Fundamental rights should not have qualifiers. There is no right to drive a car. Driving (in public) is a privilege granted by the state once you meet the state’s requirements. I agree with the sentiment, but who establishes what constitutes “training”? Pretty sure the training you mention and the training I received from my Dad would not satisfy the bureaucracy. Twenty-one states, including MS, do not require training nor permits to carry openly and/or concealed depending on the state, and yet negligent discharges (there really is no such thing as an accidental discharge) are thankfully rare. Baldwin is an idiot, and he will weasel out of this by going on parade with an anti-gun/anti-2nd Amendment message.
Fundamental rights shouldn't have qualifiers?
The right to vote has qualifiers- felons not voting, limits on when voting can take place, etc.
The right to free speech has qualifiers- libel, slander, placing others in danger, etc.
The right to bear arms has qualifiers- felons not carrying, limits as to what are kegal arms(nukes should be allowed?), etc.
Are you saying none of those qualifiers should exist? That's playing with fire.