No departure today ?

VaBlueDevil33

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2009
3,549
1,308
0
I don't know if he looked lazy but he looked lost. And for psychosis statement that our defense sucked anyway- well then that even furthers why he wouldn't play. If he he can't play defense and out defense sucks why would we take out someone for a player that can't provide scoring either?

To clarify I said he looked lazy to me....sorry bout that​
 

IPSYCHOSIS

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2016
4,095
1,828
0
No he can't run like a guard I doubt anyone expects him too but what I saw and this is my opinion only....was a person that didn't give much effort in the games I saw him play....looked lazy to me
Have you seen him in person? I didn't see that. I thought he hustled the best of a mans ability at that size...now when we took quick shots by both teams and stuff sped up yea he can't catch up he might as well stand at mid court!! Lmao ..gotta play slow with him ..maybe he'll be in better shape next year
 

VaBlueDevil33

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2009
3,549
1,308
0
Have you seen him in person? I didn't see that. I thought he hustled the best of a mans ability at that size...now when we took quick shots by both teams and stuff sped up yea he can't catch up he might as well stand at mid court!! Lmao ..gotta play slow with him ..maybe he'll be in better shape next year

Yes I've seen him in person....but I fail to see what that matters
 

IPSYCHOSIS

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2016
4,095
1,828
0
I don't know if he looked lazy but he looked lost. And for psychosis statement that our defense sucked anyway- well then that even furthers why he wouldn't play. If he he can't play defense and out defense sucks why would we take out someone for a player that can't provide scoring either?
Why did Giles play then lol....he couldn't stay in front of my mom..yea he scored but in ways Jeter would score ..and easily could have been bolden ..he'll why play Jeter ..nvm... I'd play him because I saw flashes of his rebounding and ..yea he might get lost on d but I saw flashes of his just raw shot locking ability ...imo our d wouldn't have been worse ..no way or our O. how many times did we go to amile late in the year? We might as well just put our 2 best rebounders out there and let our guards shoot 3s haahah
 
Last edited:

IPSYCHOSIS

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2016
4,095
1,828
0
Seemed like we went to amile early and after that forgot about him ..wierd he had pretty good footwork ..and tbh amile looked lost at times and lazy..and arguing instead of getting back j/s I wasn't as high on him this year as some..great kid though..I think amile wore down ..hell the team did ...why our fast break was nonexistent !
 
Last edited:

timo0402

Heisman
Feb 24, 2009
13,868
13,709
57
Why did Giles play then lol....he couldn't stay in front of my mom..yea he scored but in ways Jeter would score ..and easily could have been bolden ..he'll why play Jeter ..nvm... I'd play him because I saw flashes of his rebounding and ..yea he might get lost on d but I saw flashes of his just raw shot locking ability ...imo our d wouldn't have been worse ..no way or our O. how many times did we go to amile late in the year? We might as well just put our 2 best rebounders out there and let our guards shoot 3s haahah
Our two best rebounders did play- Amile and Tatum. I'd ask you the same thing- would you play Harry over Bolden? Based on what you saw? I saw a guy who hustled his *** off and who got better as the year progressed. His energy was great all of the time. I thought he played well with Amile, and honestly I'd argue he could have played more than he did.

Your comment below about Amile is definitely true- he should have gotten a lot more touches throughout the game than he did.
 

IPSYCHOSIS

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2016
4,095
1,828
0
Our two best rebounders did play- Amile and Tatum. I'd ask you the same thing- would you play Harry over Bolden? Based on what you saw? I saw a guy who hustled his *** off and who got better as the year progressed. His energy was great all of the time. I thought he played well with Amile, and honestly I'd argue he could have played more than he did.

