So what am I just supposed to bite my tongue while I watch my university bury themselves in even more debt and negotiate against themselves for a coach who has done nothing at all in the last decade to warrant a HC opportunity besides being named Greg schiano? Nope that’s the idea of a message board is discussion, not my problem you don’t like my opinion. We’ll see in a few years whose right, but either way the point is hopefully in a few years when we’re on another coaching search we’ll actually consider an up and comer whose currently a HC at a smaller school who has proven the ability to win with creative offenses and hardnose defenses. You know, like we should have done this time around. But instead because this program has so little interest from current students and recent alumni that we just hired back the guy that the old heads or ‘boomers’ remember from 15 years ago just to appease them.
There is absolutely nothing in the last decade that anyone can point to and say, ‘this is why Greg will be a great coach for us!’.... it’s 100% a nostalgia hire. It’s extremely similar to lovie smith at Illinois and chip kelly at ucla, but hey keep on dreaming! Maybe you’ll be right and I’m wrong about all of this. Like I said, save my posts!