Which is waaaaaaaayyyy off from what the admin/Congress predicted. Such a robust economy and flat revenues? YikesRevenue is about the same as it was prior to tax cuts. Spend less.
Spending needs gutted, regardless of revenues. No argument here.
Which is waaaaaaaayyyy off from what the admin/Congress predicted. Such a robust economy and flat revenues? YikesRevenue is about the same as it was prior to tax cuts. Spend less.
You'll have a more productive time talking to a lamp post.you nailed that one
Revenue is about the same as it was prior to tax cuts. Spend less.
lmao. Wanna bet?the republicans held all the purse strings the last 2 years and did nothing but massively increase the debt......
Can't blame that on the dems
You'll have a more productive time talking to a lamp post.
the republicans held all the purse strings the last 2 years and did nothing but massively increase the debt......
Can't blame that on the dems
You'll have a more productive time talking to a lamp post.
I just get a kick how he keeps three of four talking points in his back pocket and inserts them into any topic. Then asks crazy-*** questions to prove his point.
But the tax cuts they all voted against which allowed you to keep more of the money you earned you cannot complain about.
Revenues to the treasury are not down as a result of those tax cuts. YOU kept your crumbs. So what are YOU complaining about?
I feel like I am trapped in this odd, circular universe where no matter what I type, the topic returns to a set of right-wing talking points.......
Message to you and the rest of the Left. Be prepared to offer better solutions to the very things you complain about. Otherwise you just sound like a bunch of whiny little bitches who can't have their way.
the republicans held all the purse strings the last 2 years and did nothing but massively increase the debt......
Can't blame that on the dems
I know of a whiny little ***** in the White House that ain't getting his way! lmfao. Gonna be fun once Pelosi gets hold of that gavel.Message to you and the rest of the Left. Be prepared to offer better solutions to the very things you complain about. Otherwise you just sound like a bunch of whiny little bitches who can't have their way.
I know of a whiny little ***** in the White House that ain't getting his way! lmfao. Gonna be fun once Pelosi gets hold of that gavel.
I don't disagree.
I know of a whiny little ***** in the White House that ain't getting his way! lmfao. Gonna be fun once Pelosi gets hold of that gavel.
Two big spending liberals (Don & Nancy)? My guess is they'll invent meaningless partisan squabbles while greatly increasing our spending.I can't stand her but I also can't wait to see what she does to Trump It is like working in the ER on New Year's Eve......you know bad stuff is coming but you never know how bad.
Two big spending liberals (Don & Nancy)? My guess is they'll invent meaningless partisan squabbles while greatly increasing our spending.
LOL!!! You and your ilk are failing miserably. No replacement of Obamacare (the better and cheaper plan Trump had......that he never had) and no 30 foot concrete wall (even though Trump has many friends in the construction business). Debt is skyrocketing. The market Trump so glowingly attributed to his policies is crashing. GDP won't be the promised 4-5%. Your boy's cabinet is a mess and his kids may get indicted. Brown kids imprisoned at the border.
And don't forget, the evangelicals enable a multi-time adulterer, tax cheat, chronic liar, and likely law breaker.........I still can't get over that.
I am not an economist
now we are in the muck of less than predicted tax revenues and reckless spending when we should be paying down our debt at a massive rate (in a growing economy)
In case you haven't noticed Obama care and it's debt ridden entitlement unfunded mandates is unconstitutional. No need to repeal it. It'll be replaced by something lawful.
If you think a 16 trillion dollar stock market is crashing you're more ignorant than the Socialists who think Venezuela is better.
The Wall will be built..whether Democrats starve as a result of the shutdown or not. Let's see what spending cuts Nancy and Dems offer to control our deficit spending, I'll guarantee if it's not gutting the armed forces (which Leftists love alnost as much as taxpayer financed abortions) Trump will sign those cuts and increase them.
Whatever GDP ends up this year it'll be better than 3.0% which is something Obama who you dolts on the Left claim is responsible for this current GDP could never produce in any one year on his own. Trump's cabinet has been drained of swamp dwellers and mal contents who would rather be working for Hillary and paying back her favors to Foreigners who bought access to her during the '16 campaign while she tried to blame Russians for her unexpected defeat (still looking for all that collusion btw). The only Brown kids in prison at tje border are with their Parents who tried to break into the country illegally or weren't bused off to Democrat sponsored "sanctuary cities". And you guys elected Bill Clinton twice even after he was impeached for lying to Federal prosecutors, & having an adulterous affair inside the White House.
Again, don't complain about sh*t you either can't fix or already have sanctioned OM1. That's what whinny little bitches do. [winking]
Hope that growth outpaces interest rates while keeping inflation in check. Luckily our monetary policies are outstanding (the Fed). The more likely scenario is the spending will depress our growth, but not to the point of recession. Of course one wind gust the wrong way and it all falls down.I am not an economist but how can the US now increase spending without tax increases and without throwing the economy onto recession?
Sometimes I wonder how you made it through grammar school...... Your ability to rationalize anything and turn on a dime is truly amazing
So you cut spending.
