Ukraine

kidmike41

All-American
Dec 29, 2005
3,525
5,853
113
Imagine if Mexico super sized their military and then tried to take back the southwest states by force. Would all these folks who wanted Ukraine to give up land to end a war they didn't start want us to give up the southwest to end a war we didn't start?
We would light them up.
 

GesterHawk

Heisman
Jan 3, 2023
19,579
38,249
113
We would light them up.
And this is one of the things I have noticed about many, if not most, conservatives - they lack circumstantial empathy. They don't have the ability to suspend their own biases and beliefs in order to put themselves in someone else's shoes.

What if Mexico super sized their military and had China's full backing.

Would you give up the southwest states to end that war that the USA didn't start, or would you want to fight back to protect the lives and interests of America?
 

kidmike41

All-American
Dec 29, 2005
3,525
5,853
113
And this is one of the things I have noticed about many, if not most, conservatives - they lack circumstantial empathy. They don't have the ability to suspend their own biases and beliefs in order to put themselves in someone else's shoes.

What if Mexico super sized their military and had China's full backing.

Would you give up the southwest states to end that war that the USA didn't start, or would you want to fight back to protect the lives and interests of America?
What are you talking about. We should defend our territory. Ukraine is of no concern to me. Let them give up territory or die trying to keep it. Stop sending them money. We have our own problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DailyBuck7

DailyBuck7

Junior
Mar 4, 2026
348
360
63
I don’t recall that. What where the details of that settlement?
Here are the details from Claude:

Ukraine could still pursue EU membership
Crimea's status would be deferred for 15 years of consultation
Major sticking points remained unresolved: Russia wanted Ukraine's military capped around 85,000 troops; Ukraine wanted 250,000. The fate of Donetsk and Luhansk was also unsettled.
Former Israeli PM Naftali Bennett, who was involved in the talks, has said Russia and Ukraine were willing to make major concessions to end the conflict until pressure from then-UK PM Boris Johnson convinced Zelensky to back away from the deal
 

DailyBuck7

Junior
Mar 4, 2026
348
360
63
And this is one of the things I have noticed about many, if not most, conservatives - they lack circumstantial empathy. They don't have the ability to suspend their own biases and beliefs in order to put themselves in someone else's shoes.

What if Mexico super sized their military and had China's full backing.

Would you give up the southwest states to end that war that the USA didn't start, or would you want to fight back to protect the lives and interests of America?
Totally ridiculous comparison. Russia is surrounded by numerous hostile States and the United States welshed on an agreement not to expand NATO. We are expending Ukrainian lives to support geopolitical goals that have very little to do with the ukraine. There are numerous places all over the world where there are border disputes. They are not our concern. Right now the Ukrainian Russian war resembles world War I stalled trench warfare in the sense that no real progress is being made on either side and lives are being wasted.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
Dec 4, 2001
4,887
15,762
113
Totally ridiculous comparison. Russia is surrounded by numerous hostile States and the United States welshed on an agreement not to expand NATO. We are expending Ukrainian lives to support geopolitical goals that have very little to do with the ukraine. There are numerous places all over the world where there are border disputes. They are not our concern. Right now the Ukrainian Russian war resembles world War I stalled trench warfare in the sense that no real progress is being made on either side and lives are being wasted.
Russia can leave at Ukraine at any time and this will be over.
 
Last edited:

Anon1750875978

Heisman
Dec 26, 2018
7,672
13,274
113
Would have been over 4 or 5 years ago if Biden and Boris Johnson hadn't told Ukraine to reject a peace settlement. Think of how many people have lost their lives because of this.
Did you ever see the details if that proposed "peace settlement"?

Ukraine would have been screwed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed

Anon1750875978

Heisman
Dec 26, 2018
7,672
13,274
113
What are you talking about. We should defend our territory. Ukraine is of no concern to me. Let them give up territory or die trying to keep it. Stop sending them money. We have our own problems.
Explain the moves made in Venezuela?

Was that "defending our territory"?
You pick and choose your POV.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed

DailyBuck7

Junior
Mar 4, 2026
348
360
63
Russia can leave at Ukraine at any time and this will be over.
No it won't. Between China and Ukraine and the smaller hostile States, conflicts can break out at any time involving russia. Best for the United States to stay out of it unless our interest is so strong that it would make sense to send ground troops to protect our interest. It is in the best interest of the United States for Russia to be reasonably secure at its borders.
 

DailyBuck7

Junior
Mar 4, 2026
348
360
63
Did you ever see the details if that proposed "peace settlement"?

