? That sounds like a losing proposition if Rutgers thinks along those lines.

If that's the case, in essence, NIL will giveth opportunities for the upper echelon but taketh away (scholarship money) for a very large portion who are not good enough to garner NIL deals. This could lead to a net loss in the number of athletes who do not receive anything (NIL or scholarship). That would be a big back fire by NIL proponents who wanted to open the doors so that all athletes can prosper.
I think scholarships would go away for p5 only. Or maybe like an option to become an employee for the school and don’t attend school just represent the university or take a scholarship. Totally spit balling.

and i worded it wrong but schools offer scholarships to help provide to high achieving students but also because they want those students representing their brand. That’s why not everyone gets a scholarship. Rutgers being a good academic school and athletic school leads to more people wanting to attend. It’s a good investment.
 

mikebal9

All-Conference
Oct 15, 2005
5,737
4,974
113
Its definitely acknowledged. Forever grateful for rutgers. I’ll be a fan for life. Will try to help anyone who is an alumni with whatever connections I’ve made for life.

but if you’re on the inside of p5 football/basketball you’d understand better. It’s a literal job. There’s no other way to describe it. The automatic reaction is always yeah well free school. These coaches aren’t getting paid millions for no reason. They are going to get you in the easiest classes and easiest majors to make sure you are successful on the field/court. Everybody’s doing communications, labor studies, and Africana studies. It’s not by accident 😂

Yes they chose the lifestyle and the sacrifice but they should be making some money along the way due to that. Big ten is adding schools from California soon. Let’s call it what it is: a professional sports business. You can’t keep calling kids student athletes and refuse to acknowledge the student side

Agree. Happy Geo is here and answering candidly. But he made it seem like some sort of sweatshop and forced labor with no pay or benefits. I hadnno scholarships or fimancial support from my family. I worked 30 plus hours per week during the semesters and 50 plus on breaks. I would have gladly traded to get free tuition room.and board tonstay on campus and play games that I love.
Me too. I worked full time all 6 years I was at RU. Paid my own way because I had no help from my parents. Paid for my own housing and meals. I think these kids should be allowed to earn money outside of playing sports. Like camps, their own apparel, endorsements, etc. Just like I was paid for working at Bridgewater Commons. I understand that they bring value to the university. In that case, it's the university's job to pay them, not mine.
 

Geo_Baker_1

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2022
331
3,231
71
Me too. I worked full time all 6 years I was at RU. Paid my own way because I had no help from my parents. Paid for my own housing and meals. I think these kids should be allowed to earn money outside of playing sports. Like camps, their own apparel, endorsements, etc. Just like I was paid for working at Bridgewater Commons. I understand that they bring value to the university. In that case, it's the university's job to pay them, not mine.
I feel like we are on the same page. It’s 100 percent not a fans “job” to pay student athletes. If you read through my Twitter post, the whole of idea of knight society is to create something so cool for rutgers fans that you’ll WANT to pay for the experience.

we are trying to create something valuable for everyone
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,736
86,734
113
I feel like we are on the same page. It’s 100 percent not a fans “job” to pay student athletes. If you read through my Twitter post, the whole of idea of knight society is to create something so cool for rutgers fans that you’ll WANT to pay for the experience.

we are trying to create something valuable for everyone
I'm probably coming off as a get off my lawn type, but for me, I have zero interest in meeting/interacting with players, having them make an appearance or support my business. None. That does not mean I admire the talents of student athletes for their contributions at their respective sports, and I particularly like the athletes who do a lot for charity or otherwise are great ambassadors for Rutgers.

My position here is the same way I feel about actors and musicians in my favorite bands. I have little to no interest meeting them. I am happy enjoying their work. I don't want or need an autograph, a poster or a photo op.

A question is for guys like me, why do I give? Solely so Rutgers can stay competitive?
 

