Old people suck...
The under 30 age group rules!!
(Is this what we're doing? Or no?)
This is part of it. Matt says he thinks the criticism is funny but it clearly bothers him or he wouldn't respond. Nobody likes to be criticized or disliked. Think Matt does blow off the goofey ones who are clearly over the top with their dislike but the other general feeling out there that he rubs a lot of people the wrong way does bother him like it would anybody and that's part of why he tunes in and reacts.Jones has the thinnest skin of any so called celebrity not named Trump that I've ever seen.
I think you completely misunderstood Matt's intent. He was specifically saying he is NOT apologizing. That he believes his comments to be true and accurate. That is the opposite of one believing they need to apologize.Wow! Was there an apology in that court brief?
I said some on here. I didn't say who and the thread shows it. If you truly read my post I was only referring to his initial generalized insult from his show then his multi paged paragraph trying to justify and minimize what he said. If you support him that's great. The thread start with an extremely arrogant, condescending and self serving "address" by Matt. If you don't see that then that's up to you but many posters did.Speak for yourself about any animosity to Matt Jones. Many of the posters on here use this as a forum to vent their frustrations with negative comments - their / your privilege. I listen to KSR everyday and read this site every day and appreciate the fact we have year round sites to read / hear about UK basketball. I and many of my old friends do not post often but do read, listen to and appreciate Matt Jones. The popularity of the remote broadcasts and the size of his radio listening audiences is testament to the fact that not everyone shares your negative opinion of Mr. Jones. Thank you Matt Jones.He does a great job of representing UK.
We both agree he was not apologizing.I think you completely misunderstood Matt's intent. He was specifically saying he is NOT apologizing. That he believes his comments to be true and accurate. That is the opposite of one believing they need to apologize.
Now he did provide further clarification that he was not speaking to the board as a collective, but just a select few...and that he does believe they are "old idiots". I guess they know who they are?
IDK about jealous, but I certainly would love do strive to do what he does. I'm too much of a coward to leave my profession and do that. Takes guts.
This is kind of like that time you called Cal the biggest sleazeball is college basketball only to backtrack.
Keep being Matt, Mr. Jones.
I don't agree at all with how JONES is handling this but you're out of Line. with Jedwar.Why don't you kiss his *** a little more.
that's what I've been doing as well - sometimes longer. After the Wisconsin loss in 2015 I stayed away for two weeks.This board is like going to a small town county fair after a loss. There are people posting negative stuff that I have never seen or heard of before. They only come out for these occasions. I tend to have a 48 hour rule for this board after a loss. Let the negative Nancy threads work their way down to page 2.
The Old Idiots are the only ones offended by any of this. Of which, I'm not a part.Wow! Was there an apology in that court brief? You even made a generalization that most on here lean toward the negative. Still stick with the old idiots comment. I have no beef with you but that was one of the most arrogant, condescending, and self-serving posts I've read on here.
I don't agree at all with how JONES is handling this but you're out of Line. with Jedwar.
Don't the responses in this thread exactly prove Jones' point????
Why do you care if I give him props for doing what he does. Read the other Jones thread and then tell me I praised him in every post. I think it takes guts for anyone to leave a profession to pursue their true dream, not just him.Go back and read the thread. His every post is praising Jones for something. My goodness.
Can we get a Cliff Notes version of this?
I'm 55 not sure if I'm old or not been told by others I'm pretty smart but have done my fair share of idiotic things. How ever when you say that most of a group are old idiots then you are swinging a broad paint brush that may hit people not in that category and even then it's an insult so getting a negative response is expected. Blindly defending someone because you like them regardless of what they say could be considered idiotic. Making such a generalized statement like Matt said is idiotic as well.The Old Idiots are the only ones offended by any of this. Of which, I'm not a part.
But he's not throwing anyone under the bus about it is he.Go back and read the thread. His every post is praising Jones for something. My goodness.
Wow! Was there an apology in that court brief? You even made a generalization that most on here lean toward the negative. Still stick with the old idiots comment. I have no beef with you but that was one of the most arrogant, condescending, and self-serving posts I've read on here.
Agree KYFOSSIL.
I remember the "Magloire52" days. I was usually on the "Magloire52" side. I did not know at the time that he considered me and old idiot.
We all assume things all the time, but calling hundreds of folks old idiots is quite astounding. If you are going to be on public outlets you MUST engage your damned brain and not insult your market. How stupid from a Sales and Marketing perspective.