Ukraine would have been screwed.
See above my reference to Claude summary. Also, if Ukraine was willing to agree to it and save hundreds of thousands of lives of ukrainians, it is none of our business.
 

DailyBuck7

Junior
Mar 4, 2026
348
360
63
And this is one of the things I have noticed about many, if not most, conservatives - they lack circumstantial empathy. They don't have the ability to suspend their own biases and beliefs in order to put themselves in someone else's shoes.

What if Mexico super sized their military and had China's full backing.

Would you give up the southwest states to end that war that the USA didn't start, or would you want to fight back to protect the lives and interests of America?
Really rich of you to talk about empathy. What about the lives of hundreds of thousands of young ukrainians and Russians, who wouldn't be killing each other if not for the geopolitical manipulations of Europeans and the United States.
 

DFSNOLE_rivals

All-American
Sep 25, 2002
3,751
9,922
113
No it won't. Between China and Ukraine and the smaller hostile States, conflicts can break out at any time involving russia. Best for the United States to stay out of it unless our interest is so strong that it would make sense to send ground troops to protect our interest. It is in the best interest of the United States for Russia to be reasonably secure at its borders.
So, Russia started the war by attacking Ukraine but can't end it by ceasing hostilities? Interesting perspective.
 

fskillet

All-Conference
Mar 26, 2026
520
1,448
93
Really rich of you to talk about empathy. What about the lives of hundreds of thousands of young ukrainians and Russians, who wouldn't be killing each other if not for the geopolitical manipulations of Europeans and the United States.
This is some idiotic nonsense. Russia invaded Ukraine. Full stop. Trying to put the blame on other European nations, as well as Americans, is ridiculous.
 
Dec 4, 2001
4,887
15,762
113
No it won't. Between China and Ukraine and the smaller hostile States, conflicts can break out at any time involving russia. Best for the United States to stay out of it unless our interest is so strong that it would make sense to send ground troops to protect our interest. It is in the best interest of the United States for Russia to be reasonably secure at its borders.
When is the last time Russia was invaded before Ukraine did during this very war? China, Russia, and north Korea are in bed together.
 

DailyBuck7

Junior
Mar 4, 2026
348
360
63
When is the last time Russia was invaded before Ukraine did during this very war? China, Russia, and north Korea are in bed together.
World War II and they lost something like 20 or 30 million people' they are not in bed with China and have a real worry that China will try to take over their skimpily populated territory.
 

GesterHawk

Heisman
Jan 3, 2023
19,579
38,249
113
Really rich of you to talk about empathy. What about the lives of hundreds of thousands of young ukrainians and Russians, who wouldn't be killing each other if not for the geopolitical manipulations of Europeans and the United States.
This war rests at the feet of Putin.

It is odd how Republicans are willing to give Vlad so much benefit of the doubt.
 

DFSNOLE_rivals

All-American
Sep 25, 2002
3,751
9,922
113
I gave a citation, Google is your friend. It has been well known for three or four years.
None of these are citations.

Here are the details from Claude:

Ukraine could still pursue EU membership
Crimea's status would be deferred for 15 years of consultation
Major sticking points remained unresolved: Russia wanted Ukraine's military capped around 85,000 troops; Ukraine wanted 250,000. The fate of Donetsk and Luhansk was also unsettled.
Former Israeli PM Naftali Bennett, who was involved in the talks, has said Russia and Ukraine were willing to make major concessions to end the conflict until pressure from then-UK PM Boris Johnson convinced Zelensky to back away from the deal

See above my reference to Claude summary. Also, if Ukraine was willing to agree to it and save hundreds of thousands of lives of ukrainians, it is none of our business.
 
Dec 4, 2001
4,887
15,762
113
Well then we are both in agreement on this one. Russia lost 10 or 20% of its population in a time that is within the memory of people alive today. It would still be in their memory just like Pearl harbor and Normandy are in our memories today in the United states.
We are not in agreement. My point is that no one has invaded Russia in the past 80 years.
 

DailyBuck7

Junior
Mar 4, 2026
348
360
63
😂 Link to your "citation"? And I'm talking about your claim that the US agreed that NATO wouldn't expand eastward.
This is from Claude: "Gorbachev (1990): Declassified U.S., Soviet, German, French, and British documents show Secretary of State James Baker assured Gorbachev that if a united Germany stayed in NATO, there would be no extension of NATO's jurisdiction eastward. This wasn't just Baker — multiple Western leaders, including Bush, Kohl, Genscher, Thatcher, and Mitterrand, all conveyed similar assurances to Soviet leaders in 1990. Crucially, these assurances were never written into a formal treaty, though the record shows a clear pattern of communication from top Western officials creating a real expectation on the Soviet side."