Your comment below about Amile is definitely true- he should have gotten a lot more touches throughout the game than he did.
Tatum was a hell of a rebounder!...I'd simply give bolden more PT is all I'm saying ..simple as I can put it..knowing what I know now about harry and how this turned out yes I would have gave a lot of his PT to bolden ...would I have done that at the beginning no probally not..harry Giles reaching his potential would always be in my mind..if he did omg..but bolden could have still gotten good minutes
 
Last edited:

IPSYCHOSIS

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2016
4,095
1,828
0
Jeter could argue well I'm better on d and offer no less on O why is harry playing in front of me...maybe why he transferred ..not saying i blame k at all .. I would have done the same j/s ..easier to say stuff now that we know the outcome ...harry did improve
 
Last edited:

hart2chesson

Heisman
Oct 13, 2012
14,303
16,574
0
I am stunned too. I didn't think we'd go undefeated but I thought we would be a shoein for ACC title, the #1 overall seed and unless a miracle took place a lock for arizona. This season didn't turn out like I thought at all. But it was one thing after another for a long period of time and it was always negative. This group battled uphill all year. But none of them gave up, they all came together, had a ridiculous run in the ACC tourney and only lost to what materialized to be a very tough team. I am proud of this group and what they accomplished even if they didn't live up to preseason expectations.

I am disappointed in a few specific areas. We didn't land a true point guard or at least one that remained on our roster this year. Seems like a miss by our staff. I am disappointed in the fact that we got very little out of our group of centers not named Amile. I don't know if that is coaching or player related but it was a disappointment. However I don't blame K because he didn't play enough players, everyone got their chance and no one made the most of their opportunity. Amile earned his time and played his *** off this year. Lastly I was disappointed in our defense. We had players that got beat bad on a nightly basis and even though we out scored a lot of teams we eventually ran into a tough defensive minded team that gave us fits and that same team played winning basketball when it mattered.

Nice post and I especially agree w/you about the defense. I sometimes wonder if it correlates to the one and done philosophy, and the studs are not fully invested into buying in. We also lost a pretty good little bulldog of an assistant and defensive ace in Wojo...

OFC
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192

timo0402

Heisman
Feb 24, 2009
13,868
13,709
57
Tatum was a hell of a rebounder!...I'd simply give bolden more PT is all I'm saying ..simple as I can put it..knowing what I know now about harry and how this turned out yes I would have gave a lot of his PT to bolden ...would I have done that at the beginning no probally not..harry Giles reaching his potential would always be in my mind..if he did omg..but bolden could have still gotten good minutes
You do realize that Harry averages only 11mpg right? So saying you'll give him his minutes doesn't really do a whole lot. Basically it's saying I prefer Bolden over Harry and if that's the case we disagree and that's fine. Either way only 7 men play in that scenario and I think your point is that more guys should have been part of the rotation and on that point I agree. I think I'd opt for Vrank over Bolden from what I saw this year.
 

ticket2ride04

Heisman
May 13, 2004
133,535
54,565
66
What's interesting about the one and done is the margin for error is so thin because you usually get one shot to win it before the core of your talent leaves. K has less time to spend coaching and developing guys over 2-3 years to become contributors.

Whereas Roy's dimished recruiting success has allowed him to help his guys get better and build a little bit.

I see why certain guys don't get burn at UK or Duke if they don't catch on quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOOGIEMAN1914

IPSYCHOSIS

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2016
4,095
1,828
0
You do realize that Harry averages only 11mpg right? So saying you'll give him his minutes doesn't really do a whole lot. Basically it's saying I prefer Bolden over Harry and if that's the case we disagree and that's fine. Either way only 7 men play in that scenario and I think your point is that more guys should have been part of the rotation and on that point I agree. I think I'd opt for Vrank over Bolden from what I saw this year.
At that point I did too! lol big frank flashes! I'm no coach I'm a potato ..don't pay no mind to me
 

IPSYCHOSIS

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2016
4,095
1,828
0
What's interesting about the one and done is the margin for error is so thin because you usually get one shot to win it before the core of your talent leaves. K has less time to spend coaching and developing guys over 2-3 years to become contributors.

Whereas Roy's dimished recruiting success has allowed him to help his guys get better and build a little bit.

I see why certain guys don't get burn at UK or Duke if they don't catch on quickly.
Exactly better be good and ready before U get here..my dream was always to go to Duke though so I see why some do it then realizes the want to play more ..hell I would sit the bench !
 

