Tucker update re Baylor

HagginHall1999

Heisman
Oct 19, 2018
16,137
28,711
113
What should happen if you sign Baylor...

PG- Wallace (15-20)/Wheeler (20-25)
SG- CJ (15-20)/Wallace (10)/Reeves (10-15)
3G- Baylor (25)/Livingston (10)/Reeves (5)
F- Toppin (20)/Collins (10)/Livingston (10)
C- Oscar (30)/Collins (5-10)/Ware (0-5)

This gives mins as follows:
Oscar- 30
Wallace- 25-30
Baylor- 25
Wheeler- 20-25
Livingston- 20
Toppin- 20
Reeves- 15-20
CJ- 15-20
Collins- 15-20
Ware- 0-5


Sign another shooter that is a combo guard. Take a few minutes from the guys who are playing 30...Baylor, Wallace and save their legs until rotation tightens...that is if the other guy can play.

May get Brooks back too and then we have way too many F's who can't stretch the floor again.

As much as I like the potential of Brooks and fact that he'd be a 4th year guy I just don't think there is room for Toppin/Collins/him barring some kind of injury.

Edit- since we signed Reeves this whole thing changed...I think we can still get Baylor but if we do I don't see anyone outside of Oscar playing 30mpg unless Cal is just hell bent on playing Wheeler that much.
 
Last edited:
Mar 13, 2004
14,745
12,925
0
I doubt Reeves signed up to come off the bench. He's gonna be this years Grady IMO, plays a ton of minutes and starts every game. I would not be surprised to see Livingston end up with a slightly larger role than Bryce Hopkins.
That would be the least playing time Cal has ever given a top 10 recruit, by a wide margin. Livingston will play, and play a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

DaDirtyLeb69

Heisman
Jan 4, 2022
44,526
70,974
113
Reeves was more likely UK's first choice. AR was more of a need than Scheierman due to the fact that not only is Reeves a shooter, but can facilitate. Baylor is more of a spot-up shooter that would hang around the three-point line waiting for a kick-out or a teammate to collapse the defense.

I don't understand the fact that some on here would have rather got BS than AR, or we are set if he comes. We have got to have guys that can get these guys open by penetrating and kicking it out, or we are just going to have everyone but Oscar standing at the three-point line covered up and not open. Sure you can run plays and have screens being made, but thar only works with a lot of moving parts and other intangibles that have to be correct.

Set shooters are useless without teammates that can find them and relieve the pressure from the defense for our guys beyond the arc.

I really like BS as a player, but from what I've seen, he is not the end-all that some are making him out to be. He is mainly a set shooter, but has the ability to create his own shot with a couple/few dribbles. I do not see much of him creating his own shot or driving past his defender and finishing at the rim.

Antonio Reeves was more important to get in our current roster situation, in my opinion. People should be happy we were able to get him. Scheierman would be a nice addition, too. You can't have too many shooters but you have guys that can get them the ball and not have their defender draped up their rear out on the three-point line.

Scorers and shooters are two completely different things.
The kid from SDSU is better at creating and with the ball in his hand than reeves is, he can create and playmake
 

FinnaGoHAM

Heisman
Nov 13, 2015
6,346
10,070
113
There is a quick way to read any and all articles on the Athletic without ever paying. I've been doing it off and on.

Simply open the link to any article you want to read, then do not scroll down. Quickly hit Ctrl A (selects all) then Ctrl C (copy) (not simultaneously, but one then the other). Move to a Word document and then hit Ctrl V (paste). Voila - the entire article is there for your reading pleasure (or displeasure, depending on your mood). This instruction is for a Microsoft PC/laptop, but I predict it would be similar for a Mac, just different key combinations (wife has a Mac but I never have tried it there).

If you scroll at all on an Athletic article, it will immediately pop up with the subscription required notice - blocking the entire content.
THIS MAN IS A GENIUS!!!
 

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
I really don’t see room for another rotation player with who is expected back and who is expected to come in.

Tshiebwe is a lock to start. Wheeler shouldn’t be, but is also a lock.

Toppin has two years in the system as a rotation player. He’ll play significant minutes.

