Ok. Let’s tag them this way then…..they are Americans and in America we have the right to earn a living. We should all have the right to profit off of our own name and likeness and not be denied that by any organization that does in fact profit off of said likeness. Do you not agree?College athletes are NOT workers/employees. They’re students, though that has been made a mockery as well.
A company paying a celebrity for their name, image or likeness is basic and pure capitalism. Please explain how it is notSure thing Scooter.
So the top dogs will continue to get the stars?This development in college sports will benefit the top dogs, but will end up destroying competition. If that’s what you want, then great. It’s not what I want. I don't. I don’t want a handful of schools to get an even greater advantage than they already have and that’s where it’s going to end up. They might as well reduce the NCAAT to 16 teams in a few years, because that’s all that’s going to matter.
That and even more.So the top dogs will continue to get the stars?
I love your passion. I really do. And I love a debate as much as the next guy. But the train is on the tracks and it's chugging along hard. Why not get on board as this point? It's a moot point. It is happening. I respect your right to voice your displeasure, though. (And I am being serious)Let me explain so even an idiot can understand. Scholarships are compensation, but they’re not taxable as such. Take that up with the U.S. tax code. It’s Title 26 in the U.S. Code if you’re interested. Being paid as an “ employee”, as has been argued on here, does represent taxable compensation. It’s the law. It’s the way it is. You cannot be classified as an employee and not pay taxes on the compensation. Period.
What more could they want that they don’t already get?That and even more.
Once they go pro or are no longer on scholarship, absolutely. Not while they’re in school. No!Ok. Let’s tag them this way then…..they are Americans and in America we have the right to earn a living. We should all have the right to profit off of our own name and likeness and not be denied that by any organization that does in fact profit off of said likeness. Do you not agree?
How the hell can you say they’re not employees when you talk about their compensation? Because it’s school it’s different? Makes no sense. At all.I’m a staunch Conservative and fully support capitalism. College athletes are NOT employees. They’re scholarship STUDENTS (laughable as that term might be in this context). And they’re compensated through their scholarship. Based on your argument, I fully expect every scholarship athlete to pay federal, state, and local taxes on the full value of their scholarship from this point forward. If they want to be treated as employees, it should be all the way.
So what about other kids who don’t play sports but are on scholarship?Once they go pro or are no longer on scholarship, absolutely. Not while they’re in school. No!
Student = attack the free marketOnce they go pro or are no longer on scholarship, absolutely. Not while they’re in school. No!
Dude do you want to hold on to your nostalgia or do you want to live in free America? I hear Russia is beautiful this time of year.
It’s ball, nothing more. Stop making it more than it is. Go Cats.
Why don’t you show up for your workplace every day out of the goodness of your heart?A sad day. Now our players represent their sponsors, not UK.
The age of semipro college sports has begun. College basketball played as amateur competition had ended.
Not for the same reason I trained as an athlete?Why don’t you show up for your workplace every day out of the goodness of your heart?
If the player is worth it, we will match any offer one way or the otherWith the transfer rule will this open up some bidding wars for star players? If a Lexington car dealer is paying 100K to a player and car dealer in LA wants him at UCLA maybe he will offer double to get him to transfer and represent his dealer at UCLA. Could be some interesting stuff going on in the future. Since the deals are not tied to the university it should be wide open unless a contract is in place with the player to begin with, then a buyout clause may come into play.
Why not?Once they go pro or are no longer on scholarship, absolutely. Not while they’re in school. No!
Perhaps communist Russia is not communist Russia anymore? Hmmm. I need another communist country for my analogy STAT!Lol, i think my favorite logic pretzel with this entire issue is the Russia / communist comments.
I can definitely tell political science is not the strong suit.
If I wanted to seek control would I really ask?So I take it you want to control my TV viewing too?
Oh no. They have viable options. You seem to want to destroy amateur athletics.If I wanted to seek control would I really ask?
You seem to be the one here wanting to control others abilities to earn a living.
Amateur athletics still exist everywhere. What world are you living in? Go root for EKU or Bellarmine if it means that much to you. Go to the local Ymca. Go find your happinessOh no. They have viable options. You seem to want to destroy amateur athletics.
I’ll get to laugh later. When everyone realizes they just stepped knee deep in a stinking, steaming pile of crap.
By the way, I guess you support drug dealing as capitalism. They are just making money, right?
So you don’t give a damn about athletics as long as you think we get an advantage.Amateur athletics still exist everywhere. What world are you living in? Go root for EKU or Bellarmine if it means that much to you. Go to the local Ymca. Go find your happiness
I'll ask once again since you ignored it the first time. What are the other viable options for football players?Oh no. They have viable options. You seem to want to destroy amateur athletics.
I’ll get to laugh later. When everyone realizes they just stepped knee deep in a stinking, steaming pile of crap.
By the way, I guess you support drug dealing as capitalism. They are just making money, right?
Apparently they aren’t needed. Otherwise there would be more options. Free enterprise, remember? That’s how capitalism works.I'll ask once again since you ignored it the first time. What are the other viable options for football players?
Dude you just said that dealing drugs is akin to signing autographs. You’ve proven over and over that you have no idea how capitalism works.Apparently they aren’t needed. Otherwise there would be more options. Free enterprise, remember? That’s how capitalism works.
But you said there were other options.Apparently they aren’t needed. Otherwise there would be more options. Free enterprise, remember? That’s how capitalism works.
One of the biggest reasons why I support NIL is because though the scholarship is assigned monetary value relative to however much the cost to attend the school is, it isn’t like they can be given a scholarship that is worth $100K and sell it to someone else to cash out if they wanted to.A lot of you also bring up the fact that the student athletes are already being paid via a free education. I actually agree with that. They are getting something that has a monetary value in exchange for their participation in their sport. So In Essence they have always been paid.
I am in favor of that and I am also in favor of them getting even more payment in exchange for their name, image and likeness. If a person can make money in a free and open market then I think that’s beautiful. That’s the American dream. I love this freakin country.
I like my liberty without restraints
They can make a living. Nothing was stopping them. They voluntarily agreed to enter amateur athletic competition. They have every right every other American had. So your basic assumption is just more ********.Ok. Let’s tag them this way then…..they are Americans and in America we have the right to earn a living. We should all have the right to profit off of our own name and likeness and not be denied that by any organization that does in fact profit off of said likeness. Do you not agree?
The academic studen did not voluntarily enter into an agreement to compete as an amateur. Nobody forced these athletes.One of the biggest reasons why I support NIL is because though the scholarship is assigned monetary value relative to however much the cost to attend the school is, it isn’t like they can be given a scholarship that is worth $100K and sell it to someone else to cash out if they wanted to.
It never made sense as to why a student who was on a full academic scholarship could have access to outside sources of revenue like NIL is providing but a student on an athletic scholarship could not without forfeiting their eligibility. This is a step in the right direction.
A sad day. Now our players represent their sponsors, not UK.
The age of semipro college sports has begun. College basketball played as amateur competition had ended.
I mean it’s not like they’re in a position to choose. Most families can’t afford college out of pocket, so while it’s true that nobody forced them to accept the scholarship, it’s not like they have many other options if they want to attend college and try to avoid crippling debt to pay back.The academic studen did not voluntarily enter into an agreement to compete as an amateur. Nobody forced these athletes.
The game was MUCH better in the 70’s-90’s. I guess that’s “old school ignorance”?Student = attack the free market
Athlete = attack the free market
Student-athlete = forbidden from the free market
That is the epitome of old school ignorance