Lets do it this way:
If you look at today's college basketball, meaning, this era, do you see UK as the top program?
Again, not historically, I'm talking about this era.
For me, the answer is simple… NO. In fact, I don't even know if UK is top 5. Villanova, duke, uNC, KU, Gonzaga and maybe even Baylor are ahead of us. If they weren't before 9-17, they are now.
It’s not just about titles and final fours, it's about the programs that have been consistently in the top 5 or 10. UK has not been. We’re always too young and we always have a new roster, so we end up taking more losses than a top program should.
As far as people bringing up gaps in titles and final fours, just stop it, nothing is equal. Cal gets paid a lot more, he has a private jet, he has had a thousand times the talent and he gets the benefit of using UK as a brand that those other coaches helped build.
Cal is also in an era where he has Nike and AAU that are huge advantages in recruiting and the quality of player that comes through the door. I'm not sure these facts have come up in the past, did Tubby and RP have AAU ball to go to for recruiting? Nike?
We can argue all day about how many FF's and titles Cal has, but even the biggest Cal fan (MD) has to admit that he should have more titles and final fours. They also have to admit that his in-game coaching has cost us a title or two.