One school shooting is too many. But i dont think understanding the definitions you are using in this "debate" is too much to ask. If you want debate, then lets have the debate.
If all you want to do is rail on one political party and scream "We have to do something" then dont worry about the finer points of the discussion.
If you'd bothered to actually read what I posted, it's posted in plain text on the study.
[1] Public mass shootings are incidents in a public or populated location involving at least some victims who were targeted at random and/or for their symbolic value.
Public attacks exclude a family or felony mass shooting, as well as incidents involving state-sponsored violence, battles over sovereignty, or organized terrorism. While these other attacks are equally tragic to public incidents, they are inherently different forms of the phenomenon.
[2] Completed mass shootings are incidents involving four or more victim fatalities. Large-scale global examinations often use the completed criteria to avoid missing cases, which can skew comparisons across countries.
[3] The number of public mass shootings in each of these countries between 2000 and 2022 included 21 in Russia, 9 in Yemen, 8 in the Philippines, and 8 in Uganda.
[4] These comparative countries similar to the United States are drawn from the
United Nations’ criteria for “developed countries.”
[5] After the three incidents in Finland, the
Finnish government issued new firearm guidelines for handguns and revolvers, which were the primary firearms during these attacks. Applicants for handgun licenses must now be active gun club members and vetted by their doctor and law enforcement.
[6] This data excludes the January 2015 and November 2015 shootings in France, which were perpetrated by organized terrorist groups.
[7] The term “assault weapons” commonly refers to semiautomatic or automatic firearms.