I gave you a like just because you had the guts to go against the current "...anti-Schiano mob ..." Think there's a lot of big mouths on these forums, who don't move the needle on hiring and firing, because they're not opening their wallets, and there's lots of reasons to still respect Schiano -- but, he's getting paid lots of money, too much in fact, underperformed, until last night seemed a bit stale, has had trouble pulling in assistants, and still remember him leaving Rutgers in lurch by running to the NFL like he did, taking a bunch of coaches with him. If he could just coach and get his guys to play like last night, and have better luck in the portal, all would be well. Still, probably too late for that ... my concern is the remaining length of his contract and not sold on some of the names thrown around as a replacement, but it's not my decision. Indeed he accomplished that for which he was hired, raising us from the Ash level futility.
Very excellent summary, and if I may pick up where you left off with Ash level of futility:
Has returned Rutgers to nearly the Ash level of futility.
Has NOT accomplished what he promised-bring championships to Rutgers---not even close, finishing highest of 5th in East when divisions were in place and 9th and tied for 14th in years 5 and 6. We have a saying in our office- better to under promise and over deliver than to over promise and under deliver.
Took full advantage of AD office being empty, loading up on auxiliary staff positions, including his three sons, raising the level of spending into the top 4 of B1G schools without anything to show for it.
Too many boneheaded game day decisions resulting in losses that have been detailed elsewhere.
Small quibble about "better luck in the portal"--no, better evaluation of portal targets. Maybe the real problem was poor evaluation and an unwillingness of players to come to Rutgers.
Touting Rutgers as a developmental football program. Terrible look for a program. Sounds enticing to whom?
Our wallet was wide open when he was rehired. Now, the wallet is nailed shut.
The saga of 1.0 and 2.0 is reminiscent of the old Gilda Radner Roseanne Roseannadanna character----It's always something, if it's not one thing, it's another. . . . it's the offense, now it's the defense, we are a developmental program, we are not there "yet", we were not vertically aligned. . . . .