I'm not complaining about the results in the B1G. I'm complaining about the fit. And stating the fact that all that money (the only positive to being in the B1G) hasn't resulted in anything as far as results. We get neither a good fit, nor results from the money. It's two separate points. But, yeah I can see how they seem a little blurred.
Just like Colorado
- Thread starter Baxter48
- Start date
I'm not complaining about the results in the B1G. I'm complaining about the fit. And stating the fact that all that money (the only positive to being in the B1G) hasn't resulted in anything as far as results. We get neither a good fit, nor results from the money. It's two separate points. But, yeah I can see how they seem a little blurred.
With the way Bo dominated JC recruiting...he would KILL it with NIL.
Our team would be old, they would be mature, they would be good football players that wanted to get coached hard.
A lot of you guys are cry babies...which is ironic because that is what you say you hate about Bo.
It doesn't matter how nice you are, you have to win at least 9-10 per year. I agree.
Where we do disagree is that if your max ceiling is only 9-10 wins per year, then you can't be a crybaby a-hole. You dont even have to be a saint. Do that and you'll be here forever.
If you are going to be a crybaby a-hole, then you have to be winning 11-13 games per year. Do that, even as a jerk, and you'll be here forever.
I think that for sure...11+ wins means that even the BIGGEST baby fans, would be okay. I think...but some of those fans are so thin skinned that they still might demand that the coach french kisses them.
Why? Sports, as a fan, are about the wins/losses.
Are their sometimes some feel good stories? Of course! Are there sometimes some deeper meanings? Sure! Remember that Navy Seal that was on the team, that was a great story, even if he was truly horrible at football.
But for most fans, we only care about shallowness of the wins/losses. That is why we look at the scoreboard. That is totally okay.
Remember a few years ago when we had to pretend how NU was the best 3 win team ever? That was stupid, that was sad.
would you rather be Boise State, winning against no-names or compete against the best but not have as many wins?
Good question!
With the current playoff setting you are chasing 10 wins (even through Rhule would rather chase 3).
So from NU, I just want those 10 wins. Boise made it with 11 wins. I would be happy with that as well!
Who they play now during the regular season is almost not important. 10 wins in the Big Ten PROBABLY get your in the playoffs. But 4 losses keeps you out.
So I want wins. I would rather NU be 10-2 and get rocked in the first round of the playoffs (but still have that excitement of having that chance to win it all) than NU go 7-5 with a "tough" schedule that results in some lame *** bowl game.
I am guessing that 99% of us fans would rather make the playoffs instead of a bowl game.
Yeah, no doubt their fans have been having more fun than we have the last decade plus.
BUT, none of them have ever had as much fun as we did in 90s.
Tough one.
Man...I would have to look it up but had the 12 team playoff been around in the 90's, NU would have made it how many times? 5? 6?
FSU would have made it every year? I think?
is getting beat by Minnesota and Iowa every time we play fun for you?
I don't know and I'm probably too lazy to look it up. At least right now. But, that whole "would you rather be us or Boise State" hypothetical is an interesting one. It's a little like...
Option A) You get to bang a 6 once a month. Sometimes an 8, sometime a 4. But average a 6 and never a 9 or 10. But you're bangin' damn near every month.
Option B) You rarely get laid, but when you do, say every couple years, it's a 9 and there's even a chance at a 10 every few years.
Tough one. I think my dick would vote A though.
I count 8. Nebraska ranking going into their bowl game.
1990: #19
1991: #11
1992: #11
1993: #2
1994: #1
1995: #1
1996: #6
1997: #2
1998: #14
1999: #3
How about you ? You seem to enjoy those type losses.
What’s your life time Nebraska record again by the way?
Math isn’t hard.
is the AA meeting today?How about you ? You seem to enjoy those type losses.
What’s your life time Nebraska record again by the way?
Math isn’t hard.
That's not what I said, I asked if you enjoy getting beat by Minnesota and Iowa each time we play.
Is that a yes?
Maybe you’d do better on the your Clarkeyes all time record for you since you’ve been born.
You seem to be in luv with them since you’ve bring them up constantly.
You seem to be at odds with yourself.
Let us know when you get yourself sorted out.
Pelini beating Minnesota and Iowa was beating no-names.
I'd rather be modern Iowa than latter Pelini
I keep winning and you keep losing with your rebuttal not knowing any Husker or even worse Clarkeye history since you’re one on them.
Nothing but mouth breathing from imbecile.
Anytime you have to proclaim you've "won" an argument you've announced to everyone the exact opposite.
umm, k-state still lovin' on frank martin. the epitome of meh. so N's not the only fanbase.
