Make your own conclusions why that's the narrative. I have mine.Someone who is immersed in this (anth), please help me understand something:
-Everyone praises NYC for having the virus under control.
-The entire nation locked down from mid-March until June. Then in July, we started seeing spikes in FL, TX, etc. - when they mostly took the same measures as NYC.
-Seems to me, NYC benefited from the lockdown that covered the entire country, because, coincidentally, that happened at the right time for NYC. We should have done more targeted lockdowns -i.e., NYC in March through May; then focusing on other areas in June and July.
Just tired of hearing that US citizens F'd this up by refusing to comply. Also tired of hearing that "NYC did it the right way" when most of the country did the same thing that NYC did.
Seems to me that everyone bent over backward to comply for 2-3 months. If gov't had directed a more targeted, rolling approach to the lockdowns - i.e., lock down FL and TX at their peak (in June / July) not prematurely in March-April just because NYC was at peak, we wouldn't be hearing how NYC did it the right way and the rest of the country are defiant rubes, and we are solely to blame because this thing isn't beaten yet.
Please help me understand, because I'm admittedly a Stupid. Also, some of my assumptions may not be entirely accurate, I don't know.
NYC/NJ/Conn/Mass didn't do a great job AT ALL. To be clear their death rates are higher than anywhere in the world. But it's unfair to really criticize them because it's the worst case scenario for a virus. Tons of people, major hub, dense AF, mass transit, elevators and by the time they realized it was going down we weren't ready. Their issues also occurred in prime season where these later case increases, not really spikes, have happened in the off season for viruses. The biggest criticism is Cuomo signing off on sending nursing home patients back into the homes. That's really bad.
What NYC did right was hit 20+% of population getting infected. That seems to be burnout for the densest areas. It's not herd immunity but good enough to stamp out any increases with draconian lockdowns accompanying high seroprevalence and ridiculous amounts of testing/tracing. If they weren't being so ridiculous with this stupid, "NYC did it right", I'd feel sorry for them. Same people writing those articles are also writing, "Sweden really f*cked up" articles.
Florida and Texas did a good job. Death rates are really low.Appears a lot of the spread in those states started with migration workers and spread from there. They also benefited from a delayed increase and learning from NE mistakes. Death rate is really low, ltc rates for their demos are really low, hospitalization has been really manageable. All while having fairly relaxed lockdown measures.
Last edited: