Just reviewed Cox’s resume. Your description of her professional experience is wildly inaccurate.As long as Cox, the Ticket Sales manager for Dallas remains as GM, expect more bad decisions resulting in more bad contracts. Go back to selling tix.
Just reviewed Cox’s resume. Your description of her professional experience is wildly inaccurate.As long as Cox, the Ticket Sales manager for Dallas remains as GM, expect more bad decisions resulting in more bad contracts. Go back to selling tix.
Just reviewed Cox’s resume. Your description of her professional experience is wildly inaccurate.
Brittney Griner 2025 ≠ Brittney Griner 2013-2024So your point is that since she replaced the role previously held by Britney Griner (a 10x all star, and wnba champion) Reese is not a floor raiser?
Surprised there wasn’t a drop off there, instead she came in and was league DPOTY on a team that had the top 3 leaders in steals.
Uhhh, because maybe she doesn't understand the recruiting process??When was she selling tickets for Dallas?
And why do you think that is some blemish on her resume?
Not hardly. Why defend her incapabilities? I imagine her ticket sales were through the roof. Outside of the "Big Three", what "Einsteinian" selections has she made?Just reviewed Cox’s resume. Your description of her professional experience is wildly inaccurate.
Cox has held positions as VP, President, COO, and GM with different WNBA teams. If you think her background primarily involves ticket sales you’re an idiot.Not hardly. Why defend her incapabilities? I imagine her ticket sales were through the roof. Outside of the "Big Three", what "Einsteinian" selections has she made?
Oh yeah????????Cox has held positions as VP, President, COO, and GM with different WNBA teams. If you think her background primarily involves ticket sales you’re an idiot.
The players didn't want CC in the league? How can you even come up with something like that?Plain and simple. The players didn't want Clark in the league to begin with. Add to that, some in the media, who lack courage and fairness in their coverage so as not to create division among their viewers. And when the records began to fall at the hands of Clark, they really couldn't take it anymore, and things got physical. They didn't like the idea of someone new coming into the faux "Professional League" it claims to be, thereby exposing what they did as simply good, and maybe even mediocre. Through it all, Clark has been the "salmon swimming upstream", facing all the bulls*t the players and the league have thrown at her, with aid and assistance from select media outlets. Each time, she has emerged with class, dignity, and giving praise and credit toward her peers, many whom would not have done so to her.
#1: The "Old Guard" detested her, knowing their records would be in jeopardy.#1: The players didn't want CC in the league? How can you even come up with something like that?
#2: What "records"? We're they not physical with CC from day one?
#3: WNBA players don't like the idea of someone new coming into the league?
#4: No, what the league does is not mediocre. Are women's sports, in general, a worse product than men's sports? Of course. But the WNBA is the best women's basketball the world has to offer. Nothing mediocre about it. And nothing that is below CC.
#5: This is the crap from fans that gives CC a bad name
You answered nothing here.#1: The "Old Guard" detested her, knowing their records would be in jeopardy.
#2: The records that it took many moons for the "Old Guard" to finally accomplish. The physicality accelerated as the numbers for Clark didn't lie.
#3: Oh, the did/do like new players coming in as long as they fall in line. It's a "Process", remember?
#4: Referred to the level of play. "Old Guard" seasoned vets, even All-Stars, smoking the easiest of layups and hoisting airball 3 pointers. Be careful what you say about women's sports in general. That sounds misogynistic, as you said, "...in general." Underlined that for your convenience. See above.
#5: "Freudian Slip." Careful there.![]()
I gave you detailed information regarding your comments. Either you're in denial, or your ability to understand has been damaged beyond repair. In both cases, your credibility is Shot. Kaput. Ruinated. Extirpated. Capiche?You answered nothing here.
Nothing but further embarrassing conjectureI gave you detailed information regarding your comments. Either you're in denial, or your ability to understand has been damaged beyond repair. In both cases, your credibility is Shot. Kaput. Ruinated. Extirpated. Capiche?![]()
SIAP: Boston underwent arthroscopic surgery on her right knee yesterday. Lateral meniscus repair.
Well, I guess we know now what that "lower leg" issue was all season. Hopefully that means no Unrivaled for her this year.SIAP: Boston underwent arthroscopic surgery on her right knee yesterday. Lateral meniscus repair.
sports also showcase skills some legendary sports figures weren’t exactly great athletesYou answered nothing here.
And I said, "in general", in an attempt to be fair.
Sports are a physical activity. Actually, they showcase physical greatness. Men have more of it than women do. I have no problem saying that
Not inferior.sports also showcase skills some legendary sports figures weren’t exactly great athletes
Women don’t play above the rim like men do but I enjoy the women’s game for what it is and there are both great athletes and skilled athletes in the wnba
I’m actually more of a wrestling fan….. I wrestled and didn’t play basketball ….. so I’m not basketball expert but to call the women’s game an inferior product isn’t fair…… I would agree the wnba as a league needs to improve it’s officiating and maybe coaching but from a competitive standpoint there’s some pretty damned good games
And women’s wrestling is every bit as competitive as men’s is….. everything is relative as far as the difference in physical capabilities of men and women athletes but I differ with the notion it’s an inferior product if you just enjoy competition IMO……. but I raised 5 female athletes so I might be biased
Not inferior.![]()
Just not the men's game. But my point was it is nowhere near mediocre. Absolutely, world class women's basketball. I've watched the W for 30 years.