Great post. Not even in reference to Matt Jones but just as a general "how to treat people" post.This is part of it. Matt says he thinks the criticism is funny but it clearly bothers him or he wouldn't respond. Nobody likes to be criticized or disliked. Think Matt does blow off the goofey ones who are clearly over the top with their dislike but the other general feeling out there that he rubs a lot of people the wrong way does bother him like it would anybody and that's part of why he tunes in and reacts.
But Matt could go a long way in improving that by just not being so know it all in his approach. He is very smart and intuitive and is right in his perception of a lot of things, and not so much on some others, but what a lot of smart people like him fail to realize is people don't always care about how much you know and whether you're right all the time as much as they do how you treat people and how you come off. Modesty goes a long way especially in this state. I think deep down Matt is a good guy and real fan and like he said is more conservative on some things that you think, but just has that "I can't stand when someone seems ignorant or wrong about something and have to correct them now" impulse that gets him in trouble. That's okay when people you are dealing with are truly ignorant and obnoxious about it and need set straight. But not everybody is calling or writing to make a legal point and don't use precise language and aren't even trying to debate all the details of an issue. They are just trying to make a general point or share their thoughts. Most people understand that and take them for what they are, just a well intentioned person trying to chime in as imperfect as they may go about it. Matt has an impulse to want to correct everything anybody says and make sure he's set the ignorant straight and that just gets old.
The irony is you would think Matt would know this too! I think he actually does and just cant help himself and believes he wishes he were a little more patient or understanding of his audience, but its his impulse and something he has to fight. I think he want's to be more liked overall and that will have to be corrected to accomplish that.
Just my two cents worth.
Except I didnt say that...I said the folks who constantly criticize me on here non-stop are "old idiots." And I stand by that...those that blast me consistently aren't exactly the ones that I feel need to have their feelings not hurt in response. Since I don't believe you are one of those, I wasn't putting you in the group.
Quite a long set of comments. Appreciate those of you who have said positive things. Had a great crowd today in Bardstown, including a couple of folks who said they post here.
I say this with respect...if the fact that a person who runs a website (or radio show) has personal political opinions different than yours means you cant support them, then I don't know how you cheer for UK, which has coaches and players whose opinions are of a similar ilk. If you go through life believing that you will only interact with or "support" those with whom you agree you will either (a) wall yourself off to at least half of the country or (b) be naive as to just how many people disagree with you that you don't even know
As for the second point that there are a "helluva lot of people just like you"...that may be correct. But our site traffic has been consistent for the past 5 years and when I don't "stick to sports" our radio ratings actually go up. There is increased political polarization and those who (like you) seem unable to hear any view that isn't there own...but I think a response to that has been the increase of people who like civility and diversity of opinion...and don't take themselves and their opinions so seriously. That latter group is probably the basis for our audiences
If I want to hear someone's political views I'll actively seek them out. I don't want to hear them when I'm trying to listen to a show that's supposed to be focused on UK athletics. It's obvious you are using your show to set up a future political career. If you want to do that, fine, but you will turn people off eventually.
As for your really bad comparison to cheering for UK athletics... I have no problem that Cal or any other staffer is a democrat. They are entitled to their views. That's what makes America special. However, that doesn't mean I want to hear his input on right to work laws during his weekly radio show. I watch and follow UK to get away from crap like politics.
Passive way of saying "see, my comments didn't impact the following I have from Catsillustrated members".
You're not fooling anyone. You said something stupid, you realized it could impact your ratings. You thought about it, decided to come on here to explain yourself. You're pride wouldn't let you come out and apologize to anyone you might have offended, but your post made you feel like you did. Your ultimate goal was to explain yourself without apologizing and have people like JedWar say, "it's ok buddy". You accomplished that, but many of us see right through it.
I can assure you that this site is where I get all of my information. Your site is terrific, but it doesn't go over our heads that it's entirely out of political agenda when Ms. Tyler Thompson posts the video from Jimmy Kimmel discussing his child's heart problem. It plays right into ObamaCare and the agenda of the left. You don't think people know when someone is passively trying to push their agenda? Or how about when she posted on the morning after the election a video of the national anthem being performed "for anyone who needs cheering up". You think that goes right over our heads?