Fredrick is going to play a big role, if healthy.

Collins came back and will likely see an increased role.

Wallace and Livingston are 5-stars. They’ll play.

Reeves didn’t sign on to sit the bench for his fifth year. He will be a rotation guy.

Ware reprises his role as Tshiebwe’s backup.

That’s a 9 man rotation, which is what Cal prefers. He probably gets Theiro as the 10th man/practice player because he probably won’t expect much PT as a Freshman.

I don’t see us adding another significant minutes a game type player unless one of the above mentioned guys leave.

We get Scheierman, expect someone to exit either now or midseason when they aren’t getting PT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KentuckyCat420

BassProCat

Heisman
Jan 5, 2017
12,149
27,937
81
What should happen if you sign Baylor...

PG- Wallace (20)/Wheeler (20)
SG- CJ (20)/Wallace (10)/Baylor (10)
3G- Baylor (20)/Livingston (20)
F- Toppin (25)/Collins (15)/Ware
C- Oscar (30)/Collins (5)/Ware (5)

Sign another shooter that is a combo guard. Take a few minutes from the guys who are playing 30...Baylor, Wallace and save their legs until rotation tightens...that is if the other guy can play.

May get Brooks back to and then we have way too many F's who can't stretch the floor again.

As much as I like the potential of Brooks and fact that he'd be a 4th year guy I just don't think there is room for Toppin/Collins/him barring some kind of injury.
Forgot reeves
 

qwesley

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
17,606
23,461
0
That would be the least playing time Cal has ever given a top 10 recruit, by a wide margin. Livingston will play, and play a lot.
Skal played 15mpg and had a few DNPs. Whitney played 13mpg. Of course both got more opportunity than they deserved so I know Livingston will too but the pressure is on and if we have depth and he kills spacing around Oscar he might not play more than 15 or so.
 
Mar 13, 2004
14,745
12,925
0
Skal played 15mpg and had a few DNPs. Whitney played 13mpg. Of course both got more opportunity than they deserved so I know Livingston will too but the pressure is on and if we have depth and he kills spacing around Oscar he might not play more than 15 or so.

True, he could get a diminished role if he doesn't perform. But looking at the list of guys in that ~#10 recruit range we've had, the majority have been major contributors.
 

Wildcats1st

Heisman
Sep 16, 2017
18,949
28,911
0
But Cal does have this weird habit recently of not using his bench.

PG - Wheeler/Wallace
SG - Wallace/CJ
SF - Livingston/Reeves
PF - Brooks/Collins/Toppin
C - Oscar/Ware

Add in Baylor, and I have a feeling a few of these guys won't see time, unless Cal makes this adjustment.
If Baylor were to come which he won’t with a 10 team list but if you want to have a shot at landing him you pitch this.

wallace/wheller
Baylor/cj
Livingston/Baylor
Toppin/collins/Livingston
Oscar
 
Last edited:

Wildcats1st

Heisman
Sep 16, 2017
18,949
28,911
0

probaby rotate him off the bench at the 2/3. That’s 4 players who can play the 2/3. But if cal wants Baylor someone is gonna become dontaie allen. I could see cj being that guy just bc but honestly it would have to be Reeves if you want Baylor. No way you beat out those 10 teams to make Baylor the 6th 7th 8th guy. Ultimately if he were to come he would be recruited to play over several guys
 

DaDirtyLeb69

Heisman
Jan 4, 2022
44,526
70,974
113
I really don’t see room for another rotation player with who is expected back and who is expected to come in.

Tshiebwe is a lock to start. Wheeler shouldn’t be, but is also a lock.

Toppin has two years in the system as a rotation player. He’ll play significant minutes.

Fredrick is going to play a big role, if healthy.

Collins came back and will likely see an increased role.

Wallace and Livingston are 5-stars. They’ll play.

Reeves didn’t sign on to sit the bench for his fifth year. He will be a rotation guy.

Ware reprises his role as Tshiebwe’s backup.

That’s a 9 man rotation, which is what Cal prefers. He probably gets Theiro as the 10th man/practice player because he probably won’t expect much PT as a Freshman.

