Mueller is a complete Buffoon.....

[atlkvb]

His work was not very thorough.

Or very honest. He couldn't remember why he didn't even investigate who hacked Hillary's server and his job was to investigate Russian "interference" in our election. Then he couldn't remember items in his own report. He's either senile, incompetent, or an accomplished liar.

 

[mule_eer]

Probably explains whey they cooperated fully.

I guess you missed the part about the investigation being impeded by some folks related to the campaign telling partial truths or outright lies. You also missed the part about the written answers provided to the SC by Trump.

 

[mule_eer]

Lighten up Francis. He calls me worse all the time. We will both live.

Really? Example?

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[atlkvb]

Really? Example?

He refers to all of us on the Right as a "circle jerk". Very tolerant phraseology.

 

[wvu2007]

I guess you missed the part about the investigation being impeded by some folks related to the campaign telling partial truths or outright lies. You also missed the part about the written answers provided to the SC by Trump.

 

[atlkvb]

Jordan didnt ask him questions he couldnt answer. That is pure ********. He asked him questions he should have answered in the report and didnt. He asked him why he didnt do his job. He made Mueller look foolish and he didnt do a disservice to anyone.

Here...here!!!!!:clap:

 

[atlkvb]

Very, very funny! kay:

Does this mean now Peter we're going to jail?

I told you to shut up you ignorant slut!

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[mule_eer]

He refers to all of us on the Right as a "circle jerk". Very tolerant phraseology.

I think it was pretty clear that he was speaking about the way the posting was going from that side: looking for the gotcha questions, disregarding the negatives, trying to attribute questions that Mueller said he couldn't answer to a lack of knowledge about the facts.

I don't characterize this as a win for either side. Mueller's testimony was pretty much what anyone who read the report knew already. I was able to listen to part of it live. I had negative things to say about the questions from both sides of the aisle. I do think that Mueller did exactly what he said he would. Any complaint from either side of the aisle about that is just proof that we aren't used to people in these positions being honorable and true to their word.

 

[wvu2007]

I think it was pretty clear that he was speaking about the way the posting was going from that side: looking for the gotcha questions, disregarding the negatives, trying to attribute questions that Mueller said he couldn't answer to a lack of knowledge about the facts.

I don't characterize this as a win for either side. Mueller's testimony was pretty much what anyone who read the report knew already. I was able to listen to part of it live. I had negative things to say about the questions from both sides of the aisle. I do think that Mueller did exactly what he said he would. Any complaint from either side of the aisle about that is just proof that we aren't used to people in these positions being honorable and true to their word.

Let me mansplain also. I think Dave called him a **** because he was joking but you got butthurt about it. I bet boomboom isn't even mad.

 

[atlkvb]

How does he not know who Fusion GPS was? Wasn't he investigating Russian interference? They didn't interfere with that dossier bought and paid for from the Russians?

He wasted 40 million dollars. I want a refund!

 

[mule_eer]

Let me mansplain also. I think Dave called him a **** because he was joking but you got butthurt about it. I bet boomboom isn't even mad.

I'm not hurt about any of this. I was simply pointing things out as I saw them. Also, Dave tried to defend it, not brush it off as a joke, in his response to me.

 

[atlkvb]

I think it was pretty clear that he was speaking about the way the posting was going from that side: looking for the gotcha questions, disregarding the negatives, trying to attribute questions that Mueller said he couldn't answer to a lack of knowledge about the facts.

I don't characterize this as a win for either side. Mueller's testimony was pretty much what anyone who read the report knew already. I was able to listen to part of it live. I had negative things to say about the questions from both sides of the aisle. I do think that Mueller did exactly what he said he would. Any complaint from either side of the aisle about that is just proof that we aren't used to people in these positions being honorable and true to their word.

I just respectfully disagree. He was called by the Democrats to "explain" his findings. He couldn't remember half of what he wrote, and refused to answer questions about the other half! He was disaster. He knew none of it was ever true, it was all a lie, all a conspiracy and he knew he had nothing else to offer or answer to. He knew it was all bogus, his investigation was bogus, he's bogus and so is the Democrat party.

 

[mule_eer]

I just respectfully disagree. He was called by the Democrats to "explain" his findings. He couldn't remember half of what he wrote, and refused to answer questions about the other half! He was disaster. He knew none of it was ever true, it was all a lie, all a conspiracy and he knew he had nothing else to offer or answer to. He knew it was all bogus, his investigation was bogus, he's bogus and so is the Democrat party.

He told everyone that the report was his testimony. He stood by that. As for the rest of your rant, that's all opinion from a person who, as I believe you have admitted, has not read any of the report.