IPSYCHOSIS

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2016
4,095
1,828
0
inmeant I'd prefer bolden over Giles knowing how this ended ...but I also would have gave amile more rest and played bolden ..y is that an issue a lot feel that way..a lot predicted this from the. Beginning also that this would hurt us in march and it did.tbh a lot of what people were begging for happened ..just too late ..well other then bolden..injuries hurt us imo ! K kinda figured out our team a little to late..had we been healthy I think we beat SC too..just crap luck year nothing went right! Idk y we thought that would change in march..hopefully thornhill hits a 3 at the end to beat UNC!! Ahahah I'll die!!! Make it over maye in front of Roy ..after they mop up a premature confedi release from a berry shot with further review still 1 sec left boom!!!! Ahahah..then the. NCAA hammers a. Nail takes away 2 titles Knox commits to us ..we cut down the nets next year ..Roy retires..the end ..o we get Zion.....
 
Last edited:

dukehokie

All-American
Jun 27, 2005
19,624
6,220
113
Ok lol I'm just tired of leaving before the sweet 16 a top team doesn't only go past the 16 5 times In 17 years.. we've had great teams that didn't do well in the tourney but the level we get bounced early is sad. I just want a solution. I hope and pray next year we are the third team to in with one and dones nothing would make me happier but when things are clearly not what they should be it's ok to ask questions

I don't think this post is getting the discussion it deserves. I'd start simply by saying it's a matter of style of play, versus matchups given. Then if add, that in the same span of time, we've more national titles than anyone. So another question to ask is do we prefer national title or bust, or the consolation prize of getting to the Elite Eight or Final Four?
 

pisgah101

Heisman
Dec 26, 2005
15,647
13,544
113
I don't think this post is getting the discussion it deserves. I'd start simply by saying it's a matter of style of play, versus matchups given. Then if add, that in the same span of time, we've more national titles than anyone. So another question to ask is do we prefer national title or bust, or the consolation prize of getting to the Elite Eight or Final Four?

For the level of the program we are and how much talent we are suppose to have I think we should be in the elite eight every year at the minimum. I wouldn't trade a ship for anything but we underachiever too much I feel. But then you got poor Kansas that never gets anything and they have good talent too
 

bfort2223

Sophomore
Dec 4, 2009
200
111
0
I don't think this post is getting the discussion it deserves. I'd start simply by saying it's a matter of style of play, versus matchups given. Then if add, that in the same span of time, we've more national titles than anyone. So another question to ask is do we prefer national title or bust, or the consolation prize of getting to the Elite Eight or Final Four?
Can't we have it all?...jk

I think it's maybe a more serious question than you intended. Obviously, you never trade the titles but I'd also concede that we're legitimately title worthy (using the term loosely) less often than say KU or even UNC.

I don't say this to disparage the program but just to reiterate how blessed it is to root for a program able to achieve such excellence however intermittent or fleeting it may feel to the fans.

With that said I'd love another ACC regular season title some time soon but will cherish the tourney crown for now. It was a great flourish in an otherwise trying season.
 

pisgah101

Heisman
Dec 26, 2005
15,647
13,544
113
Can't we have it all?...jk

I think it's maybe a more serious question than you intended. Obviously, you never trade the titles but I'd also concede that we're legitimately title worthy (using the term loosely) less often than say KU or even UNC.

I don't say this to disparage the program but just to reiterate how blessed it is to root for a program able to achieve such excellence however intermittent or fleeting it may feel to the fans.

With that said I'd love another ACC regular season title some time soon but will cherish the tourney crown for now. It was a great flourish in an otherwise trying season.

Nah I'd rather have a trophy and a banner for winning the ACC then a fake title like Carolina has
 

dukiejay

Heisman
Mar 2, 2005
11,293
16,311
0
For the level of the program we are and how much talent we are suppose to have I think we should be in the elite eight every year at the minimum. I wouldn't trade a ship for anything but we underachiever too much I feel. But then you got poor Kansas that never gets anything and they have good talent too

We've struggled some in the NCAAT as a whole. None of us will argue. Even still, we've been more successful than any other program since the turn of the century. And Elite Eight minimum? That's pretty ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dukesince90
Nov 26, 2016
423
832
0
Can't we have it all?...jk

I think it's maybe a more serious question than you intended. Obviously, you never trade the titles but I'd also concede that we're legitimately title worthy (using the term loosely) less often than say KU or even UNC.

