I still stand by my premise that NIL is just more of the same. Instead of facilities it's now partly NIL, regardless we're never going to be competing in that stratosphere and will be a program that has to do more with less. That's always been the case. If anything I see a spreading out of talent at the top and on down. Texas and A&M have gotten players (example of some of that spreading out of talent at the top) but haven't seen it translate into big winning yet. I haven't seen tons of NIL money flowing through the mid tier and lower tier programs, might be some here and there but I don't see widespread big dollars being thrown around all over the place. I don't have a problem with NIL because I don't think it changes much and playing time and opportunity are still limited and at a premium. There's a balance there between NIL and playing opportunity that each individual will take into account. You will lose players and you will get players.
I look at the rankings currently and I see Syracuse, Cincy, KSU, Kansas, WF, JMU, TCU, Miss St...that looks pretty good to me. Of course that can all change by end of season but I see opportunity and exposure there for teams that normally might not get it and I doubt are big NIL spenders. Sam Hartman is still at WF. Grayson McCall still at Coastal Carolina. Will Rogers still at Miss St. Max Duggan didn't leave TCU even though he got moved to #2 and now is shining after the starter got hurt. Adrian Martinez is playing well for KSU after a difficult 4 years at Nebraska. Cam Rising is still at Utah. The list goes on. Players will stay or come and go and NIL is just one reason some movement will happen, it's not the only reason.