Here is what I don't like.
Scott seems to take a laissez-faire approach to coaching the team.
What I mean by this, is he will make statements like the team is actually in charge of how good they are going to be. He will say things like, I've never been part of a team like that before.. as if he is questioning the players resolve to play and leaving that up to them.
I know it's not 97, and maybe things used to be like that, but clearly there isn't the right upper class leadership to leave things up to the kids right now.
Bo would have put his boot in some asses, and made things happen. Scott shrugs his shoulders and punts like, well if they don't want to be that good, then it's on them type of thing.
I also think Scott might be a little too close to the program to be objective. When coaching at another place, he's not thinking of Tom looking over his shoulder or the fan scrutiny like he has here, so Scott might not be doing things the same way as if he were somewhere else.
In either case, he's got to deal with it, and he's getting paid big money to do it.
If he doesn't produce, you have to consider getting someone else who can, and there is always someone else willing to step up and take a swing at it.
I appreciate your take. I’m bothered mostly by his play calling and lack of focus on special teams. Very similar to those college basketball coaches who don’t care about free throw shooting.. but anyways, the honeymoon is over. Frost has to start delivering a better product. He has to find a way to make it to a bowl this next year under a very difficult schedule. The good news is that both areas that I’m very bothered by, Frost addressed it this offseason.