As for athletics in general. Pro men are incredibly skilled too. It's the physical athleticism that separates, and allows men to play most sports at their highest levels.
Not just sports. When it comes to anything that involves size, strength, speed, etc, I prefer men. When it comes to anything that involves emotional intelligence, I prefer women. I think that's completely fair to say
#1: Subject to debate.Not inferior.
#1: But my point was it is nowhere near mediocre.
#2: As for athletics in general. Pro men are incredibly skilled too. It's the physical athleticism that separates, and allows men to play most sports at their highest levels.
#3: Not just sports. When it comes to anything that involves size, strength, speed, etc, I prefer men. When it comes to anything that involves emotional intelligence, I prefer women. I think that's completely fair to say
Nice. Raising 5 kids alone, is a task. My wife and I did too, but they're not athletic.sports also showcase skills some legendary sports figures weren’t exactly great athletes
Women don’t play above the rim like men do but I enjoy the women’s game for what it is and there are both great athletes and skilled athletes in the wnba
I’m actually more of a wrestling fan….. I wrestled and didn’t play basketball ….. so I’m not basketball expert but to call the women’s game an inferior product isn’t fair…… I would agree the wnba as a league needs to improve it’s officiating and maybe coaching but from a competitive standpoint there’s some pretty damned good games
And women’s wrestling is every bit as competitive as men’s is….. everything is relative as far as the difference in physical capabilities of men and women athletes but I differ with the notion it’s an inferior product if you just enjoy competition IMO……. but I raised 5 female athletes so I might be biased
2. Athleticism to play each sport at its highest level, is to be worded more clearly. I see where my wording could have been confusing. But you've misinterpreted.#1: Subject to debate.
#2: Agree with the first sentence. However, in the second sentence, you create a narrative that women can not perform at their highest level due to physical constraints. If women are physically inferior, as you say, then how does that limit their ability to perform at a level comparable to, or exceeding the level of performance by peers, who are under the same "Constraints?".
#3: Emotional Intelligence doesn't win games. You can be emotionally intelligent and level, and still lose games. After seeing some of the "Physicality" and emotional outbursts toward other players and the fans, how can you say the W players are emotionally intelligent anyway?You're also generalizing and creating a subjective narrative where, in you're words, "when it comes to anything..." men are brutes, and women are emotionally intelligent.
When it comes to emotional stability however, the W is in the top 10% percent of lunacy.![]()
2. Play each sport at its highest level, is to be more clear. I see where my wording could have been confusing. But you've misinterpreted.#1: Subject to debate.
#2: Agree with the first sentence. However, in the second sentence, you create a narrative that women can not perform at their highest level due to physical constraints. If women are physically inferior, as you say, then how does that limit their ability to perform at a level comparable to, or exceeding the level of performance by peers, who are under the same "Constraints?".
#3: Emotional Intelligence doesn't win games. You can be emotionally intelligent and level, and still lose games. After seeing some of the "Physicality" and emotional outbursts toward other players and the fans, how can you say the W players are emotionally intelligent anyway?You're also generalizing and creating a subjective narrative where, in you're words, "when it comes to anything..." men are brutes, and women are emotionally intelligent.
When it comes to emotional stability however, the W is in the top 10% percent of lunacy.![]()
2. Athleticism to play each sport at its highest level, is to be worded more clearly. I see where my wording could have been confusing. But you've misinterpreted.
3. I never said anything about emotional intelligence, when it comes to basketball, or the WNBA. Read better.
A certain percentage CC fans are in the top 5% of lunacy. And that's too bad for CC
2. Play each sport at its highest level, is to be more clear. I see where my wording could have been confusing. But you've misinterpreted.
3. I never said anything about emotional intelligence, when it comes to basketball, or the WNBA. Read better.
A certain percentage CC fans are in the top 5% of lunacy. And that's too bad for CC
eyes is an acquired taste fer sher….. he does occasionally make good points other times he fills the air with words unnecessarily….. I really try hard to see the good in everyone …… some people make that really hardNice. Raising 5 kids alone, is a task. My wife and I did too, but they're not athletic.You know, I'd really like to give @eyesofhawk a "Likey" too, but we're not at that stage yet.
![]()
Hawkeye Report Football Recruiting
Iowa coaches hit the recruiting trail during bye week
Rivals Basketball Recruiting
5-star RJ Evans discusses Kentucky, Louisville, and his NBA ambitions
On3 Football
College Football Playoff nearing deal to expand to 24 teams
Hawkeye Report Olympics
Projecting the lineup: 2026-27 Iowa men's wrestling
Rivals Basketball Recruiting
Top-10 prospect Grant Duggins recaps UNC visit; breaks down recruitment, South Carolina, NC State, Iowa, Florida State