I used to listen to your show everyday. Loved it. But I don't anymore. And it's not because I think you push a liberal agenda via the show. I actually haven't heard you do it on the radio. It's because Tyler Thompson, and your website does. Being 100% honest. I loved your show. But I won't support it anymore because I don't want to support those opinions. Bruce Springsteen is my all time favorite musician. Haven't bought an album by him in years. Same thing. You might think, "big deal one person doesn't go to the site because they disagree with our views." Well I have news for you, there are a helluva lot of people just like me. It will catch up one day. Good day.
Hope this thread finds everyone in a chipper mood. I wanted to take a second and write after my comments today about this Board on my radio show. I have always had a terrific love/hate relationship with this message board forum, going back to when it was originally Kentucky Sports Report before the merger (what year was that?). There is zero doubt that without this board and my "Magloire52" days, I would still be a lawyer and having a miserable time with my existence. The message board communities, especially of the old days, were the centerpiece of my UK Fandom and were the original basis for everything UK sports related on the Internet. Those days, ranging from the big online recruitments (Darius Rice anyone?) to the message board feuds were some of my favorite times in the UK online world and I do miss them...which is probably why I still post here from time to time.
Today I said on the radio a few things that I do believe...some positive and some negative. I said this is undoubtedly the biggest UK message board community on the internet. There was a time when there were many such places but that time has passed and honestly this is the last relevant one that exists. I often say that there are really only three sources of relevant UK information...KSR, Cats Illustrated and Twitter. The mainstream media sources can all be found via Twitter and if you read those three places, you know all there is to know. With that said, I do think message boards such as this on average draw an older crowd. While there are some younger people here, an entire generation has grown up having their UK discussions on Twitter and other social media. Some still find their way here, but most of the posters on here (I bet) are 35-40 and over. There are undoubtedly lurkers of all ages, and those that get news from here, but posting on message boards is what most of us do when we are bored at work (as I am now). This is the largest message board community of UK and its not close. But as those of around in the old days can say, message boards as a whole aren't what they once were in terms of traffic. More options now exist, from blogs to social media, that didn't before. The fact that this place has as many people as it does (when message boards of ALL Schools have seen significant drops) is a testament to its success.
My complaint today about "old idiots" on this message board was aimed at a small, but loud segment of folks here...the ones that bash me every single time my name is mentioned. They of course have a right to their opinion but I am constantly amused by the "I DONT LISTEN TO HIM but he is an idiot, blah, blah blah" threads that follow ever time my Beetlejuice is said in the crowd. It is usually followed by how I am liberal (somewhat true, although less than you think), single (true but happily), gay (not true), arrogant (true of most people who believe anyone would care about their opinion about anything), a jerk (hopefully not true, but I do get riled up from time to time) or a dork (undoubtedly true). Those folks bash me all the time but then get royally offended if I say anything about them, usually becoming quite angry in response. I do think those folks are often (or always) "old idiots" who care less about debating a particular point, rather than blasting me personally. Their act amuses me greatly and I have no problem mocking them in return. I only wish that when, as happened today, they begin their outrage, they would at least quote me correctly and in context.
But the VAST majority of the folks on here seem like good people. I read this site almost every day and pick up something from it every time. People like to accuse me or KSR of "stealing information" but that is honestly silly. We all hear the same information and whether people say it or not, we all have sources even if we don't share them. What I do use this forum for is to get a pulse of the fan base....specifically the hardcore, long-time fans who are engaged significantly in the details of the programs and who lean towards the negative side. I think that is a fair description of most (but not all) of the posters here. I use Twitter for the 20-35 year old fan, Snapchat for the 25 and under, Facebook for the 40 and over, my radio show for the broad fan base, the TV show for the Lexington/Lou fan, etc. I have been a part of doing demographic studies of every form of UK media (it was a big investment a couple years back and the resulting numbers have helped fuel how I approach all of my work) and they follow patterns that are fascinating. Each represents a slice of the overall pie. This board is the best to figure out what the hardcore group intimately engaged in every story is thinking. And I use it as such.
Long story short, this is the best place to find out what a segment of the fan base is thinking. That is crucial for my job...I enjoy reading this site and think the folks that run it (Rowland, TJ, etc) do a really good job. The anger and hatred of a few (along with my schedule) make me post less than I used to, but it is part of my daily preparation routine. The fact that there exists a small group of "old idiots" who believe I am the epitome of all thats wrong with the world amuses me, but won't stop my visits.