Trump's tax cut....???

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
Disprove what I said. Somebody posts on Twitter and you can believe what they said? .....

Hilarious........coming from a person who uses Twitter posts from Trump and his cronies as validation of his successes, and his "innocence".....
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,292
6,985
113
lmao. Have a good one.
I'd rather have one country / one treaty, you are not stuck with a bunch of third world countries as a whole. easier to get what you want and what is fair. I guess that's why England wanted out of the EU. It was such a good deal.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,292
6,985
113
Hilarious........coming from a person who uses Twitter posts from Trump and his cronies as validation of his successes, and his "innocence".....
Idiot, I don't use twitter to validate. I can use the stock market, unemployment and worker participation. I don't have to use fake **** like those from the party of blackface.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,292
6,985
113
I’m some cases, sure. Think of TPP like NATO. We’d have been able to gang up on China and severely cripple them as a collective.
Well, I'm notsure we want another treaty like NAFTA that destroyed whole segments of some of our states. I live here in southwest Va and what happened to Martinsville, danville, NC, is devastating.
 

wvuphan

Freshman
Sep 8, 2007
10,771
53
0
I don’t disagree with the premise of the article, it’s cost me more money too.

But.....someone needs to tell the person who made the second tweet, that’s not how tax brackets work!!!!!!

It amazes me how financially illiterate a lot of people are. He probably turned down a bonus to avoid going into the next “tax bracket” as well
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
Well, I'm notsure we want another treaty like NAFTA that destroyed whole segments of some of our states. I live here in southwest Va and what happened to Martinsville, danville, NC, is devastating.
I don’t know that TPP would have been like NAFTA. I do know it would’ve allowed all of the countries China is most dependent on to be able to collectively regulate China’s actions and impose penalties etc. should China continue their currency manipulation and other unsavory business actions. In short, we wouldn’t be going the Trade War alone. We’d have Japan, Australia, and some other nations working with us. I’m strictly speaking upside here. There are likely some downsides to it as well. Weigh the costs and see what is most important. Play the long game.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
I don’t know that TPP would have been like NAFTA. I do know it would’ve allowed all of the countries China is most dependent on to be able to collectively regulate China’s actions and impose penalties etc. should China continue their currency manipulation and other unsavory business actions. In short, we wouldn’t be going the Trade War alone. We’d have Japan, Australia, and some other nations working with us. I’m strictly speaking upside here. There are likely some downsides to it as well. Weigh the costs and see what is most important. Play the long game.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,292
6,985
113
I don't site twitter but follow our golf coach, football coach, our
Because of a global slowdown in the economy.

No, increase in production due to cutting Obama's regs, increased cracking of natural gas to make the things that we use to use oil to make. We are the number 1 exporter now. What a wonderful thing capitalism is vs socialism by Ftards.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,292
6,985
113
I don’t know that TPP would have been like NAFTA. I do know it would’ve allowed all of the countries China is most dependent on to be able to collectively regulate China’s actions and impose penalties etc. should China continue their currency manipulation and other unsavory business actions. In short, we wouldn’t be going the Trade War alone. We’d have Japan, Australia, and some other nations working with us. I’m strictly speaking upside here. There are likely some downsides to it as well. Weigh the costs and see what is most important. Play the long game.
WE are playing the long game here. It would be a hell of a lot easier to just let things continue the way they were. China stealing everything they could and then line the pockets of the politicians after they leave office. Kinda like the Clinton Foundation. That's pretty much dried up now that she's not in a position to sell her country out.
 

boomerwv

Freshman
Jan 16, 2008
9,988
79
48
Overruled. We'll hear the witness. Tell us how Coop lied boomer?

It is the difference in tax rate cuts on their surface vs what you are going to actually owe when the old deductions are no longer available. Exactly what people are finding out now.

The tax cut was never meant to go to the middle class, it was meant to put more money into the pockets of the richest people in the country. It did that. Paul Ryan got what he wanted from the beginning and then left.

 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
WE are playing the long game here. It would be a hell of a lot easier to just let things continue the way they were. China stealing everything they could and then line the pockets of the politicians after they leave office. Kinda like the Clinton Foundation. That's pretty much dried up now that she's not in a position to sell her country out.
Sure. Look at it like this. What Trump is doing is one of a couple of ways to handle them. It’s not as efficient, and has collateral damage to us which I’d argue is less effective than other avenues he could take. Down sides to this is China is now incentivized to work more closely with Australia and Japan and give them better deals to offset our actions which would have a long term negative impact on the over trade balance and global economy.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,292
6,985
113
Sure. Look at it like this. What Trump is doing is one of a couple of ways to handle them. It’s not as efficient, and has collateral damage to us which I’d argue is less effective than other avenues he could take. Down sides to this is China is now incentivized to work more closely with Australia and Japan and give them better deals to offset our actions which would have a long term negative impact on the over trade balance and global economy.
I guess the question is, would Japan rather do business with us or China? Australia? We are still the largest economy.
 

boomerwv

Freshman
Jan 16, 2008
9,988
79
48
I don't site twitter but follow our golf coach, football coach, our


No, increase in production due to cutting Obama's regs, increased cracking of natural gas to make the things that we use to use oil to make. We are the number 1 exporter now. What a wonderful thing capitalism is vs socialism by Ftards.

