All Democratic Senators except 3 support infanticide

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (S. 311)

Not invoked, 53-44




 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,304
2,377
113
How does a catholic vote for a Democrat? If im not mistaken they are totally against abortion & dont even want to pull the plug on people who are brain dead.
I could be way wrong on this ...
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,860
282
83
All but three Dem senators support the killing of all American children who are < 1 y.o.? dang

in·fan·ti·cide
Dictionary result for infanticide
/inˈfan(t)əˌsīd/
noun
noun: infanticide; plural noun: infanticides
  1. 1.
    the crime of killing a child within a year of birth.
    "cases of infanticide often involve extreme emotional disturbance"
    • the practice in some societies of killing unwanted children soon after birth.
      "female infanticide was practiced to reduce the population in times of famine"
  2. 2.
    a person who kills an infant, especially their own child.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
814
113
All but three Dem senators support the killing of all American children who are < 1 y.o.? dang

in·fan·ti·cide
Dictionary result for infanticide
/inˈfan(t)əˌsīd/
noun
noun: infanticide; plural noun: infanticides
  1. 1.
    the crime of killing a child within a year of birth.
    "cases of infanticide often involve extreme emotional disturbance"
    • the practice in some societies of killing unwanted children soon after birth.
      "female infanticide was practiced to reduce the population in times of famine"
  2. 2.
    a person who kills an infant, especially their own child.
If they are born alive and killed they would likely be less than one year old. I hope that obvious explanation doesnt warp your idiot brain.
 

boomerwv

Freshman
Jan 16, 2008
9,988
79
48
GOP = Party of hyperbole

Nevermind that anyone surviving an abortion is already required to recieve medical attention under the 2002 law.

Dont you guys have some national emergency to fake? How do you have time to vote on bills that are already law?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
814
113
GOP = Party of hyperbole

Nevermind that anyone surviving an abortion is already required to recieve medical attention under the 2002 law.

Dont you guys have some national emergency to fake? How do you have time to vote on bills that are already law?
So why did they vote against it? Stop trying to deflect.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
So why did they vote against it? Stop trying to deflect.
This bill is an attempt to continue to shape the national narrative on abortion. It’s already illegal to kill a born child, it doesn’t happen. The only thing close to it is when a child is forced to live only with life support, then it’s a decision to stop assisted living by the parents. It just gets the conversation moving in the direction of WHEN it should be illegal to abort a child in the womb.

Late term abortions happen overwhelmingly when an ultrasound in 3rd tri reveal a major deformity that threatens the child’s ability to even live outside the womb, and if they are able to live, they would be severely disabled. Most (and I mean almost all) parents that choose this option, must still birth the child and are devastated by the tragedy. Parents who had to endure this pain have supported the right to make this decision for other parents, because it is the most caring option.

It’s just not the conversation pro-lifers think it is for real. It’s just a political strategy.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
All but three Dem senators support the killing of all American children who are < 1 y.o.? dang

in·fan·ti·cide
Dictionary result for infanticide
/inˈfan(t)əˌsīd/
noun
noun: infanticide; plural noun: infanticides
  1. 1.
    the crime of killing a child within a year of birth.
    "cases of infanticide often involve extreme emotional disturbance"
    • the practice in some societies of killing unwanted children soon after birth.
      "female infanticide was practiced to reduce the population in times of famine"
  2. 2.
    a person who kills an infant, especially their own child.

Read gooder.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
This bill is an attempt to continue to shape the national narrative on abortion. It’s already illegal to kill a born child, it doesn’t happen. The only thing close to it is when a child is forced to live only with life support, then it’s a decision to stop assisted living by the parents. It just gets the conversation moving in the direction of WHEN it should be illegal to abort a child in the womb.

