OT: Gabe Kapler

Status
Not open for further replies.

Antnee79

Senior
Nov 7, 2017
318
584
0
I feel that Steve Kerr expressed that more directly, eloquently and effectively. Sadly, he has more credibility on the matter too. Kapler’s mild statement and ambiguous action isn’t going to inspire too many people.
I respectfully disagree, Pete. Kerr.s rant was about 50 senators blocking HR 8 from a vote in the senate. If Kerr had read the bill, he would know that the legislation would not have prevented the sale of the guns purchased. In addition, his position two years ago was to remove armed police presence from schools. His rant was simply an emotional reaction to a tragedy that now, after the facts have come to light, was in all probability preventable had the protocols post Columbine been implemented and properly executed. To me, he was neither eloquent or effective. School shootings can and should be preventable with proper safety procedures and effective policing. That should be the debate.
 

tom1944

All-American
Feb 22, 2008
6,596
6,972
0

Maybe someone could do the same at Wrigley
[/QUOTE]
They should both issues need to be addressed
 

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,841
16,113
0
Some really disgusting joke posts here. WTF is
I respectfully disagree, Pete. Kerr.s rant was about 50 senators blocking HR 8 from a vote in the senate. If Kerr had read the bill, he would know that the legislation would not have prevented the sale of the guns purchased. In addition, his position two years ago was to remove armed police presence from schools. His rant was simply an emotional reaction to a tragedy that now, after the facts have come to light, was in all probability preventable had the protocols post Columbine been implemented and properly executed. To me, he was neither eloquent or effective. School shootings can and should be preventable with proper safety procedures and effective policing. That should be the debate.
Sorry, this is more deflection. He was right. Dealing with these horrible incidents takes a multipronged approach. Mental health, early intervention, gun control laws (yeah I said it), better school security, etc. But the answer will never be arming teachers. Geez, I wonder if some folks understand what prep goes into being a good teacher. Now everyone wants teachers to be LEO.
 

tom1944

All-American
Feb 22, 2008
6,596
6,972
0
I respectfully disagree, Pete. Kerr.s rant was about 50 senators blocking HR 8 from a vote in the senate. If Kerr had read the bill, he would know that the legislation would not have prevented the sale of the guns purchased. In addition, his position two years ago was to remove armed police presence from schools. His rant was simply an emotional reaction to a tragedy that now, after the facts have come to light, was in all probability preventable had the protocols post Columbine been implemented and properly executed. To me, he was neither eloquent or effective. School shootings can and should be preventable with proper safety procedures and effective policing. That should be the debate.
It should be one part of the debate. It is a big enough issue to combat it from multiple paths.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbee3

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,641
86,640
113
Maybe someone could do the same at Wrigley
They should both issues need to be addressed
[/QUOTE]
When is someone going to take a stand on the unaddressed mental health issue in this country? Or maybe Kepler is killing two birds with one stone?
 

tom1944

All-American
Feb 22, 2008
6,596
6,972
0
Some really disgusting joke posts here. WTF is

Sorry, this is more deflection. He was right. Dealing with these horrible incidents takes a multipronged approach. Mental health, early intervention, gun control laws (yeah I said it), better school security, etc. But the answer will never be arming teachers. Geez, I wonder if some folks understand what prep goes into being a good teacher. Now everyone wants teachers to be LEO.
And before we hear but Chicago the cities need to combat gangs effectively
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbee3

tom1944

All-American
Feb 22, 2008
6,596
6,972
0
They should both issues need to be addressed
When is someone going to take a stand on the unaddressed mental health issue in this country? Or maybe Kepler is killing two birds with one stone?
[/QUOTE]
Mental health needs to be a huge factor, identifying those with the issue, effective treatment and gun control regulations that make sure they don’t get a gun
 

RUScrew85

Heisman
Nov 7, 2003
30,054
16,939
0
So you're saying if some aspects of the country work in his favor, he should shut up and be happy and not want to see the less desirable parts improve? Interesting take.
Like if a restaurant gave you a perfectly cooked steak for dinner. A $500 cut of meat. The perfect steak. And on the side, they gave you a steaming pile of ****. You just eat the **** because the restaurant gave you steak, and you should now trust them blindly. Definitely don't question why they're serving **** as a side.