 

[atlkvb]

He told everyone that the report was his testimony. He stood by that. As for the rest of your rant, that's all opinion from a person who, as I believe you have admitted, has not read any of the report.

Know what mule....it doesn't matter. The Truth about all of this will eventually come out, and we now know Mueller's report is not the Truth of what really happened here. I'll wait for the Truth, then make my final judgement on what this really was all about? For now I'm good with "no collusion" "no obstruction" because Mueller sure didn't say anything different today or offer proof of anything else.

And yes I did read the report. It's a giant scam because it doesn't say one word about Hillary or the Dem's "collusion" with Russians.

 

[tjebarr]

I guess you missed the part about the investigation being impeded by some folks related to the campaign telling partial truths or outright lies. You also missed the part about the written answers provided to the SC by Trump.

He has orange glasses

 

[atlkvb]

He has orange glasses

And you're blind. Why didn't you answer my question about the investigation done on Omar? What's wrong, too many facts? Too many named "sources"?

Go somewhere man talking about folks who see only what they want to see.
@tjebarr ...my Man!

 

[wvu2007]

He has orange glasses

That's gay doe.

 

[mule_eer]

Know what mule....it doesn't matter. The Truth about all of this will eventually come out, and we now know Mueller's report is not the Truth of what really happened here. I'll wait for the Truth, then make my final judgement on what this really was all about? For now I'm good with "no collusion" "no obstruction" because Mueller sure didn't say anything different today or offer proof of anything else.

And yes I did read the report. It's a giant scam because it doesn't say one word about Hillary and the Dem's "collusion" with Russians.

The SC was set up to investigate the claim of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians to impact the election with the ability to investigate potential crimes discovered during the course of that investigation. That's what Mueller did. I heard lots of complaints from the right about how Mueller was straying from his mandate prior to the report. Now the report is out, and you are complaining that he didn't stray far enough from that mandate. Here's the main issue. It doesn't take a SC to investigate a private citizen. DOJ is free to investigate, charge, etc, HRC on any potential crimes she may have committed, whether during the campaign or prior to it.

 

[atlkvb]

The SC was set up to investigate the claim of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians to impact the election with the ability to investigate potential crimes discovered during the course of that investigation. That's what Mueller did. I heard lots of complaints from the right about how Mueller was straying from his mandate prior to the report. Now the report is out, and you are complaining that he didn't stray far enough from that mandate. Here's the main issue. It doesn't take a SC to investigate a private citizen. DOJ is free to investigate, charge, etc, HRC on any potential crimes she may have committed, whether during the campaign or prior to it.

I thought he was charged to investigate ALL Russian attempts to influence or interfere in the election mule? Guess Hillary and Democrats weren't part of the election? Sure didn't have his attention did they mule?[eyeroll]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[atlkvb]

The SC was set up to investigate the claim of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians to impact the election with the ability to investigate potential crimes discovered during the course of that investigation. That's what Mueller did. I heard lots of complaints from the right about how Mueller was straying from his mandate prior to the report. Now the report is out, and you are complaining that he didn't stray far enough from that mandate. Here's the main issue. It doesn't take a SC to investigate a private citizen. DOJ is free to investigate, charge, etc, HRC on any potential crimes she may have committed, whether during the campaign or prior to it.

@mule_eer ? What's your comment on this?

Dr.Darrell Scott

Nunes: "Hillary's campaign met with Russians more than Trumps did"
Mueller: "No Comment"


2:14 PM - Jul 24, 2019

 

[wvu2007]

The SC was set up to investigate the claim of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians to impact the election with the ability to investigate potential crimes discovered during the course of that investigation. That's what Mueller did. I heard lots of complaints from the right about how Mueller was straying from his mandate prior to the report. Now the report is out, and you are complaining that he didn't stray far enough from that mandate. Here's the main issue. It doesn't take a SC to investigate a private citizen. DOJ is free to investigate, charge, etc, HRC on any potential crimes she may have committed, whether during the campaign or prior to it.

 

[Gunny46]

 

[Pospecteer]

I’m sure he’s heard of it, but I bet he’s not very familiar with it - since I’m almost certain he’s never shopped there, or been inside a store.

He knows that the people who shop there are smelly deplorable people, Ole Peter told him via text.

 

[mule_eer]

@mule_eer ? What's your comment on this?

Dr.Darrell Scott

Nunes: "Hillary's campaign met with Russians more than Trumps did"
Mueller: "No Comment"


2:14 PM - Jul 24, 2019

And what is stopping the FBI from investigating possible conspiracy charges there? She is not President. If she's guilty of a crime, investigate it and charge her.