AdventureHasAName

All-Conference
Mar 1, 2022
1,761
1,920
113
just feels like too many people are thinking too much about how this hurts rutgers and not enough about how it helps humans. My goal is to help both.
As schools refuse to play the NIL game and drop athletic programs and athletic scholarships, you will have helped remove the opportunity to get a free college education from thousands of poor kids who would have received scholarships absent NIL. You're not helping anyone but yourself.
 

Randal7

All-American
Jul 22, 2009
6,710
6,120
77
I'm probably coming off as a get off my lawn type, but for me, I have zero interest in meeting/interacting with players, having them make an appearance or support my business. None. That does not mean I admire the talents of student athletes for their contributions at their respective sports, and I particularly like the athletes who do a lot for charity or otherwise are great ambassadors for Rutgers.

My position here is the same way I feel about actors and musicians in my favorite bands. I have little to no interest meeting them. I am happy enjoying their work. I don't want or need an autograph, a poster or a photo op.

A question is for guys like me, why do I give? Solely so Rutgers can stay competitive?
There is no “extra”‘ experience that would make the athletic product more interesting or engaging for you? You wouldn’t want, for example, a Geo Baker to call your kid and wish them a happy birthday?
 

Letitrip

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2007
2,386
4,225
66
I'm probably coming off as a get off my lawn type, but for me, I have zero interest in meeting/interacting with players, having them make an appearance or support my business. None. That does not mean I admire the talents of student athletes for their contributions at their respective sports, and I particularly like the athletes who do a lot for charity or otherwise are great ambassadors for Rutgers.

My position here is the same way I feel about actors and musicians in my favorite bands. I have little to no interest meeting them. I am happy enjoying their work. I don't want or need an autograph, a poster or a photo op.

A question is for guys like me, why do I give? Solely so Rutgers can stay competitive?
Wow - you just wrote my exact feelings. I go to games to watch football and tailgate - not to meet "stars".
 

Letitrip

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2007
2,386
4,225
66
The NIL insecurity of the fans on this board is just silly. We had better players in every game we played this year except OSU. Relax.
 

RUAldo

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2008
5,009
3,575
113
I appreciate this! I feel like a lot of the people who came in bashing didn’t even read the thread 🤣🤣

I think it’s very achievable and a great way to combat the big time donors at other schools
Admittedly, the NCAA seems useless in many respects, but if you take away the NCAA and the schools that fund football programs, what do the players have left? I doubt many high schoolers would be drafted in the NFL given the gap in physical development and skills. My main point is players seem to forget that the only reason they have a platform to showcase their talent (and earn NIL) is because of the NCAA/colleges. But that seems to get completely lost in the debate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-AGK

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,736
86,734
113
There is no “extra”‘ experience that would make the athletic product more interesting or engaging for you? You wouldn’t want, for example, a Geo Baker to call your kid and wish them a happy birthday?
My kids are adults. They never had an interest in sports or athletes. My oldest is a senior-went to the first game first year and not one after that. A lot of younger people are not into sports.
Wow - you just wrote my exact feelings. I go to games to watch football and tailgate - not to meet "stars".
Exactly. For me and my wife, it's 6 dates in the fall with food, friends and frustration (when in the stadium). We enjoy spending time together going to the games.
 

JayDogSmooth

All-Conference
Aug 18, 2006
8,096
3,789
0
The only problem is that previously the elites were primarily elite based on success. Now we must compete against teams who are elite based on the financial support from their fan base and if you have been an RU fan for any length of time you know where we fall on that list. The gap has only become wider.
I never felt we could compete long term with the elites under the old rules

Under the new rules, this at least gives me hope
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rurichdog

RULoyal

Heisman
Jul 28, 2001
15,505
18,751
113
Wow - you just wrote my exact feelings. I go to games to watch football and tailgate - not to meet "stars".
My feelings also. I have no desire to meet or talk to any player, college or pro. Just don’t see the attraction. Same with movie stars, musicians, etc. I enjoy what they do but they’re just people.
 

