Factual? Oklahoma may have passed on Alexander because they had 2 higher rated LB recruits. Cheerleaders here post similar things all the time explaining why PSU didn't really "miss" on a recruit. But hey.....
So what you are saying is factual? You have no idea how Alexander was viewed by Oklahoma. If they passed on him or they valued him ahead of the kids they have, so why speculate. Rivals rates Alexander almost 100 spots above Epps, so you always saying that OU has two higher rated LBs isn't factual at every level.
Bottom line, Alexander rated at 124 in the rivals overall ranking. He's pretty good and it appears he has been the top guy on PSUs board at LB pretty much from day one. Why cant you say. "He appears to be a good get and be done with." and not go into all this other crap as to why he may not be very good when people talk about how happy they are with him coming to PSU.
Nah, that isn't very fun.