I don’t see us adding another significant minutes a game type player unless one of the above mentioned guys leave.

We get Scheierman, expect someone to exit either now or midseason when they aren’t getting PT.
There adding somebody else the interest in the SDSU kid should tell everybody that, I also wouldn’t be shocked if they tried to get the kid from Chattanooga
 
  • Like
Reactions: bookerfan66

Chaisey

Heisman
Nov 19, 2018
12,608
14,179
113
Reeves was more likely UK's first choice. AR was more of a need than Scheierman due to the fact that not only is Reeves a shooter, but can facilitate. Baylor is more of a spot-up shooter that would hang around the three-point line waiting for a kick-out or a teammate to collapse the defense.

I don't understand the fact that some on here would have rather got BS than AR, or we are set if he comes. We have got to have guys that can get these guys open by penetrating and kicking it out, or we are just going to have everyone but Oscar standing at the three-point line covered up and not open. Sure you can run plays and have screens being made, but thar only works with a lot of moving parts and other intangibles that have to be correct.

Set shooters are useless without teammates that can find them and relieve the pressure from the defense for our guys beyond the arc.

I really like BS as a player, but from what I've seen, he is not the end-all that some are making him out to be. He is mainly a set shooter, but has the ability to create his own shot with a couple/few dribbles. I do not see much of him creating his own shot or driving past his defender and finishing at the rim.

Antonio Reeves was more important to get in our current roster situation, in my opinion. People should be happy we were able to get him. Scheierman would be a nice addition, too. You can't have too many shooters but you have guys that can get them the ball and not have their defender draped up their rear out on the three-point line.

Scorers and shooters are two completely different things.
Sounds like you didnt read his scouting report ,he is crafty and can create offense, is word for word ,what it says ,now I understand why you think he is a spot up shooter,but he is way more then that ,he also is a great rebounder ,for a guard /SF and got good size, and great IQ....everyone in the country is on this kid that tells you what they think of him.
 
Last edited:

ruppsrunt1

All-Conference
Jun 14, 2014
909
1,997
93
sharpe is the top 10 draftee with the LEAST minutes played at UK--ZERO

nada--0---none---bench only to be seen

Another record achieved by begok!!

rr :mad:
 

Chaisey

Heisman
Nov 19, 2018
12,608
14,179
113
Calipari has never preferred a long bench. He’s always preferred a short rotation consisting of, well, 6 guys actually. 2015 was an anomaly and Calipari didn’t want to do it. That’s why he shortened his rotation in the tournament. He was never going to run the platoon late.

It’s why I say 2015 was actually a pretty overrated Calipari team. A tournament rotation of the twins, WCS, and Lyles playing out of position is not close to one of the best teams he’s had here. I don’t even have it top 4.

I don’t see the point in counting most of the bench because in the tournament it’s 5 on 5 and our 5 wasn’t great. That team was doomed to fail.
That starting 5 while it could have been better with ullis and book starting was phenomenal. BIG KAT ,WILLIE long athletic freak ,Lyles was 6-10 and could knockdown open jumpers from 15 and the twins was pretty good as well so I don't see your point at all.
I roll eyes every time I see someone compare it to 2012. When they would compare it to 96 my whole body would roll.
 

Gromcat_rivals

Heisman
Jun 28, 2021
10,292
27,496
0
@ChaiseyD well agree to disagree. WCS was a complete no show in big games and also had huge liabilities on offense. The guy couldn’t even hit a layup.

Lyles was not 6’10 lol and he was out of position all year. He never really looked comfortable either.

KAT was solid and sure, it was a really good team. I just think they’re really overrated and the way Calipari coaches that team isn’t winning championships. When everything is accounted for I don’t rank them top 4 during the Calipari era alone.
 

Chaisey

Heisman
Nov 19, 2018
12,608
14,179
113
@ChaiseyD well agree to disagree. WCS was a complete no show in big games and also had huge liabilities on offense. The guy couldn’t even hit a layup.

Lyles was not 6’10 lol and he was out of position all year. He never really looked comfortable either.

