I was thinking the 2-deeps were to be released today. Is that true? If yes, what time today?
I’d say it’s a guarantee.I sure hope the QB is listed as Brown OR Hecklinski, just so I can enjoy this board.
I hope they put OR McNamara just to **** with us.I sure hope the QB is listed as Brown OR Hecklinski, just so I can enjoy this board.
I suspect they will.I sure hope the QB is listed as Brown OR Hecklinski, just so I can enjoy this board.
From what I’ve been reading/listening too on articles/podcasts from the beat guys, Brown seems to have been better in the majority of practices so I’m expecting it to go that way.I sure hope the QB is listed as Brown OR Hecklinski, just so I can enjoy this board.
I hope we run a 2 QB system where the both line up shotgun right next to each other.I sure hope the QB is listed as Brown OR Hecklinski, just so I can enjoy this board.
They almost always do a night scrimmage the Saturday before game week. We normally hear thru the grapevine about what happens in that scrimmage, but oddly enough, it's been crickets so far.From what I’ve been reading/listening too on articles/podcasts from the beat guys, Brown seems to have been better in the majority of practices so I’m expecting it to go that way.
Kirk did say last week they would have 1 more “big practice” before game week, I assume that’s a scrimmage. I think it’s safe to assume that whoever is listed first performed better in that scrimmage.
No way in hell.I’d say it’s a guarantee.
Of course they know it, they're just not going to say it.No way in hell.
You went through spring drills and the start of fall practices.
It's impossible to not know your starting QB.
Gotta catch NIU off guard.Of course they know it, they're just not going to say it.
Hank 'n JeremyI sure hope the QB is listed as Brown OR Hecklinski, just so I can enjoy this board.
Why not disclose it?Of course they know it, they're just not going to say it.
KF added TE tooI sure hope the QB is listed as Brown OR Hecklinski, just so I can enjoy this board.
Based on the QB competition and the DL, I feel pretty strongly about one thing..............7-5
Absolutely unnecessary drama. Very un-Kirk like. He has to know the longer he goes without naming a starter the more he's going to get asked about it and I can't imagine he enjoys answering those questions.It’s never good going into a season without a starter named at quarterback. It’s too unsettling for a team with all the uncertainty and unnecessary drama. Just pick a godd@mn starter and if you’re wrong change it. This is one Ferentz tendency that has always bothered me.
Probably just wants to split playing time in the first two games. I don’t see the big dealAbsolutely unnecessary drama. Very un-Kirk like. He has to know the longer he goes without naming a starter the more he's going to get asked about it and I can't imagine he enjoys answering those questions.
I get it, the QB competition has been close. Just seems dumb to go into the season without naming a starter. Name a guy and let the offense rally around him.
Well you still can only start one QB, if you know you are going to use both QBs then name one the starterProbably just wants to split playing time in the first two games. I don’t see the big deal
Probably each get a half and then you go from there. Doesn’t matter who leads offWell you still can only start one QB, if you know you are going to use both QBs then name one the starter
Yes and imo time to do it was after kids day. Each had their fair shot up to that point it's obviously neck and neck and performances were much different. At that point you try to help offense build momentum and revisit it if you have too. Imo I think KF wants Brown to be starter and had results from the scrimmage been flipped Brown would be named starter by now.Absolutely unnecessary drama. Very un-Kirk like. He has to know the longer he goes without naming a starter the more he's going to get asked about it and I can't imagine he enjoys answering those questions.
I get it, the QB competition has been close. Just seems dumb to go into the season without naming a starter. Name a guy and let the offense rally around him.
Yes, it does.Doesn’t matter who leads off
I think he actually DOES enjoy messing with the message-board portion of the fan base.Absolutely unnecessary drama. Very un-Kirk like. He has to know the longer he goes without naming a starter the more he's going to get asked about it and I can't imagine he enjoys answering those questions.
I get it, the QB competition has been close. Just seems dumb to go into the season without naming a starter. Name a guy and let the offense rally around him.
It’s not about NIU.Against niu, not really
Lol. Seriously? You honestly think that?I think he actually DOES enjoy messing with the message-board portion of the fan base.
You could be right, I just think it messes with the rest of the offense. Different QBs have different tendencies, different pocket habits, different arm strength, different throwing styles, etc. I just think it makes more sense to go into the season with some continuity in those things for the OL, TEs, WRs, instead of making them get used to two "starters" who probably do those things differently.Probably just wants to split playing time in the first two games. I don’t see the big deal
And about 3 drives in fans would be calling to put the other guy in.You could be right, I just think it messes with the rest of the offense. Different QBs have different tendencies, different pocket habits, different arm strength, different throwing styles, etc. I just think it makes more sense to go into the season with some continuity in those things for the OL, TEs, WRs, instead of making them get used to two "starters" who probably do those things differently.
Hawkeye Report
Northern Illinois quarterback battle undecided ahead of Iowa
Hawkeye Report
Three questions for Iowa men's wrestling in 2026-27
Hawkeye Report
Former Hawkeye LHP Jared Simpson called up by the Washington Nationals
Hawkeye Report
LJ Phillips ready to bring hard running style to Kinnick
Hawkeye Report
Kenneth Merrieweather sees defensive line growth