Late term abortions happen overwhelmingly when an ultrasound in 3rd tri reveal a major deformity that threatens the child’s ability to even live outside the womb, and if they are able to live, they would be severely disabled. Most (and I mean almost all) parents that choose this option, must still birth the child and are devastated by the tragedy. Parents who had to endure this pain have supported the right to make this decision for other parents, because it is the most caring option.

It’s just not the conversation pro-lifers think it is for real. It’s just a political strategy.

WRONG

It's to override this evil, your tribe's evil.

https://www.lifenews.com/2019/01/25...l-care-for-babies-born-alive-after-abortions/
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Lol, **** the GOPs fake moral high ground, quit being pussies then and just run on abolishing Roe vs. Wade, it's a winner!
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
814
113
This bill is an attempt to continue to shape the national narrative on abortion. It’s already illegal to kill a born child, it doesn’t happen. The only thing close to it is when a child is forced to live only with life support, then it’s a decision to stop assisted living by the parents. It just gets the conversation moving in the direction of WHEN it should be illegal to abort a child in the womb.

Late term abortions happen overwhelmingly when an ultrasound in 3rd tri reveal a major deformity that threatens the child’s ability to even live outside the womb, and if they are able to live, they would be severely disabled. Most (and I mean almost all) parents that choose this option, must still birth the child and are devastated by the tragedy. Parents who had to endure this pain have supported the right to make this decision for other parents, because it is the most caring option.

It’s just not the conversation pro-lifers think it is for real. It’s just a political strategy.
You are the one trying to shape a narrative. If you vote against a bille requiring a doctor to save a born baby you support infanticide.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
You are the one trying to shape a narrative. If you vote against a bille requiring a doctor to save a born baby you support infanticide.
Every time I begin to give the right credit for their positions and approach, this kind of Bullsh1t comes out. When all the propaganda gets flushed out, you guys are just straight liars and almost completely unAmerican.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
814
113
Every time I begin to give the right credit for their positions and approach, this kind of Bullsh1t comes out. When all the propaganda gets flushed out, you guys are just straight liars and almost completely unAmerican.
Im unamerican but your *** wants to give free healthcare to everyone EXCEPT a baby that is born accidently instead of aborted. *** your high browed hypocritical busllshit. You support killing babies.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Im unamerican but your *** wants to give free healthcare to everyone EXCEPT a baby that is born accidently instead of aborted. *** your high browed hypocritical busllshit. You support killing babies.
What is unAmerican about free healthcare? Guess it’s not Christian to help the ill either is it?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
814
113
What is unAmerican about free healthcare? Guess it’s not Christian to help the ill either is it?
There is no such thing as free healthcare so there is that. I agree we ahould help the ill. I also agree we should give living babies a chance.
 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
Every time I begin to give the right credit for their positions and approach, this kind of Bullsh1t comes out. When all the propaganda gets flushed out, you guys are just straight liars and almost completely unAmerican.
Screw other opinions, I believe you nailed it with this entire rant.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
There is no such thing as free healthcare so there is that. I agree we ahould help the ill. I also agree we should give living babies a chance.
JFC....it’s just a mischaracterization of the issue. It’s a foolish bill that makes an illegal act illegal, and anyone supporting it wants laws on the books to protect laws already in place.

Now if you believe anyone that can be kept alive via life support should be kept alive by law....you got a point....but as a son, father(?), and merciful person you should want that choice to be left to families not to the government.

I surely do not think humans (babies included) should be forced to suffer in a body that doesn’t give them a living experience because the government wants to shape a fvcking narrative and win elections. It’s a choice for families to make.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
There is no such thing as free healthcare so there is that. I agree we ahould help the ill. I also agree we should give living babies a chance.
I want affordable access to good healthcare for everyone. However we get there, I don’t give a ****.
 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
GOP are attempting to raise an old reliable social issue so the fake outrage of it can be used during an election that is 22 months away. They are desperate and it is a general strategy being put forth throughout the states and now the federal level. Party of Trump do not care about the struggles of American families or the serious issues confronting the country; only concern is getting re elected and grabbing power.