The mom & pop landlords should’ve sold their extra houses that they could barely afford, instead of getting greedy and riding a gravy train of rent that they can’t float for two months.Any health care worker that relies on some/most/all non emergent procedures, which is like 90% of healthcare, is completely screwed.
My brother was informed last week that his physicians group will be the only people seeing and treating COVID 19 patients. So he won’t have a pay cut, that lucky rascal.
Im not entirely sure what Joey is arguing. I think he’s under the impression that because a landlord is bitching that he’s not getting any rent that means he’ll go homeless without it? That’s he’s fiscally irresponsible? Responsible for the downfall of society? Not sure but I’m on board 100%
You should read more articles, Clark. 400 credit scores got houses to live in as their primary residence. Medium and higher credit scores gobbled up extra houses as investments, raised housing prices, ruined housing stock, realized they couldn’t afford them and were the first to foreclose and ruin local markets. It wasn’t the subprime loans, it was more of the normal loans who were trying to make a buck and took too much risk.We could trade articles back and forth on subprime mortgages, hedge fund accountability, etc or watch The Big Short- but obviously there is a big difference with banks giving people with 400 credit scores a credit line to buy a flip house and them getting stuck with them... I'm not sure i'd lump that group in with people that are renting out the old house they used to live in.
The same deal applies for keeping a house you used to live in: hoarding housing stock to make a buck instead of letting someone else own a home, and then crying foul when you can’t pay for two extra months of mortgage. Because you don’t own the house, you were just acting as a middleman to the real owner, the bank (while increasing house costs for everyone else so you could take a cut).