I don't say this to disparage the program but just to reiterate how blessed it is to root for a program able to achieve such excellence however intermittent or fleeting it may feel to the fans.

With that said I'd love another ACC regular season title some time soon but will cherish the tourney crown for now. It was a great flourish in an otherwise trying season.
Regular season title? You sound like a Heel fan. Duke is the ACC Champion. Not regular season or tournament but THE ACC CHAMPION, the only one this year.

And we ran into a bad match up during the tournament. South Carolina beat us but I think if we switch UNC and Duke bracket, UNC loses 2nd round and we're in the elite 8 guaranteed. Maybe we make it further, maybe we don't but I wouldn't switch places with any other school.
 

IPSYCHOSIS

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2016
4,095
1,828
0
I could care less about the regular season title ..it's short lived..name the last 5 ..without thinking to hard..lol ..the tourneys all I care about that and beating Carolina ..2/3 pretty good ...everybody knows now that it's not all about playing good teams every night beating the chit out of each other and having the advantage in march ...you can get wore down ..just like pretty much the whole acc did ...imo ..that and the style of play changed drastically not in our favor..I agree with who said if us and UNC switch they lose in round 2 and we're at least playing Kentucky ....which should have been what happen !!!!' We got hosed and our bad luck continued having to play a final four team at home in round 2...while getting hosed by the refs while Carolina has a cupcake schedule .and should have lost in round 2..like they had all year lol na but yea...easier then ours ..we should have won though we got outplayed ..but we have a bunch this year and still won .
 
Last edited:

IPSYCHOSIS

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2016
4,095
1,828
0
They really set UNC up pretty good this year on that side imo ...biggest challenge was a team that took a player 47 points to beat them without pinson ...then play injured Oregon ....lmao na I'm just being a sorry loser having little fun but foreal ! Everybody hates us...makes it that much sweeter when we win though that a positive
 
Last edited:

pisgah101

Heisman
Dec 26, 2005
15,647
13,544
113
We've struggled some in the NCAAT as a whole. None of us will argue. Even still, we've been more successful than any other program since the turn of the century. And Elite Eight minimum? That's pretty ridiculous.

Ridiculous with a top class every single year? I don't think so. If UK doesn't make the final four ever year they're pissed and we're supposedly recruiting the same or better than them.
 

sheyduke

All-American
Apr 13, 2010
14,115
9,648
108
sheyduke:
How did Mason Plumlee play and look when Kyrie Irving played those games at Duke vs when Irving went down? I believe his points went down because of not having that PG who by the was a scoring PG in my view
Did I say anything about points? I said defensive struggles. I'm aware of how Mason played in the eleven games leading up to toe-gate. Duke lost most their games because they couldn't stop my grandma five feet from the basket.
 

chov1125

All-Conference
Oct 15, 2008
3,046
1,826
73
These aren't best of 5 or 7 game series, it's one and done. Winning a national championship is very very tough to accomplish. You have to match up well against so many good teams and so many styles of play. Kentucky has suffered some early losses and they have gone to the NIT during Cal's run. And they have only cut down the final net once, just once. Is one or two more tournament wins on average more important than sacrificing all the regular season success and national championships, to me it's a hell no. Again if there were other teams out there having more success than us year in and year out you may get me to bite, but it's simply not the case.

I get it, it's tough watching back to back Carolina runs, but they didn't win it last year and there is no guarantee they win it this year. And no matter how much BS we get from clowns down the street we still consistently whoop their *** head to head and it's killing them inside. Let's rally around the ducks or whoever makes it to the finals, knock these scrubs out and watch them come to the realization that they get nothing
 