Randal7

All-American
Jul 22, 2009
6,710
6,120
77
My kids are adults. They never had an interest in sports or athletes. My oldest is a senior-went to the first game first year and not one after that. A lot of younger people are not into sports.

Exactly. For me and my wife, it's 6 dates in the fall with food, friends and frustration (when in the stadium). We enjoy spending time together going to the games.
I respect that. Im just wondering if there’s anything else that would “round out” the experience. There’s no exclusive thing you could have that would mean something to you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

Geo_Baker_1

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2022
331
3,231
71
As schools refuse to play the NIL game and drop athletic programs and athletic scholarships, you will have helped remove the opportunity to get a free college education from thousands of poor kids who would have received scholarships absent NIL. You're not helping anyone but yourself.
The more times you come on here to say this isn’t going to make it any more true lol.

And I’m only helping myself? I started an entire company solely focused on helping others lol. I personally have not made a single cent from it.
 

Randal7

All-American
Jul 22, 2009
6,710
6,120
77
My feelings also. I have no desire to meet or talk to any player, college or pro. Just don’t see the attraction. Same with movie stars, musicians, etc. I enjoy what they do but they’re just people.
For me, the fact that they are “just people” makes it very interesting. While some are just naturally endowed with great athleticism (they won the genetic lottery and don’t need to work super hard), I think the majority worked their asses off and sacrificed to get to where they are. And to understand that strife and that sacrifice is, to me, both inspiring and uplifting
 
  • Like
Reactions: newell138

RU_87

Junior
Aug 19, 2001
279
264
43
I’d take that bet with you. The next step that’s going to happen from this is student athletes will become employees. If that step doesn’t happen and it’s only NIL, their scholarships are not going to change.

You’re better than most with the scholarship situation. Easier to say hypothetically though lol.

you can’t penalize a kid if someone thinks they’re worth a million dollars by turning around and saying well now you’re school isn’t paid for. It’s getting paid for based off a skill that a very small percentage of the world have.
Just a thought…To continue down the NIL path, maybe by becoming professional employees it could become a step in the right direction. In just about every employment agreement, other than being your own independent entrepreneur, are agreements signed by the employee. These include Non-Compete agreements, non-disclosure agreements, signing over the rights of anything the employee designs, develops, thinks about as an employee of the business, that the business has the rights to such intellectual properties. It may be an evolution to get there when treated like employees.

Here’s my separate thought on corralling businesses, etc. NYC is the mecca of the advertising world, Rutgers has a Communications College, wouldn’t professors in the college have colleagues in the industry, students graduating over many years that work in the industry … whether on the account management side or the creative side of advertising. I would think these connections would be ripe for getting dialogue within the industry to consider using / employing RU student athletes in place of other no name talent to be used in print, digital media, TV ads, etc. It might be difficult at first but it takes just placing one student athlete on say a Jersey Mike’s commercial to show it can be done. If it works for Jersey Mike’s then that recognition is seen by more potential players to commit… as well as representative back to other businesses that they can do the same thing with RU student athletes. We need our athletics and academics departments to collaborate with business connections. … or we need more Mr & Mrs Brown’s / business leaders that have the means to donate like they already do. We don’t have oil money donators here in NJ, we don’t have sneaker money here in NJ, manufacturing is not what it used to be. Pharma is big in NJ but we know that their ability to advertise is regulated. They can’t even put their company name on TV advertisements when airing an advertisement for a specific medicine. So they’re probably not going to get heavily involved … although I’d hope they could. Financial Industry is big w Wall St right here in NYC. Need to start breaking down the walls on those connections. How about getting the state involved, NJ Transit, NJ MVC, etc. They all do some level of advertising. Need to convince some of these agencies to use a likeness of an RU student athlete in print, etc vs a random person from some other talent agency
 

Geo_Baker_1

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2022
331
3,231
71
My kids are adults. They never had an interest in sports or athletes. My oldest is a senior-went to the first game first year and not one after that. A lot of younger people are not into sports.