KAT was solid and sure, it was a really good team. I just think they’re really overrated and the way Calipari coaches that team isn’t winning championships. When everything is accounted for I don’t rank them top 4 during the Calipari era alone.
38-1 is all I need to know ,yes we will no biggie, I think that team is great ! Willie I don't think ever tryed to lay it up he dunked everything that he didnt shoot a jump hook .Lyles is a legitimate 6-10 the nba has to list the correct size and he is 6-10.
 

Gromcat_rivals

Heisman
Jun 28, 2021
10,292
27,496
0
38-1 is all I need to know ,yes we will no biggie, I think that team is great ! Willie I don't think ever tryed to lay it up he dunked everything that he didnt shoot a jump hook .Lyles is a legitimate 6-10 the nba has to list the correct size and he is 6-10.

Lyles was not 6’10 at UK. Willie tried to create offense yes, but it was the worst offense we’ve seen from the big man spot at UK.

They were a really good team but overrated. I’ll take 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2014 over 2015 UK. And 3 out of those 4 went as far or better than ‘15, 2010 was a few minutes behind and we know why. I don’t even see how it’s debatable really. This isn’t a hard call.
 

itsaprocess

Junior
Mar 12, 2018
92
202
0
Reeves is going to start he didn’t come here to come off the bench he has three years experience and is a proven scorer, if we are lucky enough to get Baylor he starts also he is too versatile , gives us another ball handler , and can shoot. Wallace will get minutes at the point spelling Wheeler and some at the two depending on foul trouble and injury. CJ and Livingston will get time at the 2 and 3 there is plenty of time for all these guys and gives Cal a ton of options if he chooses to use them and that is a big if..I think Thiero would be a nice development piece to have around and he may not be a 5 star but he is better that most of you think.
 

Drcats2025

Heisman
Nov 13, 2012
8,005
15,964
93
Hey! We have a face for the name now! Who’s that guy you’re with? Just kidding man🤣

Actually when I saw the Avi, I thought it was Mbegcat, then I saw your handle. Maybe I’ll finally come out and put one up of me and my lady! Maybe 😁

Nice picture BTW👊🏻
Thanks man. Nice pic of you and yours, too. Good looking couple!
 

Chaisey

Heisman
Nov 19, 2018
12,608
14,179
113
Lyles was not 6’10 at UK. Willie tried to create offense yes, but it was the worst offense we’ve seen from the big man spot at UK.

They were a really good team but overrated. I’ll take 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2014 over 2015 UK. And 3 out of those 4 went as far or better than ‘15, 2010 was a few minutes behind and we know why. I don’t even see how it’s debatable really. This isn’t a hard call.
Your right it really isn't much of a debate they were 38-1 bro,anyteam that is 38-1 is a great team! Lyles look him up in the media guide as well as his rookie yr in the nba .
 

HagginHall1999

Heisman
Oct 19, 2018
16,137
28,711
113
Lyles was not 6’10 at UK. Willie tried to create offense yes, but it was the worst offense we’ve seen from the big man spot at UK.

They were a really good team but overrated. I’ll take 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2014 over 2015 UK. And 3 out of those 4 went as far or better than ‘15, 2010 was a few minutes behind and we know why. I don’t even see how it’s debatable really. This isn’t a hard call.

I'd take '12, '10, '15 in that order Morg. '15 certainly wasn't better than '12. I'd have '17 breathing down their neck by end of season too.
 

Gromcat_rivals

Heisman
Jun 28, 2021
10,292
27,496
0
I'd take '12, '10, '15 in that order Morg. '15 certainly wasn't better than '12. I'd have '17 breathing down their neck by end of season too.

Probably the likely list, but I have a love affair with Randle. By far my favorite UK player under Calipari and - I think most dominant.

Given more thought, I’d have 12, then 10, then a tie between 15, 11, and 14 depending on whether I’m picking for a tournament or another way. My real point is just that we tend to overrate the POTENTIAL of the 2015 team (to be more accurate). I don’t think they win a title if given 5 chances. The issues with them as a “tournament team” were highly glossed over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HagginHall1999