So, player behavior isn't being enforced on an equitable level because of this?The point obviously. Thomas is a dangerous player. There have been numerous instances of her behavior before last Monday and Wednesday night. This needs to be addressed by the league, and it has nothing to do with Clark.
And still, the additional punishment wouldn't have a darn thing to do with CC.#1. 10 game suspension. 10K Fine.
#2. Refer to post #8351 #2.
Sorry you're not having fun.![]()
And still, the additional punishment wouldn't have a darn thing to do with CC.
Nor would it do a darn thing for CC
She tried to downplay what she did. She even said "I didn't know that it happened."Never understood the point of mischaracterizing something that can be revealed with the press of a "play" button.
SMH
@eyesofhawk:She tried to downplay what she did. She even said "I didn't know that it happened."
I'd tell you to read better, but like you said, seeing as there's video evidence, you cant unf*** your way out of this one. All that's left is for you to dig down.........![]()
At no point did she say what the tweeters claimed she said.She tried to downplay what she did. She even said "I didn't know that it happened."
I'd tell you to read better, but like you said, seeing as there's video evidence, you cant unf*** your way out of this one. All that's left is for you to dig down.........![]()
You mean like her mischaracterizing what she did?.........At no point did she say what the tweeters claimed she said.
Thus, the mischaracterization
Would you if you were in her britches?At no point did she say what the tweeters claimed she said.
Can't make this **** up.
I've already said, I don't love what AT did say.You mean like her mischaracterizing what she did?.........
Truth.
Can't make this **** up.
Take your pick. Too many situations have happened and almost all of them involve Clark, yet the W does nothing about it. They give her technicals for nothing and never rescind them. They install freedom of movement fouls that only Clark does not benefit from. They use bench players in game promos instead of Clark. They leave her off the 30 year poster. She’s the biggest draw in the league, by far, yet the league tries to distance themselves from her. If that’s not a bias against her, then I don’t know what is.Then I'll never know what it is you're referring to.
Certainly something concrete must have happened to lead you to say such a thing
And what message is that?You don’t have to have it to adopt its message. Which you have.,
History matters…so someone who gets caught robbing stores four times should get the same punishment as someone who did it once?1. Not severe enough, based on what? Anything other than AT's history?
2. What does AT's history have to do with CC?
Can't make this **** up.
I never said it doesn'tHistory matters…so someone who gets caught robbing stores four times should get the same punishment as someone who did it once?
Unfortunately Sophie and Bonner have their own History. Most of her actions had nothing to do with that game. Bonner like Thomas has a history as an antagonist, and her "walking out' on the Fever last year certainly gained her no love lost from the players or fans of the team.And I'd venture to say, things wouldn't have gotten as bad for CC in the 2nd game vs Phoenix, had Sophie not had been trolling in the first game.
I'd say Sophie's behavior lately has been the opposite of an enforcer. Pretty unfortunate
Are you OK, bro? I feel like your dog just died.Take your pick. Too many situations have happened and almost all of them involve Clark, yet the W does nothing about it. They give her technicals for nothing and never rescind them. They install freedom of movement fouls that only Clark does not benefit from. They use bench players in game promos instead of Clark. They leave her off the 30 year poster. She’s the biggest draw in the league, by far, yet the league tries to distance themselves from her. If that’s not a bias against her, then I don’t know what is.