That was a Catch... Ruling was BULLSHIZZLE

[FunkyFatCan]

i've watched that amazing catch by Darby over and over again and I'm still not sure how they ruled that incomplete. I don't care that it moved a little during the catch, he was smoothly and absolutely in control of that catch. Instant Replay has been great for the sport but i also believe some of the catch rulings have been just stupid.

 

[Cowtown Cat]

That was an unbelievably bad reversal call! Maybe the most egregious I’ve ever seen.

 

[DonAndy]

That was an unbelievably bad reversal call! Maybe the most egregious I’ve ever seen.

In the end ball don't lie. Cats win!

 

[Cowtown Cat]

In the end ball don't lie. Cats win!

True. However, man, that was a TERRIBLE call! My goodness! WOOF!

 

[Dead Cat Bounce]

His hands were always under the ball. Mind-boggling reversal.

 

[BlueBloodKyFan72]

Hands under the ball with no evidence you CANT reverse that what a joke

 

[DonAndy]

True. However, man, that was a TERRIBLE call! My goodness! WOOF!

I actually didn't get to see that play. Assuming it was the first half? Was sleep for work

 

[bbnkat02]

Horrid call and o still wish Stein would call them out in it.

 

[Dead Cat Bounce]

Darby is the best Kentucky freshman since??? Almost 2:00 am here and I am still jacked over this win.

 

[DonAndy]

Darby is the best Kentucky freshman since??? Almost 2:00 am here and I am still jacked over this win.

Same. Wish more people were on to celebrate with lol. I'm stuck at work

 

[Cats_2010]

If I’m Stein I’m absolutely calling whoever I need to on Monday morning and raise holy hell over that reversal. It was one of the worst I’ve ever seen. Not a single Angle showed the ball ever touching the ground at all. It was a catch 10 times out of 10. That’s the kind of BS officiating you simply can’t let slide.

 

[rick64]

Certainly not conclusive video evidence to overturn the call on the field.

 

[preacherfan]

I actually didn't get to see that play. Assuming it was the first half? Was sleep for work

 

[bigblueinsanity (the real)]

It was absolutely a catch. Crazy they overturned it and even crazier they overturned it so quickly.

That was a signal as to who the league wanted to win this game. Too bad.

 

[JPFisher]

It was such a bad reversal that it made it on to a couple bad sports refs accounts

 

[kyhankypanky]

1. We are all homers, but that sure seemed like a catch - would love an objective person’s take. (The SC cheerleading announcers at that point even said it was a catch).

2. There is NO WAY there was enough evidence to overturn. I think if it had not been ruled a catch, there would have been enough evidence to call it a catch.

3. The fact that this was a review - where officials could gather themselves and ponder the ruling - makes me completely suspect that this wasn’t mere incompetence but blatant fixing. What else are you supposed to conclude?

 

[Littlecreek10]

1. We are all homers, but that sure seemed like a catch - would love an objective person’s take. (The SC cheerleading announcers at that point even said it was a catch).

2. There is NO WAY there was enough evidence to overturn. I think if it had not been ruled a catch, there would have been enough evidence to call it a catch.

3. The fact that this was a review - where officials could gather themselves and ponder the ruling - makes me completely suspect that this wasn’t mere incompetence but blatant fixing. What else are you supposed to conclude?

The on-field refs called it a catch, it’s whoever is reviewing it in whatever room somewhere that reversed it I assume.

 

[davtay]

The on-field refs called it a catch, it’s whoever is reviewing it in whatever room somewhere that reversed it I assume.

Probably the same bunch that added the mystery tenths of a second in the Michigan screw job earlier in the year.

 

[CGBlue1.0]

Great catch, and that play was one where the call on the field should stand. But I have no faith in that system and was not surprised when it got overturned.. And it'll be more of the same next Saturday night at home.

 

[rick64]

Such BS that the refs don’t have to answer to the press after a game and explain what they saw on the replay.

 

[Henogee1975]

I do think it touched the ground at some point but not until it was under control in his hands.

 

[FunkyFatCan]

I actually didn't get to see that play. Assuming it was the first half? Was sleep for work

worth a watch it was a thing of beauty. I'm now sober and still believe it was a catch. Not sure where they found evidence to overturn their original correct call. Maybe there were some NFL ref scouts at the game and they were trying to impress them xD

 

[DonAndy]

worth a watch it was a thing of beauty. I'm now sober and still believe it was a catch. Not sure where they found evidence to overturn their original correct call. Maybe there were some NFL ref scouts at the game and they were trying to impress them xD

did you get hammered yesterday lol

 

[FunkyFatCan]

1. We are all homers, but that sure seemed like a catch - would love an objective person’s take. (The SC cheerleading announcers at that point even said it was a catch).

2. There is NO WAY there was enough evidence to overturn. I think if it had not been ruled a catch, there would have been enough evidence to call it a catch.

3. The fact that this was a review - where officials could gather themselves and ponder the ruling - makes me completely suspect that this wasn’t mere incompetence but blatant fixing. What else are you supposed to conclude?

how quickly they reviewed and reversed was odd too you're right. Karma eventually self corrected but dayum

 

[DonAndy]

That's a catch. Especially if they ruled it a catch initially.