NIL day one

Rockfly78

Heisman
Nov 20, 2014
7,927
10,877
0
College athletes are NOT workers/employees. They’re students, though that has been made a mockery as well.
Ok. Let’s tag them this way then…..they are Americans and in America we have the right to earn a living. We should all have the right to profit off of our own name and likeness and not be denied that by any organization that does in fact profit off of said likeness. Do you not agree?
 
  • Like
Reactions: fla.cat

KYWildCatsFan

Heisman
Aug 18, 2017
6,497
13,881
98
This development in college sports will benefit the top dogs, but will end up destroying competition. If that’s what you want, then great. It’s not what I want. I don't. I don’t want a handful of schools to get an even greater advantage than they already have and that’s where it’s going to end up. They might as well reduce the NCAAT to 16 teams in a few years, because that’s all that’s going to matter.
So the top dogs will continue to get the stars?
 

MWes11

Heisman
Apr 22, 2012
12,025
10,106
0
Let me explain so even an idiot can understand. Scholarships are compensation, but they’re not taxable as such. Take that up with the U.S. tax code. It’s Title 26 in the U.S. Code if you’re interested. Being paid as an “ employee”, as has been argued on here, does represent taxable compensation. It’s the law. It’s the way it is. You cannot be classified as an employee and not pay taxes on the compensation. Period.
I love your passion. I really do. And I love a debate as much as the next guy. But the train is on the tracks and it's chugging along hard. Why not get on board as this point? It's a moot point. It is happening. I respect your right to voice your displeasure, though. (And I am being serious)
 
  • Like
Reactions: BourbonBalz

BourbonBalz

All-American
Mar 5, 2005
11,430
9,235
0
Ok. Let’s tag them this way then…..they are Americans and in America we have the right to earn a living. We should all have the right to profit off of our own name and likeness and not be denied that by any organization that does in fact profit off of said likeness. Do you not agree?
Once they go pro or are no longer on scholarship, absolutely. Not while they’re in school. No!
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFuqua

chroix

Heisman
Jul 22, 2013
10,511
26,567
113
I’m a staunch Conservative and fully support capitalism. College athletes are NOT employees. They’re scholarship STUDENTS (laughable as that term might be in this context). And they’re compensated through their scholarship. Based on your argument, I fully expect every scholarship athlete to pay federal, state, and local taxes on the full value of their scholarship from this point forward. If they want to be treated as employees, it should be all the way.
How the hell can you say they’re not employees when you talk about their compensation? Because it’s school it’s different? Makes no sense. At all.
 

Rockfly78

Heisman
Nov 20, 2014
7,927
10,877
0
A lot of you also bring up the fact that the student athletes are already being paid via a free education. I actually agree with that. They are getting something that has a monetary value in exchange for their participation in their sport. So In Essence they have always been paid.

I am in favor of that and I am also in favor of them getting even more payment in exchange for their name, image and likeness. If a person can make money in a free and open market then I think that’s beautiful. That’s the American dream. I love this freakin country.

I like my liberty without restraints
 

Gromcat_rivals

Heisman
Jun 28, 2021
10,292
27,496
0
Dude do you want to hold on to your nostalgia or do you want to live in free America? I hear Russia is beautiful this time of year.

It’s ball, nothing more. Stop making it more than it is. Go Cats.

Lol, i think my favorite logic pretzel with this entire issue is the Russia / communist comments.
I can definitely tell political science is not the strong suit.
 

ryanbruner

Heisman
Sep 10, 2017
13,687
21,953
113
Free market baby! Nothing gets me more excited than bag dropping. Time to get the ball rolling. I expect Jalen Duren to have 6 local endorsements by tomorrow. All under the table. All very sketchy. Pay the man!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerMoving

65pacecar

All-Conference
Nov 16, 2014
1,562
2,009
81
With the transfer rule will this open up some bidding wars for star players? If a Lexington car dealer is paying 100K to a player and car dealer in LA wants him at UCLA maybe he will offer double to get him to transfer and represent his dealer at UCLA. Could be some interesting stuff going on in the future. Since the deals are not tied to the university it should be wide open unless a contract is in place with the player to begin with, then a buyout clause may come into play.
 

know1

Heisman
Dec 8, 2002
12,855
14,925
0
I don't necessarily mind that they are able to make money and I think they ultimately should, but at the same time, it's going to diminish my fanhood of college basketball just a little bit more. And it's already eroded a lot in the last several years.
 

TigerMoving

Heisman
Jul 13, 2014
7,914
21,908
113
With the transfer rule will this open up some bidding wars for star players? If a Lexington car dealer is paying 100K to a player and car dealer in LA wants him at UCLA maybe he will offer double to get him to transfer and represent his dealer at UCLA. Could be some interesting stuff going on in the future. Since the deals are not tied to the university it should be wide open unless a contract is in place with the player to begin with, then a buyout clause may come into play.
If the player is worth it, we will match any offer one way or the other
 

Rockfly78

Heisman
Nov 20, 2014
7,927
10,877
0
Lol, i think my favorite logic pretzel with this entire issue is the Russia / communist comments.
I can definitely tell political science is not the strong suit.
Perhaps communist Russia is not communist Russia anymore? Hmmm. I need another communist country for my analogy STAT!
 
