Good Lord, you are dumbIt's rigged.
Good Lord, you are dumbIt's rigged.
I tend to avoid labeling someone unless someone absolutely has earned it.Read better.
And don't call me a liar, you idiot
And yours would that be you can't read worth a ****.I tend to avoid labeling someone unless someone absolutely has earned.
You typed things then typed that you didn’t type those things. Then said you had a reason.
Unfortunately that makes you a liar. It’s a character flaw you have.
Actually my enhanced reading skills is what allowed me to see that you both typed things, then denied typing things and then said 'well I typed them for a reason'And yours would that be you can't read worth a ****
Really starting to feel sorry for you bro.Actually my enhanced reading skills is what allowed me to see that you both typed things, then denied typing things and then said 'well I typed them for a reason'
Should I start a poll
"which character flaw would you rather have
A. Be considered a poor reader by one of the worst posters on this, or any board
or
B. Be a documented liar
Heck i could even enhance it by just leaving A as 'be considered a bad reader'
That is a skill that can be worked on. Lying is a character flaw that stays with you for life. Enjoy that burden.
You guys are just killing this thread engaging with him. Ignore him please.Actually my enhanced reading skills is what allowed me to see that you both typed things, then denied typing things and then said 'well I typed them for a reason'
Should I start a poll
"which character flaw would you rather have
A. Be considered a poor reader by one of the worst posters on this, or any board
or
B. Be a documented liar
Heck i could even enhance it by just leaving A as 'be considered a bad reader'
That is a skill that can be worked on. Lying is a character flaw that stays with you for life. Enjoy that burden.
Thank youYou guys are just killing this thread engaging with him. Ignore him please.
Nah, no need to. Also, if you're gonna go that way........Read better, pedophile
Hey, I'm not the one who thought that Paige Beuckers was always better than Caitlin Clark..............Good Lord, you are dumb
I agree. No need for us to be calling each other things that were notNah, no need to. Also, if you're gonna go that way........
![]()
Nor am IHey, I'm not the one who thought that Paige Beuckers was always better than Caitlin Clark..............![]()
True, BUT she had a lot of TO's at Iowa as well, but literally carried an overall average team to the very brink of back to back National championships, while leading the nation in scoring and assists. I'll deal with the "bad" for that level of great.....Why do stats not show the negative side of stats? Although CC is averaging 20.1 points, 9 assists and 5 rebounds per game in her WNBA career, she also has averaged 5.1 turnovers per game. Her fast pace plus players not familiar with her passing surely contributes. I did see she has improved from 5.6 her rookie year to averaging 4.6 this year.
Assist to turnovers is a true measurable, just saying.
Be gone Nebraska troll. It's time for your sponge bath at the nursing home.
How many to's a game are because her team mates suck at handling her passesTrue, BUT she had a lot of TO's at Iowa as well, but literally carried an overall average team to the very brink of back to back National championships, while leading the nation in scoring and assists. I'll deal with the "bad" for that level of great.....
Angel showing the world that she dominates women's basketball and can't be stopped by anyone.
Watch:
I agree, I shouldn't engage with people that lie as part of who they are. I will work at it but I suffer fools poorly especially when they are being dishonest and factually inaccurate.You guys are just killing this thread engaging with him. Ignore him please.
So you typed 'Paige was always better' and 'if I was forced to pick'And yours would that be you can't read worth a ****.
Perfectly legitimate explanations, clarifications, and admissions.
Get over yourself.
I have no problem saying if I was forced to pick, I'd take PB. That just wasn't what I was communicating when I said, "Paige WAS always better". As AGAIN, the context of the paragraph clearly shows
I didn't say either player was better.
Pesky detailsNor am I
No doubt, both college and in the W. Really thought that would change when she went pro, but it sure hasn't. Well, they often catch the ball, they just cant finish at the rim much of the timeHow many to's a game are because her team mates suck at handling her passes
The league was a lot worse last year especially later in the year.5 Fever players had season ending injuries last year - Clark, Cunningham, Sydney Colson, Aari McDonald, and Chloe Bibby.
White got the team within one game of the WNBA finals with a depleted regular roster and a number of emergency replacement players They will be fine if they can stay relatively healthy.
Wish they would have re-signed Natasha Howard.
She’s also a very high usage guard, so her turnovers per attempts is probably one of the better ones in the league. If someone averages two turnovers per game, look at how many times they handle the ball then multiply that number plus the turnovers to equal how many times CC handles it.Why do stats not show the negative side of stats? Although CC is averaging 20.1 points, 9 assists and 5 rebounds per game in her WNBA career, she also has averaged 5.1 turnovers per game. Her fast pace plus players not familiar with her passing surely contributes. I did see she has improved from 5.6 her rookie year to averaging 4.6 this year.
Assist to turnovers is a true measurable, just saying.
Angel showing the world that she dominates women's basketball and can't be stopped by anyone.
Watch:
That was a helluva clothes-line lol.Still double doubled and won. Griner also fined for an upgraded flagrant on Reese.
May I respectfully suggest you get a life? Please.No, you are mixing two different distinctions that have had to be made. All of this has already been broken down and this is the last time I will be doing it.
First, to get out of the way my thoughts on context, which you are trying to catch me on. I'm on record saying context does not matter when it comes to the record book, and especially 26 year books. For example, people's opinions about strength of schedule mean jack squat. But I'm sure you already knew all that. So, nice try.
The first distinction that had to be made was when someone thought they were clever and were going to catch me in having said, "I never said PB IS better", by quoting my having previously said, "Paige WAS always better."
I can see how someone might not initially realize the distinction. But I can also see how anyone that's actually a careful reader, and doesn't have their panties all up in bunch, trying to catch Ole Eyes in a contradiction, would easily enough pick up on the distinction, given the context of the rest of the 2nd quote's paragraph, that is clearly discussing the years prior Paige's injury.
The 2nd distinction that had to be made, was when some clever no-life tried to catch me in a contradiction, where I had used "was", instead of more appropriately having used "is".
To that, I have already admitted to sloppy wording. And have shown it to have been in response to you having posted "CC > Paige". The greater than symbol is representative only of the present. Therefore, with that context, it could have easily enough been implied that I also was speaking of the comparison between the two players, at present.
When people stop nitpicking semantics and trying to ambush contradictions, is when I might start to wonder if the thoughts in my posts might be somewhat off-base.
And I'm going to give you a pass on calling me a Nebraska fan, even though your previously having been warned, based on the context of that previous warning having been in this thread, and it being obvious that you are only doing it now to be a jackass. But please stop
THEY HAD TO UPGRADE THAT! JFC, it looked criminal.Still double doubled and won. Griner also fined for an upgraded flagrant on Reese.