Interesting take. And it makes no sense. What exactly does gabe's virtue signalling and dinner have to do with each other. Try again.
 

RUScrew85

Heisman
Nov 7, 2003
30,054
16,939
0
*wanton

Not this …


Let him go. He's on a roll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: czxqa

RUScrew85

Heisman
Nov 7, 2003
30,054
16,939
0
Eugene Sledge’s WW2 Diary, With The Old Breed”, depicting the horrors he and his fellow marines endured during the brutal battles of Pelelieu and Okinawa should be mandatory reading. I can’t understand how anyone can disrespect our flag and National Anthem after the sacrifices our veterans made for our freedom. Call me old fashioned but that’s what I believe in.

After that book, ya'll can move to "Helmet for my Pillow"
 

RUScrew85

Heisman
Nov 7, 2003
30,054
16,939
0
National Anthem protests have happened many many times in our country’s history
this is what I found
( storming the capital is only allowed by the British and traitors so that’s not considered protesting)

Refusal to stand during the national anthem became a widespread form of protest during World War I.

In 1943.there was an incident where college students in Philadelphia refused to stand because he custom was leading to "rabid nationalism".

In the 1960s, refusal to stand during the anthem took place for a number of reasons. In the late 1960s, the protest became increasingly common among athletes and at schools, both as an opposition to the Vietnam War and as a protest of nationalism.

One of John Wooden’s UCLA teams (1969) didn’t come out of the locker room during part of that season until after the National Anthem was over , Wooden denied that was because some of his players would refuse to stand during the playing of the National Anthem, bit it was reported the reason was because of a protest started over how some black University of Wyoming athletes were treated that was spreading across the country

That same year other college players protesting the same issue made their schools stay in the locker-room until the playing of the anthem was over because they were going to refuse to stand while it was being played

In 1996 a Denver Nugget player refused to stand during the playing of the Anthem because he felt America was treating his religion wrongly.


We all know of the kneeling and staying in the locker room by some NFL teams recently, so getting upset at Kapler is kind of ridiculous and just a way of saying if you want to protest >you can only protest the way I like it to be and not the way it usually has been over the years..

Is it OK if someone consistently thinks that type of protest is wrong all the time? Ya know, since you're the guy laying down the law? I noticed you skipped a detail about the 1996 protest, What was that religion?
 

RUScrew85

Heisman
Nov 7, 2003
30,054
16,939
0
Some really disgusting joke posts here. WTF is

Sorry, this is more deflection. He was right. Dealing with these horrible incidents takes a multipronged approach. Mental health, early intervention, gun control laws (yeah I said it), better school security, etc. But the answer will never be arming teachers. Geez, I wonder if some folks understand what prep goes into being a good teacher. Now everyone wants teachers to be LEO.

How does restricting the rights of law abiding gun owners help a situation where some crazy person shoots innocents?
 

Antnee79

Senior
Nov 7, 2017
318
584
0
Some really disgusting joke posts here. WTF is

Sorry, this is more deflection. He was right. Dealing with these horrible incidents takes a multipronged approach. Mental health, early intervention, gun control laws (yeah I said it), better school security, etc. But the answer will never be arming teachers. Geez, I wonder if some folks understand what prep goes into being a good teacher. Now everyone wants teachers to be LEO.
I never said anything about arming teachers. YOU said he addressed it ( the issue) more directly, eloquently and effectively. What did he say other than complaining about 50 senators blocking legislation that would not have prevented this tragedy? He also gave a statement before all the facts were revealed. Please explain how his statement was eloquent or effective? I am advocating for a national debate on a multi-faceted problem; Kerr called out one party for allegedly obstructing a bill that would have prevented this tragedy. Yet he is praised for pounding the table with indignation.
 
