The incident you’re talking about makes a good case for gun ownership and I agree what she did proves guns can be used for a person's protection and for saving the lives of others.
That should never be denied to the type of people we might call a good person.
Hopefully people like that women always will be allowed to keep a weapon handy to use against bad actors.
It’s the bad actors and means to commit mass murder that gun laws need to address, not people like her.
Now on the other hand incidents like she was involved in don’t happen every time a threat is perceived and mistakes might just cost an innocent life if a perceived threat is handled wrong.
Those type of cases need to be part of the [picture, only to show mistakes that cost lives are made by gun owners as well.
There are incidents we hear of about people shooting family members coming in the house because the person already in the house wasn't expecting anyone and thought the person entering the house was a threat because they didn't know who it was entering the house , even though the person that wound up being shot lived there
Here's another case of shots being fired without really knowing the threat is real:
Teen shot, killed in "tragic accident" was mistaken for a dangerous animal, DA says
Tuesday, May 3rd 2022
>At this time, the two men were on a path above the embankment and reported hearing "what they perceived as a growl and stick breaking down the hill from where they were standing. Both also saw a dark figure and perceived the figure to be a threat."<
https://wlos.com/news/local/henders...eriffs-office-district-attorney-andrew-murray