What I posted regarding the Hungarian election appears to be true or this wouldn’t be happening.
Again, you have zero defense and zero solutions. You are correct, you are more than a complete waste of my time.You try to get my attention on a daily basis.
Population growth and water, electricity usage; Specifically Arizona.
In 1995, the University of Arizona started a study of how to lower grid electricity usage by structures, both large buildings AND single family housing, to allow for future growth !
The number 1 use of electricity was use of air conditioning. The answer wasn't more/better, more efficient A/C units !
It was air towers that moved normal air throughout the home using chimney-like size attached structures that allow air into and out the building. WITHOUT any power use required it would lower temps inside the structure to 75 F with outside temps at 115 F.
Populations saved.
See above about water.
Syracuse Univ education in Phys Ed.
Again, you have zero defense and zero solutions. You are correct, you are more than a complete waste of my time.
Some people in this thread don’t care if this nutbag regime gets nukes. These extremists are the scum of the earth.
Maybe if you’d stop golfing this world would be a better place.I offered the solution of giving incentives to people/companies to move to areas with more water and you accused me of supporting communism.
Um…you didn’t offer incentives in your initial post. You posted that later.I offered the solution of giving incentives to people/companies to move to areas with more water and you accused me of supporting communism.
How about using your incentives to move growing of alfalfa to wetter regions and leave the water for the people. Alfalfa crops use 4-5 million acre feet (mostly from the Colorado river) each year. It is a water intensive crop in a dry region. The capitalist solution would be to raise water rates to balance supply and demand which would eliminate some of the marginal farming and ranching uses. Instead they keep the rates low and let the govt allocate "cheap" water based on water rights given to whomever started using it first, which includes an enormous amount for agriculture in the Imperial Valley in CA that has an average rainfall of 5 inches.I offered the solution of giving incentives to people/companies to move to areas with more water and you accused me of supporting communism.
How about using your incentives to move growing of alfalfa to wetter regions and leave the water for the people. Alfalfa crops use 4-5 million acre feet (mostly from the Colorado river) each year. It is a water intensive crop in a dry region. The capitalist solution would be to raise water rates to balance supply and demand which would eliminate some of the marginal farming and ranching uses. Instead they keep the rates low and let the govt allocate "cheap" water based on water rights given to whomever started using it first, which includes an enormous amount for agriculture in the Imperial Valley in CA that has an average rainfall of 5 inches.
Lake Mead is getting low so cuts, probably heavily aimed at AZ, are coming but the decision criteria are the path of least resistance because no one except someone like Musk would be impartial and forward looking enough to declare the best use, so alfalfa it is.