Last edited:

Colbert17!

Heisman
Aug 30, 2014
17,383
18,823
113
Another "Hey look at me, see how much I care" moment.
In the past two years gun violence in SF has increased by about 75% but I don't recall hearing him say anything about that. Only takes advantage of a horrific massacre like this to break out with SJW cred. Would respect him more if he just stayed in the clubhouse during the anthem and didn't feel the need to announce it.
 
Last edited:

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,641
86,640
113
Some really disgusting joke posts here. WTF is

Sorry, this is more deflection. He was right. Dealing with these horrible incidents takes a multipronged approach. Mental health, early intervention, gun control laws (yeah I said it), better school security, etc. But the answer will never be arming teachers. Geez, I wonder if some folks understand what prep goes into being a good teacher. Now everyone wants teachers to be LEO.
By early accounts, it looks like the school had school security, and the police were on the scene quickly. The local police had also recently completed training in active shooter incidents. Everything that could have gone wrong at Uvalde seems to have gone wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersdave

T2Kplus20

Heisman
May 1, 2007
31,822
19,804
113
It should be one part of the debate. It is a big enough issue to combat it from multiple paths.
I believe the shooter was arrested a year ago and was saying then he was going to shoot up the school.

I think we need juvenile justice reform. That kid should have been in jail and undergoing treatment for mental illness.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,641
86,640
113
I believe the shooter was arrested a year ago and was saying then he was going to shoot up the school.

I think we need juvenile justice reform. That kid should have been in jail and undergoing treatment for mental illness.
Wrong shooter. That was the Buffalo shooter. The police (and maybe the FBI?) interviewed him, he said he was kidding, and they let him go. There should be strict standards for people who own guns that if they express that they want to commit violence with guns, their guns should be taken away. This should not be a difficult concept, except for the NRA and the lawyers will be screaming about the Second and First Amendments.
 

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,841
16,113
0
I never said anything about arming teachers. YOU said he addressed it ( the issue) more directly, eloquently and effectively. What did he say other than complaining about 50 senators blocking legislation that would not have prevented this tragedy? He also gave a statement before all the facts were revealed. Please explain how his statement was eloquent or effective? I am advocating for a national debate on a multi-faceted problem; Kerr called out one party for allegedly obstruction a bill that would have prevented this tragedy. Yet he is praised for pounding the table with indignation.
The problem is that the group he called out never budges on this issue. C’mon man you know that. We have seen it every time. I actually agree with you on one aspect of this issue as I think the police were poorly trained leading up to this. Kerr is fine on this. Need to get people off their asses.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,445
16,281
113
Is it OK if someone consistently thinks that type of protest is wrong all the time? Ya know, since you're the guy laying down the law? I noticed you skipped a detail about the 1996 protest, What was that religion?
does the religion matter.????
If it does then freedom of religion in America only means the religions some Americans feel acceptable should have their Constitutional rights protected , the rest must be eliminated.
In case you didn't guess before asking> Muslim.

There was a country that the many of its citizens didn't care enough for the Jewish population there to stand up for the Jewish among them and allowed them to be eliminated without protest ;\We can't allow that to happen in the USA Keeping those capable of hurting/killing people because of their religion from making laws that would try and destroy a religion and the people that pratice it.
America should never look down on a religion, just hate the scumbags that use it to validate their killing innocent people.
Nor should we care about what religion is being oppressed , if one is, we should feel oppressing any religion is going against the Constitution of the United States and the moral code of the USA.

Feeling the way some ( peacefully) protest is wrong is something thsat is everyones right, just like others feeling there's nothing wrong they way that ( peaceful) protest is acceptable is a right all Americans should have.
Expecting everyone to agree with your POV on that protest is wrong , just like choosing a religion to hate is wrong.
Hating those who use religion to do terrorist acts shouldn't be considered a bad thing just like hurting the police protecting congress members, doing their job, should be considered a bad act by anti American scum
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletNut

RUScrew85

Heisman
Nov 7, 2003
30,054
16,939
0
does the religion matter.
If it does then freedom of religion in America only means the religions the majority of Americans feel acceptable to them.
In case you didn't guess before asking> Muslim.
There as a country that the majority of its citizans didn't care for the Jewish population enough to stand up for the Jewish among them.
America should never look down on a religion, just the way some scumbags use it to validate their hate. didn't care
Nor should we care about what religion is being oppressed , if one is, we should feel oppressing any religion is going against the Constitution of the United States and the moral code of the USA.