 

[atlkvb]

The SC was set up to investigate the claim of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians to impact the election with the ability to investigate potential crimes discovered during the course of that investigation

Not quite @mule_eer

The Special Counsel investigation (also referred to as the Mueller Probe or Mueller Investigation) was a United States law enforcement and counterintelligence investigation of the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

Mr Rosenstein said that given the "unique circumstances", it was in the public interest for a special counsel independent "from the normal chain of command", to lead the investigation.

By placing authority for the probe into the hands of Mr Mueller, the idea was that it would be able to proceed without any interference, including from the White House.
Mr Rosenstein's order allowed Mr Mueller to look into:

• The Russian government's efforts to interfere in the election
• Any links or co-ordination between Russia and Trump campaign-linked individuals
• Any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation

 

[mofo]

I'd say exposing the media as a bunch of Leftist "fake news" shills is right up there![smoke]

What's even more amazing,
is the left media thinks
is they are "the Smarter".

And even more amazing
they are convinced.

 

[atlkvb]

And what is stopping the FBI from investigating possible conspiracy charges there? She is not President. If she's guilty of a crime, investigate it and charge her.

I believe that's underway as we blog Mule my Man. It's not the FBI per-se, but the DOJ is certainly involved, along with the IG and the Senate Intel committee.

 

[atlkvb]

What's even more amazing,
is the left media thinks
is they are "the Smarter".

And even more amazing
they are convinced.

They've been exposed mofo...and they think America hates Trump as much as they do. They are genuinely shocked when they see the crowds at his rallies, because they think they still control what Americans know. They don't, and he's exposed them as them worthless shills they are.

 

[mule_eer]

Not quite @mule_eer

The Special Counsel investigation (also referred to as the Mueller Probe or Mueller Investigation) was a United States law enforcement and counterintelligence investigation of the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

Mr Rosenstein said that given the "unique circumstances", it was in the public interest for a special counsel independent "from the normal chain of command", to lead the investigation.

By placing authority for the probe into the hands of Mr Mueller, the idea was that it would be able to proceed without any interference, including from the White House.
Mr Rosenstein's order allowed Mr Mueller to look into:

• The Russian government's efforts to interfere in the election
• Any links or co-ordination between Russia and Trump campaign-linked individuals
• Any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation

Or we could refer to the actual DOJ paperwork about the scope of the investigation.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

 

[mule_eer]

I believe that's underway as we blog Mule my Man. It's not the FBI per-se, but the DOJ is certainly involved, along with the IG and the Senate Intel committee.

And that's fine by me. If she or someone in her campaign committed a crime, I don't think they should be above the law.

 

[Gunny46]

And what is stopping the FBI from investigating possible conspiracy charges there? She is not President. If she's guilty of a crime, investigate it and charge her.

 

[atlkvb]

And that's fine by me. If she or someone in her campaign committed a crime, I don't think they should be above the law.

Agreed. I just wish Mueller had your same attitude for the past two years. We may have gotten to the bottom of this. Why didn't he even care to find out how that DNC server was hacked mule? That wasn't part of his investigation?

 

[atlkvb]

Or we could refer to the actual DOJ paperwork about the scope of the investigation.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

Was Trump running against himself mule? So the Russians were interfering only in his campaign? Mueller didn't care if they tried to mess up Hillary's campaign too?

 

[mule_eer]

Agreed. I just wish Mueller had your same attitude for the past two years. We may have gotten to the bottom of this. Why didn't he even care to find out how that DNC server was hacked mule? That wasn't part of his investigation?

The methodology used to hack the servers was in the report that you read.

 

[atlkvb]

The methodology used to hack the servers was in the report that you read.

Not who hacked them? He never detailed how that server was compromised and who did it? All he talked about in his report was it "likely" being done by the Russians. However he was charged to "investigate" ALL Russian attempts to interfere in our election. So why not investigate if they actually did it, and offer that in his report on Russian "interference"? Why was that not investigated Mule?

 

[mule_eer]

Was Trump running against himself mule? So the Russians were interfering only in his campaign? Mueller didn't care if they tried to mess up Hillary's campaign too?

Did you read the document? It clearly lays out in section b exactly what the scope of the investigation was. It was related to the Trump campaign only. And, if you think about it, that makes sense. Any crime committed by a losing campaign would not need a SC to investigate, charge, etc.

 

[Pospecteer]

Or we could refer to the actual DOJ paperwork about the scope of the investigation.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBIDirector James B. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:

(i)

(ii) (iii)

any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and

any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).

Please explain what this means? If they could go after financial fraud and Taxi medallions not associated with Russia, surely Russia interacting with a paid employee of the Clinton campaign is within the scope.