I wonder how you post on this board with a straight face? Your ability to lie, hide from what you believe, or just make up sh*t is truly astounding because it's so obvious yet you persist.
tell me what happens when you cut federal spending?
I'll give you a primer. I know you can't grasp this but I'll try anyway. Trump was highly critical of Obama's GDP, So in order to improve GDP while he is in office, he increased spending massively (drives GDP up) and he cut taxes massively (drives GDP up). Combined, these two MASSIVE economic stimulants might get us to 3.0 GDP in 2018. Yippee. We wreck future growth by increasing spending and reducing taxes just for the president's ego in order to say he achieved higher GDP growth that Obama. (PS by some accounts the two stimulants together added about as much as 1.6% to the 2018 GDP....again Yippee)
So if you cut spending ATL, it generally hits GDP negatively. The government buys less so GDP should go down to a degree all things being equal. There is no chance that Trump is going to allow spending cuts because the GDP for 2019 is projected for very Obama-like 2.6-2.9% growth with increased spending. I think even the idiot Trump can see that reduced government spending could drive that number down further. He won't stand for that. So therefore, you won't see any significant reduction in government spending.
Understand?
So what does or did the Left offer as an alternative? The economy is not dependent on Government deficit spending. It grows despite that OM1. Wouldn't it be nice if we had a Governent run on economic reality like the private sector?
tell me what happens when you cut federal spending?
I'll give you a primer. I know you can't grasp this but I'll try anyway. Trump was highly critical of Obama's GDP, So in order to improve GDP while he is in office, he increased spending massively (drives GDP up) and he cut taxes massively (drives GDP up). Combined, these two MASSIVE economic stimulants might get us to 3.0 GDP in 2018. Yippee. We wreck future growth by increasing spending and reducing taxes just for the president's ego in order to say he achieved higher GDP growth that Obama. (PS by some accounts the two stimulants together added about as much as 1.6% to the 2018 GDP....again Yippee)
So if you cut spending ATL, it generally hits GDP negatively. The government buys less so GDP should go down to a degree all things being equal. There is no chance that Trump is going to allow spending cuts because the GDP for 2019 is projected for very Obama-like 2.6-2.9% growth with increased spending. I think even the idiot Trump can see that reduced government spending could drive that number down further. He won't stand for that. So therefore, you won't see any significant reduction in government spending.
Understand?
I never said that our economy is/was dependent on deficit spending. I just simply stated that increased spending can positively impact GDP.
You asked what the Dems offer as an alternative? We can start by stating the fact that Obama was reducing deficit spending his last 5-6 years in the white house. That was reality.
tell me what happens when you cut federal spending?
I'll give you a primer. I know you can't grasp this but I'll try anyway. Trump was highly critical of Obama's GDP, So in order to improve GDP while he is in office, he increased spending massively (drives GDP up) and he cut taxes massively (drives GDP up). Combined, these two MASSIVE economic stimulants might get us to 3.0 GDP in 2018. Yippee. We wreck future growth by increasing spending and reducing taxes just for the president's ego in order to say he achieved higher GDP growth that Obama. (PS by some accounts the two stimulants together added about as much as 1.6% to the 2018 GDP....again Yippee)
So if you cut spending ATL, it generally hits GDP negatively. The government buys less so GDP should go down to a degree all things being equal. There is no chance that Trump is going to allow spending cuts because the GDP for 2019 is projected for very Obama-like 2.6-2.9% growth with increased spending. I think even the idiot Trump can see that reduced government spending could drive that number down further. He won't stand for that. So therefore, you won't see any significant reduction in government spending.
Understand?
You asked what the Dems offer as an alternative? We can start by stating the fact that Obama was reducing deficit spending his last 5-6 years in the white house. That was reality.
I just simply stated that increased spending can positively impact GDP.
Just like revenue, spending isn't a 0 sum game. tax rates decrease, revenue stays the same. Just because government doesn't spend as much, doesn't mean the GDP goes down. This isn't 8th grade algebra, it's real math.
And I said GDP is not dependent on government spending particularly deficit spending. The economy grows regardless of whether government spends within its means or wastes what it is allowed to spend based on revenues generated by the private sector.
here is what I said, "So if you cut spending ATL, it generally hits GDP negatively." There was no intent on my part to say or imply it was perfectly correlated or that GDP would go down. In fact this is the best time to reduce spending because the economy can absorb it.
Break it down even further, and a growing population can actually force and economy to expand......Maybe we need more brown people??????
We agree then. Cut spending. Keep taxes low so the economy can continue growing adding additional revenue to the treasury as it usually does when taxes are cut.
Don't have a better solution? Stop complaining about the policy we're currently following.
WV Sports
Rick Trickett won't lower the bar for anybody on his offensive line
WV Sports
West Virginia looks for improved play on defensive front
WV Sports
West Virginia fall camp is here. Join WVSports.com for 75% off
WV Sports
Why Finley Bizjack believes this WVU team has the talent to be good
WV Sports
How new revenue streams are paying off for WVU athletics