Feeling the way some ( peacefully) protest is wrong is something thsat is everyones right, just like others feeling there's nothing wrong they way that ( peaceful) protest is acceptable is a right all Americans should have.
Expecting everyone to agree with your POV on that protest is wrong , just like choosing a religion to hate is wrong.
Hating those who use religion to do terrorist acts shouldn't be considered a bad thing just like hurting the police protecting congress members, doing their job, should be considered a bad act by anti American scum

Everything matters if it's working against my country and our interests.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BossNJ

RUScrew85

Heisman
Nov 7, 2003
30,054
16,939
0
Wrong shooter. That was the Buffalo shooter. The police (and maybe the FBI?) interviewed him, he said he was kidding, and they let him go. There should be strict standards for people who own guns that if they express that they want to commit violence with guns, their guns should be taken away. This should not be a difficult concept, except for the NRA and the lawyers will be screaming about the Second and First Amendments.

While I understand your goal those two are pretty big toes to start stepping on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

T2Kplus20

Heisman
May 1, 2007
31,822
19,804
113
Wrong shooter. That was the Buffalo shooter. The police (and maybe the FBI?) interviewed him, he said he was kidding, and they let him go. There should be strict standards for people who own guns that if they express that they want to commit violence with guns, their guns should be taken away. This should not be a difficult concept, except for the NRA and the lawyers will be screaming about the Second and First Amendments.
Here is what I read before. He was arrested several years ago:

 

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
I don’t like a lot of things going on in this country either but I always stand for the anthem. I always respect those who put their lives on the line so guys like Mr Kotter can whine about our country. I don’t like the whiners but it’s his right to be a whiner if he wants. That’s why we owe so much to our veterans. We have the right to act like idiots and do whatever we want thanks to them. So I’ll stand for the Flag every time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knightmoves

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,841
16,113
0
How does restricting the rights of law abiding gun owners help a situation where some crazy person shoots innocents?
Maybe it’s part of a greater strategy that helps prevent these incidents but may temporarily inconvenience our law abiding gun owners. That works for me, does it work for you?
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,445
16,281
113
Everything matters if it's working against my country and our interests.
does the attack on the capital by those trying to stop congress from counting the electoral college ballots to validate the presidential election belong on your "working against my country and our interests." list.
That I found that ( violent ) action anti American and totally unacceptable.
Peaceful protests are protected by the US Constitution and have been part of the public's way to let government know how they feel on various issues that effect the USA.and our way of life along with our own moral values we hold dear.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,445
16,281
113
I don’t like a lot of things going on in this country either but I always stand for the anthem. I always respect those who put their lives on the line so guys like Mr Kotter can whine about our country. I don’t like the whiners but it’s his right to be a whiner if he wants. That’s why we owe so much to our veterans. We have the right to act like idiots and do whatever we want thanks to them. So I’ll stand for the Flag every time.
I'll also support Kapler's right to protest the way he feels right ( non violent) and also feel he's protesting the wrong way and actly distracting from the issue he's protesting about.

I have stood during the National Anthem since I could stand and will continue to do so until I can't stand on my own anymore

As for this thread, it's just about a repeat from the kneeling issue years ago that everyone had a say about and basically the same stance, by all, they have on this stay on locker-room issue

My POV is Kapler has a right to peacefully protest the way he feels is best, just like Colin K did.
I just feel they cxould have and sghould have found a better way because their choice of protest destracts from the goal by making the way their protesting the issue and not what they're protesting over
 
Status
Not open for further replies.