Exactly. For me and my wife, it's 6 dates in the fall with food, friends and frustration (when in the stadium). We enjoy spending time together going to the games.
I think if there’s nothing extra of value to you then don’t spend money lol. I’m not spending money on something that i dont find valuable 😂 knight society will be deeper than just NIL though. One day it’ll be engrained in the community where it just makes sense to be a member instead of the alternative. Long road ahead though
 

AdventureHasAName

All-Conference
Mar 1, 2022
1,761
1,920
113
The more times you come on here to say this isn’t going to make it any more true lol.

And I’m only helping myself? I started an entire company solely focused on helping others lol. I personally have not made a single cent from it.
If the amount of NIL money you've made is > $0.00, you're helping yourself to the detriment of others.
 

knightfan2000

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2005
1,598
1,272
113
I am absolutely in awe of what Geo has done in the NIL realm. My daughter was an NCAA athlete and looking back the private clinics she hosted in the summers were probably an NCAA violation, which is ridiculous. I am happy to support athletes knowing how much they sacrifice to represent their schools, beyond any other students. On the other hand, I think college football is the problem child and I truly believe that in 20 or 30 years, it will be a thing of the past. Between parents not allowing their kids to play, high schools disbanding teams due to lack of interest, serious injuries like the spinal cord injury to Eric LeGrand, and now NIL out of control, days are numbered. Then we can focus on true collegiate athletics like women's soccer (which I now support even more than football), lacrosse, softball, basketball and baseball. I have no problem supporting NIL for those sports. Football is a whole different story.
 

mikebal9

All-Conference
Oct 15, 2005
5,737
4,974
113
I feel like we are on the same page. It’s 100 percent not a fans “job” to pay student athletes. If you read through my Twitter post, the whole of idea of knight society is to create something so cool for rutgers fans that you’ll WANT to pay for the experience.

we are trying to create something valuable for everyone
I have read, and as I said in a previous post, I think I'm way more with you than against you. I think your goal is admirable. I just, unfortunately, think it's naive to believe it can happen in a way that makes college Athletics fair for all schools competing at the same level. It just won't ever be what you and I want it to be because the haves will never allow it to be. I commend your efforts and share your goal. I just don't think it's attainable.
 

RUAldo

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2008
5,009
3,575
113
On the other hand, I think college football is the problem child and I truly believe that in 20 or 30 years, it will be a thing of the past. Between parents not allowing their kids to play, high schools disbanding teams due to lack of interest, serious injuries like the spinal cord injury to Eric LeGrand, and now NIL out of control, days are numbered. Then we can focus on true collegiate athletics like women's soccer (which I now support even more than football), lacrosse, softball, basketball and baseball. I have no problem supporting NIL for those sports. Football is a whole different story.
I tend to agree that football could look very different in 20-30 years. It’s a sport entirely based around body collisions. At the youth level, the players are bigger, faster, stronger and injuries start piling up fast. Went to 8th grade football team last week and one of the players got rocked and had a nasty concussion. I later learned it was his fourth one and was in the hospital next day. As a guy that played football growing up including high school I never thought I would keep my son from playing and push him to other sports.
 

RULoyal

Heisman
Jul 28, 2001
15,505
18,751
113
For me, the fact that they are “just people” makes it very interesting. While some are just naturally endowed with great athleticism (they won the genetic lottery and don’t need to work super hard), I think the majority worked their asses off and sacrificed to get to where they are. And to understand that strife and that sacrifice is, to me, both inspiring and uplifting
While that maybe be true it’s not worth paying for - at least not for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Randal7

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,095
12,887
113
It actually makes it worse. Before we couldn’t compete on the field. Now we also can’t compete at the cashier’s window.

Why couldn't we compete on the field?
Because other schools received tens of millions from donors to spend that we didn't have.
Literally nothing has changed.

Having to keep HC Ash because we didn't have the funds to fire him early is a lot more costly than any potential loss due to "NIL".