Hardly. We are flooding the market with oil while demand slips. We saw this with natural gas a few years ago. Opec is cutting production and is happy to let US companies pour product into a weak market. Eventually it will it be sustainable. This almost caused a total collapse of us shale gas in 2015 and the same will happen with oil. Companies can't operate at the depressed price and are selling their reserves too cheap when they should be reducing output to save for better prices. It causes a lot of companies to go under.

Supply isn't causing lower prices. Other countries can reduce output to keep supply neutral and prices unchaged. It is demand that they can't control and that is what is slipping.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
I guess the question is, would Japan rather do business with us or China? Australia? We are still the largest economy.
That’s a very big question that encompasses more than just economic policy. China is on track to pass us. With TPP we had a mechanism to slow that down and force them to play by the same rules. Without it? It opens doors that would’ve otherwise been closed. Now, add in China’s aggressive expansionist posturing in the South China Sea, I think Japan is likely looking at China as the alligator closest to the boat. There are some cultural things there, in short, they hate each other culturally, but, that can easily be put aside by a couple trillion dollars of trade agreements. I swallow my pride all the time in business by understanding a $60 million deal closed is better than a $65 million deal in negotiation when the delay to execution is likely gonna eat up that $5 million delta.

We need to get China under control.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
It is the difference in tax rate cuts on their surface vs what you are going to actually owe when the old deductions are no longer available. Exactly what people are finding out now.

The tax cut was never meant to go to the middle class, it was meant to put more money into the pockets of the richest people in the country. It did that. Paul Ryan got what he wanted from the beginning and then left.

Your chart is showing exactly what it was designed and sold to do. It was designed increase profits for corporations who can and have been reinvesting it back into their businesses, through growth, IRAD, hiring, and compensation. You guys have bought full on into the evilness ******** of workers party propaganda.
 

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
Did you read the article?

And those people that own those businesses, who make more money, what do you suppose happens with that money? They put it in a fvcking Folgers can and bury it in the backyard? It spends you ignorant ****. We’re at 3.7% unemployment. People are working. There are over a million jobs available right now. Trickle down is working.

Tax revenues aren’t down. They’re flat or a little up the last time I checked, so we cut taxes and revenues stayed he same. Win.

Spending by the Govt is out of control. Want to cut spending? Let’s do it. I’ll be part of that mob. Want to rein in the deficit? I’ll have some of that.

Wage growth? Up. Win.

Corporate earnings? Up. Win.

Jobs? Plentiful. Win.

Individuals and Corporations paying less in taxes? Yes. Win.

Corporate reinvestment? Yes. Win.

Cut out the stupid fvcking trade war and we’d be en fuego right now.
 
Last edited:

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
Your chart is showing exactly what it was designed and sold to do. It was designed increase profits for corporations who can and have been reinvesting it back into their businesses, through growth, IRAD, hiring, and compensation. You guys have bought full on into the evilness ******** of workers party propaganda.

plain and simple, it was a middle class tax increase created by eliminating deductions and personal exemptions.

9 tax deductions individuals can no longer claim for their 2018 taxes - CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/9-tax-deductions-individuals-can-no-longer-claim-for-their-2018-taxes/
 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
plain and simple, it was a middle class tax increase created by eliminating deductions and exemptions like tuition.

9 tax deductions individuals can no longer claim for their 2018 taxes - CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/9-tax-deductions-individuals-can-no-longer-claim-for-their-2018-taxes/
And that is a big reason why I am seeing a large tax increase. Many more millions of people will also feel it. And in big tax states like California and New York, it is going to be huge. Just as designed by Trump and the GOP. Punish states with the highest proportions of Dems.

Wish the lawsuits have made more progress on the constitutionality of this tax cut legislation.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
plain and simple, it was a middle class tax increase created by eliminating deductions and personal exemptions.

9 tax deductions individuals can no longer claim for their 2018 taxes - CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/9-tax-deductions-individuals-can-no-longer-claim-for-their-2018-taxes/
You’re conflating stuff you don’t understand by posting links designed to not provide a comprehensive analysis. It’s cherry picking data to confuse and conflate issues for people like you.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
And that is a big reason why I am seeing a large tax increase. Many more millions of people will also feel it. And in big tax states like California and New York, it is going to be huge. Just as designed by Trump and the GOP. Punish states with the highest proportions of Dems.

Wish the lawsuits have made more progress on the constitutionality of this tax cut legislation.
Honest question, is your increase a result of your overall tax strategy? Could you change how you do things to have a more favorable impact under the new structure? The SALT was hashed repeatedly on here and we’re not in agreement. I do love your little conspiracy about the point being designed to punish states with high proportions of Dems. That’s classic.
 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
Conflating? My god, it is simple math how it is affecting millions as a tax increase. Somebody doesn't understand and it isn't tje
 

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
You’re conflating stuff you don’t understand by posting links designed to not provide a comprehensive analysis. It’s cherry picking data to confuse and conflate issues for people like you.

what exactly am I conflating?
 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
Honest question, is your increase a result of your overall tax strategy?

Honest answer: No. I lost a bunch of exemptions due to a large family coupled with almost $22000 worth of deductions and it was replaced with a Standard Deduction of $24000. This increases my Taxable Income dramatically over something that is directly related to the legislation and I have zero control over it. This accounts for about 90% of my Effective Tax Rate going up 35%. That is a large tax increase. Agree?