Jul 9, 2004
93,075
38,060
0
The beauty of all of this is that if you don't want to contribute to the NIL you don't have to. Just simply not participate. What a novel idea.
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
If I wanted to seek control would I really ask?
You seem to be the one here wanting to control others abilities to earn a living.
Oh no. They have viable options. You seem to want to destroy amateur athletics.

I’ll get to laugh later. When everyone realizes they just stepped knee deep in a stinking, steaming pile of crap.

By the way, I guess you support drug dealing as capitalism. They are just making money, right?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ramsey_Bolton

TigerMoving

Heisman
Jul 13, 2014
7,914
21,908
113
Oh no. They have viable options. You seem to want to destroy amateur athletics.

I’ll get to laugh later. When everyone realizes they just stepped knee deep in a stinking, steaming pile of crap.

By the way, I guess you support drug dealing as capitalism. They are just making money, right?
Amateur athletics still exist everywhere. What world are you living in? Go root for EKU or Bellarmine if it means that much to you. Go to the local Ymca. Go find your happiness
 

420grover

All-American
Mar 26, 2006
7,703
7,860
0
Oh no. They have viable options. You seem to want to destroy amateur athletics.

I’ll get to laugh later. When everyone realizes they just stepped knee deep in a stinking, steaming pile of crap.

By the way, I guess you support drug dealing as capitalism. They are just making money, right?
I'll ask once again since you ignored it the first time. What are the other viable options for football players?
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
I'll ask once again since you ignored it the first time. What are the other viable options for football players?
Apparently they aren’t needed. Otherwise there would be more options. Free enterprise, remember? That’s how capitalism works.
 

germuk

Heisman
May 14, 2009
6,544
10,392
113
A lot of you also bring up the fact that the student athletes are already being paid via a free education. I actually agree with that. They are getting something that has a monetary value in exchange for their participation in their sport. So In Essence they have always been paid.

I am in favor of that and I am also in favor of them getting even more payment in exchange for their name, image and likeness. If a person can make money in a free and open market then I think that’s beautiful. That’s the American dream. I love this freakin country.

I like my liberty without restraints
One of the biggest reasons why I support NIL is because though the scholarship is assigned monetary value relative to however much the cost to attend the school is, it isn’t like they can be given a scholarship that is worth $100K and sell it to someone else to cash out if they wanted to.
It never made sense as to why a student who was on a full academic scholarship could have access to outside sources of revenue like NIL is providing but a student on an athletic scholarship could not without forfeiting their eligibility. This is a step in the right direction.
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
Ok. Let’s tag them this way then…..they are Americans and in America we have the right to earn a living. We should all have the right to profit off of our own name and likeness and not be denied that by any organization that does in fact profit off of said likeness. Do you not agree?
They can make a living. Nothing was stopping them. They voluntarily agreed to enter amateur athletic competition. They have every right every other American had. So your basic assumption is just more ********.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BourbonBalz

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
One of the biggest reasons why I support NIL is because though the scholarship is assigned monetary value relative to however much the cost to attend the school is, it isn’t like they can be given a scholarship that is worth $100K and sell it to someone else to cash out if they wanted to.
It never made sense as to why a student who was on a full academic scholarship could have access to outside sources of revenue like NIL is providing but a student on an athletic scholarship could not without forfeiting their eligibility. This is a step in the right direction.
The academic studen did not voluntarily enter into an agreement to compete as an amateur. Nobody forced these athletes.
 

Eccain01

All-Conference
Dec 20, 2020
1,511
1,976
0
There is no reason a person shouldn’t be able to make money off their own image especially when others make money off that. I don’t understand why other people getting money bothers some of you.
 

MegaBlue05

Heisman
Mar 8, 2014
10,811
21,283
66
A sad day. Now our players represent their sponsors, not UK.

The age of semipro college sports has begun. College basketball played as amateur competition had ended.

College basketball played as amateur competition has been a ruse since at least the early 90s. Damn near every highly ranked recruit likely received some sort of illegal extra benefit as early as 8th or 9th grade and continuing through high school and AAU.

Amateurism has been a facade for a long time now in both major revenue generating NCAA sports.
 

germuk

Heisman
May 14, 2009
6,544
10,392
113
The academic studen did not voluntarily enter into an agreement to compete as an amateur. Nobody forced these athletes.
I mean it’s not like they’re in a position to choose. Most families can’t afford college out of pocket, so while it’s true that nobody forced them to accept the scholarship, it’s not like they have many other options if they want to attend college and try to avoid crippling debt to pay back.

And most academic scholarships to have terms that you must uphold to maintain the scholarship, usually a GPA requirement.

The only body that has even cared about amatuerism is the NCAA.