The New Lounge

[Mac9192]

Oscar worthy

Nice to see you back and in rare form. Have you not also read where I want the files released? Do you even understand what has been discussed though? I thought of the three of you, you are the most rational. One of your pals called the movie highly fictionalized, but has said nothing about the actual issue, and he’s a teacher of children. Let that sink in. Don’t be just a suck up to him. The other one? He has a hard on for Trump and Epstein. Totally in the tank.

How would you feel if you knew someone that got abducted? Would you still play party politics? Maybe you aren’t playing with a full deck though. If so, you fit in with the other two.

 

[DuckDevil]

Right or wrong, .... wasn't the files sealed during the 21-25 period because of the Maxwell case???....and it was Trump so hell bent on using it as a campaign ploy to generate support, then all a sudden, yeah all thats nothing I was ranting about, its fake news, nobody harmed????

There’s some nuance to this. If you go back before the election, everyone but Trump was talking nonstop about releasing the files. Vance, Patel, Bongino, all of them. But if you watch the times Trump was asked directly about it, he was lukewarm to the idea at best. He was always noncommittal about it and would generally pivot to something else. It was the only thing he was like that on as well.

In retrospect, it makes perfect sense why he acted that way considering the stuff we’ve already seen from the first half of the files. He knew he was in there, and that it would be pretty damning. I also generally believe that the others had no idea he was in them until they had direct access to the files themselves. To be a fly on the wall the first time they read that stuff…

 

[BOOGIEMAN1914]

Nice to see you back and in rare form. Have you not also read where I want the files released? Do you even understand what has been discussed though? I thought of the three of you, you are the most rational. One of your pals called the movie highly fictionalized, but has said nothing about the actual issue, and he’s a teacher of children. Let that sink in. Don’t be just a suck up to him. The other one? He has a hard on for Trump and Epstein. Totally in the tank.

How would you feel if you knew someone that got abducted? Would you still play party politics? Maybe you aren’t playing with a full deck though. If so, you fit in with the other two.

I honestly feel, you are just saying that part about wanting the files released, no you don't, cause the results would most likely be what you dont want to see/know imo.....Movie critics have called it highly fictionalized, he was repeating that iirc....you took the dive down human trafficking, we all agree its BAD....but like Duck said, you have this passion for human trafficking, great....but Epstein and possible ties, you seem to just shrug it off imo.....if I knew someone that got abducted, politics has no play in the crime that had been committed, I would want all the justice according to the law

 

[BOOGIEMAN1914]

There’s some nuance to this. If you go back before the election, everyone but Trump was talking nonstop about releasing the files. Vance, Patel, Bongino, all of them. But if you watch the times Trump was asked directly about it, he was lukewarm to the idea at best. He was always noncommittal about it and would generally pivot to something else. It was the only thing he was like that on as well.

In retrospect, it makes perfect sense why he acted that way considering the stuff we’ve already seen from the first half of the files. He knew he was in there, and that it would be pretty damning. I also generally believe that the others had no idea he was in them until they had direct access to the files themselves. To be a fly on the wall the first time they read that stuff…

Hmmmm...and he also knew it was red meat to the base and he used it to his benefit, while I believe knowing he all up in it....i find it HARD to believe, someone as rich and powerful as him has a friend that indulges in that and he knows absolutely he doesn't take advantage of that opportunity, when basically he has already said the grab by the p, I just do what I want, when you are a star, and etc..., now he has a friend that can basically make anything happen at anytime....???....i dont buy it

 

[Mac9192]

I honestly feel, you are just saying that part about wanting the files released, no you don't, cause the results would most likely be what you dont want to see/know imo.....Movie critics have called it highly fictionalized, he was repeating that iirc....you took the dive down human trafficking, we all agree its BAD....but like Duck said, you have this passion for human trafficking, great....but Epstein and possible ties, you seem to just shrug it off imo.....if I knew someone that got abducted, politics has no play in the crime that had been committed, I would want all the justice according to the law

What movies based on actual events don’t get spiced up some? You’re refusing to see the forest for the trees in front of you though. I don’t care what critics said about it. I never base my watching a movie on what they think.

On the Epstein files? You couldn’t be more wrong. What you’re doing is projecting here. You play party politics, so you assume I do. That couldn’t be further from the truth. I’ve been very clear. Release the Epstein files. Personally though, I think the three of you would be in for a shocker.
Your party has already established themselves as clinically insane, so acts with minors wouldn’t surprise me. I do think many guys you three have always admired are on that list. Is Trump? I don’t think so, but if he is, then he should pay.

Are you willing to do the same if guys from your team have done things with minors?