timo0402

Heisman
Feb 24, 2009
13,868
13,709
57
Ridiculous with a top class every single year? I don't think so. If UK doesn't make the final four ever year they're pissed and we're supposedly recruiting the same or better than them.
This is an extremely black and white take which it often is not. I agree that I wish we had some more success rather than the early round exits we have had. On the flip side, if we don't make the final four, what difference does it make. I don't sleep better knowing we went to the sweet 16 with that group last year. I don't sleep worse knowing the Austin rivers or Jabari teams lose in the first round. I definitely think about had 2013 team that got a ****** draw against Louisville when I felt like Duke and they were the two best teams in the country and yet somehow slated in the same bracket. I think about 98 when we blew a huge lead against UK in wojos senior year. To me, if you get to the final four that's the accomplishment. So much depends on matchups- it does. UNC has a cake walk to the elite 8 before they play a worthy opponent. Congrats to them for beating that opponent to make it to the final four which is always an accomplishment no matter who your opponent is. If I'm UK though, I don't look at them and say you had a better year because you got to the elite 8. we both won our leagues we both didn't make the final four. Is what it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bfort2223

LetsGoDukies

Senior
Jul 10, 2013
942
787
0
Ridiculous with a top class every single year? I don't think so. If UK doesn't make the final four ever year they're pissed and we're supposedly recruiting the same or better than them.
Well I'm with you pisgah. Sure I'm ecstatic about our national championships but I'm equally disgusted with our flame outs that occur way too often.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pisgah101

thinkpositivePC

Redshirt
Aug 7, 2007
1,825
4
0
I'm under the same impression... Losing in the final four or the first weekend is the exact same thing, you lost. We hang banners for championships, not participating in certain rounds. I love how everyone is mentioning Kentucky and not Kansas. 14 out of the last 15 years they have been big 12 champions... 1 NCAA championship in the last 15 years. I would not trade Dukes tournament success for anything.

Since 2000 we've been to 3 National Championships, we won 3. Our friends down the road have to 3 National championships since 2000, lost 1. Very likely they go back this year, if they lose then good.

Personally, the 2013-2014 season was the biggest let down. I still cant understand how a 1 2 punch of Hood and Parker get stopped. Probably because our next "big" man averaged 6.5 points a game (Amile). That roster was perfect for a deep run.
 

Laettner

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2002
6,249
1,390
0
Settle down guys, everything will work out. We won a national championship 24 months ago! If Heels lose Sat or Mon their season will be a disappointment as well.

Kentucky blew an undefeated season in '15 & suffered another E8 buzzer beater. It could be worse.
 

timo0402

Heisman
Feb 24, 2009
13,868
13,709
57
Well I'm with you pisgah. Sure I'm ecstatic about our national championships but I'm equally disgusted with our flame outs that occur way too often.
You can't be serious that you're and I'm taking you at your word here are equally ecstatic and disgusted on both. It is so incredibly hard to win it all. That should trump any other feeling even if we flame out of the tourney five straight years
 

timo0402

Heisman
Feb 24, 2009
13,868
13,709
57
Personally, the 2013-2014 season was the biggest let down. I still cant understand how a 1 2 punch of Hood and Parker get stopped. Probably because our next "big" man averaged 6.5 points a game (Amile). That roster was perfect for a deep run.[/QUOTE]
That team couldn't get a stop to save their life unfortunately. Really liked that team to be honest but the lack of a big man inside ended up killing us.
 

LetsGoDukies

Senior
Jul 10, 2013
942
787
0
You can't be serious that you're and I'm taking you at your word here are equally ecstatic and disgusted on both. It is so incredibly hard to win it all. That should trump any other feeling even if we flame out of the tourney five straight years
Maybe not equally but very close. With the talent we have had and the best coach in he business, we shouldn't be getting bumped in the first weekend consistently. I know it's very difficult to win it all but we should make it past the first weekend way more than we have recently.
 

dukedevilz

Heisman
Apr 3, 2002
15,637
19,600
0
I take some solace knowing that 1). We won the freaking ACC Tournament with 4 quality wins in 4 days. And 2). We lost essentially a road game in the NCAA's to a Final Four team. How many teams would have defeated SC in Columbia where 90% of the crowd was vehemently rooting against them? Not many.
 

dukephysics

All-Conference
Jul 27, 2016
1,109
1,365
0
I take some solace knowing that 1). We won the freaking ACC Tournament with 4 quality wins in 4 days. And 2). We lost essentially a road game in the NCAA's to a Final Four team. How many teams would have defeated SC in Columbia where 90% of the crowd was vehemently rooting against them? Not many.
And beat UNC twice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukedevilz