Good Lord, you are dumbIt's rigged.
Good Lord, you are dumbIt's rigged.
I tend to avoid labeling someone unless someone absolutely has earned it.Read better.
And don't call me a liar, you idiot
And yours would that be you can't read worth a ****.I tend to avoid labeling someone unless someone absolutely has earned.
You typed things then typed that you didn’t type those things. Then said you had a reason.
Unfortunately that makes you a liar. It’s a character flaw you have.
Actually my enhanced reading skills is what allowed me to see that you both typed things, then denied typing things and then said 'well I typed them for a reason'And yours would that be you can't read worth a ****
Really starting to feel sorry for you bro.Actually my enhanced reading skills is what allowed me to see that you both typed things, then denied typing things and then said 'well I typed them for a reason'
Should I start a poll
"which character flaw would you rather have
A. Be considered a poor reader by one of the worst posters on this, or any board
or
B. Be a documented liar
Heck i could even enhance it by just leaving A as 'be considered a bad reader'
That is a skill that can be worked on. Lying is a character flaw that stays with you for life. Enjoy that burden.
You guys are just killing this thread engaging with him. Ignore him please.Actually my enhanced reading skills is what allowed me to see that you both typed things, then denied typing things and then said 'well I typed them for a reason'
Should I start a poll
"which character flaw would you rather have
A. Be considered a poor reader by one of the worst posters on this, or any board
or
B. Be a documented liar
Heck i could even enhance it by just leaving A as 'be considered a bad reader'
That is a skill that can be worked on. Lying is a character flaw that stays with you for life. Enjoy that burden.
Thank youYou guys are just killing this thread engaging with him. Ignore him please.
Nah, no need to. Also, if you're gonna go that way........Read better, pedophile
Hey, I'm not the one who thought that Paige Beuckers was always better than Caitlin Clark..............Good Lord, you are dumb
I agree. No need for us to be calling each other things that were notNah, no need to. Also, if you're gonna go that way........
![]()
Nor am IHey, I'm not the one who thought that Paige Beuckers was always better than Caitlin Clark..............![]()
True, BUT she had a lot of TO's at Iowa as well, but literally carried an overall average team to the very brink of back to back National championships, while leading the nation in scoring and assists. I'll deal with the "bad" for that level of great.....Why do stats not show the negative side of stats? Although CC is averaging 20.1 points, 9 assists and 5 rebounds per game in her WNBA career, she also has averaged 5.1 turnovers per game. Her fast pace plus players not familiar with her passing surely contributes. I did see she has improved from 5.6 her rookie year to averaging 4.6 this year.
Assist to turnovers is a true measurable, just saying.
Be gone Nebraska troll. It's time for your sponge bath at the nursing home.
How many to's a game are because her team mates suck at handling her passesTrue, BUT she had a lot of TO's at Iowa as well, but literally carried an overall average team to the very brink of back to back National championships, while leading the nation in scoring and assists. I'll deal with the "bad" for that level of great.....