I’ll go with the bloodyI would take Cone over Schilling any day
I’ll go with the bloodyI would take Cone over Schilling any day
disagree and the hof has already been diluted enough. 280 lifetime avg should never be considered unless hammering 600+ hrs. It's bad enough we got a guy with a 40yr career never hitting more than 40 a yr in simply because he leads the majors in hrs
hof is hof, no need to dilute
That 3K hits checks a lot of boxes for the writers.Being an East Coaster, I don’t follow the West Coast that much. But, looking at Kent’s stats, they look better then say Greg Biggio’s. Then again looking at the amount of votes Kent, and Helton got last year, I don’t think that many are going to vote for them this year. Schilling on the other hand, seems close to getting in.
Plus, Biggio was a good guy.That 3K hits checks a lot of boxes for the writers.
That 3K hits checks a lot of boxes for the writers.
I didn’t mean to say that Biggio wasn’t deserving of the HOF. Biggio was probably a bad comparison, but Kent did have a higher average, and more HR. Biggio is a class act, and gave one of the better speeches, when he was inducted into the HOF..That 3K hits checks a lot of boxes for the writers.
The other 66% are voting for the bloody sock.David Cone’s stats: 194-126 (60.6 win %) 3.46 ERA 1.256 WHIP years pitched 1986-2003
Curt Schilling stats: 216-146 (59.7 win %) 3.46 ERA 1.137 WHIP years pitched 1988-2007
Cone received HOF votes from 4% of voters, Schilling from 70%.
Looked at Schilling’s career again...he is certainly very close even if you just look at regular season. His playoff/WS does put him over the top.The same as 3K strikeouts like Schilling.
I didn’t think you were.I didn’t mean to say that Biggio wasn’t deserving of the HOF. Biggio was probably a bad comparison, but Kent did have a higher average, and more HR. Biggio is a class act, and gave one of the better speeches, when he was inducted into the HOF..
I never really watched Helton but I agree with your assessmentTodd Helton has a lifetime BA of .316.
In the past 50 years only the following players are higher.
Tony Gwynn (of course) - .338
Wade Boggs - .327
Rod Carew - .327
Kirby Puckett - .318
Vlad Guerrero - .317
Roberto Clemente - .317
Batting average is not a compiling stat. Matter of fact the longer you play the better chance your lifetime BA goes down. Mickey Mantle always said that one of his great regrets about hanging on those last few years was that his lifetime BA fell under .300 (.298).
Under rated player because he played in Colorado. Helton should be in.
like I said earlier in the thread, Kent is one of the GOAT infielders offensively. The guy consistently produced at All-Star level annually, competing for the batting title annually and I believe the most HRs ever for a career 2nd baseman (A-Rod spent the first half of his at SS)Kent vs. Biggio
Kent: .290 377 HR 1516 RBI
Biggio: .281 291 HR 1175 RBI
Gun to my head I would never had thought that Kent had a higher BA
most HRs ever for a career 2nd baseman
I understand the splits issue but you can't penalize the guy because of where he plays.I think Helton is somewhat deserving of induction, but there's a debate due to the altitude splits.
At home: .332, 134 homers. On the road: .285, 79 homers.
At least with Helton, he was the guy you didn't want to have beat you.
I don't think anyone went into a series with the Giants and said, yeah, we can't let Kent beat us.
As above posters stated, if you have to think about it.......
Waiting for that:
Helton - .316, 369 HR, 1406 RBI, 1401 Runs Scored, OBP .414 (17 years)
Mattingly - .307, 222 HR, 1099 RBI, 1007 Runs Scored, OBP .358 (14 years)
Gold Gloves - Mattingly 9, Helton 3
Silver Slugger - Mattingly 3, Helton 4
ASG - Mattingly 6, Helton 5
Top 10 MVP voting - Mattingly 4, Helton 3
Close but I give the slight nod to Helton. Health issues held back Donny but most people in the East don't realize how good Helton was.
I watched Mattingly and for a period of time he was in the top 10 players in the league. If I was picking a team I would take him over many HOF.
I would also be happy to have Keith Hernandez and Will Clark
Agree
Manny is a HOF
I am not sure any of them are HOF. I am sure they were better players than many who are.Point well taken and you named another two very good first baseman. Never thought of Clark as a HOFer though.
Hernandez you can debate.
Jorge Posada probably does. And Paulie O'NeillSo no one gets your vote?
Not even close.Jorge Posada probably does. And Paulie O'Neill
Or a number retired either. Or a plaque.not even in the ballpark...lol
Attitude, like Bell will not help him here.I will throw up if any player is named this year.
Maybe Jeff Kent was a very good hitter for his position. He played defense poorly at his position.
I know but you know how those Yankee shills are.Not even close.
The Knight Report
ESPN FPI projects Rutgers Football's 2026 schedule
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Fall Camp: Get 75% off The Knight Report - Final Day!
The Knight Report
College Football 27 Sim - Rutgers Football versus UMass Minutemen
The Knight Report
Rutgers vs. UMass on Polymarket: What the Odds Mean and How to Trade Them
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Top 10 Countdown: Tyler Needham