Jerry palm just said..

Goingfor9

All-Conference
Jan 27, 2003
16,528
3,599
113
If we can't get a 1 seed with our record, win the sec reg season and tournament and 10-0 in last 10 then the comittee did not follow its own rules
 

downw/ball-lineD

All-Conference
Jan 2, 2003
7,879
3,573
0
There is no fair, objective, or rational reason for Duke to be in consideration for a 1 seed. None. This talk is patently absurd
 

dave5164

All-Conference
Apr 6, 2009
4,119
2,599
0
I just don't see Duke getting a 2 seed or a 1 seed. When the committee gathered on Feb. 11th this year to announce Top 16 Duke was 16 and seeded #4 and UK was 12th and a 3 seed. Since that date Kentucky has went 7-0 not including SEC Tourney and Duke went 4-3 not including the ACC tourney. I believe that UK will be a 2 seed in the South and Duke being a 3 seed in the West.
 

uky8unc5

Heisman
May 22, 2002
17,431
12,939
113
Well, the way that Arkansas is man-handling Vandy, I'm glad we'll be considered before the final game tomorrow.
Word of advice: do not take up gambling, unless you already have. In which case, hire yourself a good bankruptcy Lawyer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aike
Mar 10, 2003
5,927
11,325
93
Duke isn't getting a 1 seed. This is all so people won't bat an eye when they get a 2 seed. They should actually be a 3 seed regardless if they win tonight based on their total body of work. They had lost 3 of their last 4 before entering the ACC tourney.
 
KSR

Latest

  1. 01 KSR Basketball LIVE BLOG: No. 23 Kentucky vs. No. 19 Texas Tech
  2. 02 KSR Podcasts 11 Personnel: Luckett's Play Sheet for Vanderbilt
  3. 03 KSR Football How Matt Ponatoski Juggles Kentucky Football and Baseball
  4. 04 KSR Basketball Kentucky, St. John's in talks for two-year series, starting at Arthur Ashe Stadium
  5. 05 KSR Basketball Zoom Diallo and Alex Wilkins continue to learn Mark Pope's system