The guys on the Wolfpacker board want to thank you, particularly aligned_ for_9, for updates. We are a small but very active group that has worked at feeding information to the appropriate parties. The Wolves Den is premium so it is not available to most. If anything really significant is posted that I can share, I will. BTW, in early July a detailed letter explaining the infamous 12 hour policy was sent to the right people. This agrees exactly with what aligned said happened in Aug.
North Carolina Scandal Etc
- Thread starter Catswin9
- Start date
@wolfheart, thanks for sharing all the info you can. You guys have done a tremendous job keeping the fire burning on the UNCheats. Can't wait to see them get their just reward. 
opcorn:
opcorn:Excellent idea! We've got a guy at Devils Illustrated who makes things like that all the time. Just forwarded him the gif with your request. Will post it back here when he finishes it up.Someone needs to put Huckleberrys head on this gif.
This posted on Inside Carolina a little bit ago. If this is their punishment, that is not "getting hammered." I obviously don't know who this guy is and hope he's wrong.
As you know, I have been here a few times with predictions over the years. Only when I hear from someone who is connected will I post it. I am four for four to date over a few years. These are not my predictions because I have no way to know. I am not on the inside, not even close.
A while back I was told by a very reliable source the UNC was not expecting any sanctions from The NCAA for Men's Basketball. Rather, Men's Soccer and Women's Soccer and Basketball would be harmed. I stated this in here.
I have just heard from the same source that UNC is now expecting a one year post season ban and a one year loss of two scholarships for Men's Basketball. This person is normally right on the money but we will see.
As you know, I have been here a few times with predictions over the years. Only when I hear from someone who is connected will I post it. I am four for four to date over a few years. These are not my predictions because I have no way to know. I am not on the inside, not even close.
A while back I was told by a very reliable source the UNC was not expecting any sanctions from The NCAA for Men's Basketball. Rather, Men's Soccer and Women's Soccer and Basketball would be harmed. I stated this in here.
I have just heard from the same source that UNC is now expecting a one year post season ban and a one year loss of two scholarships for Men's Basketball. This person is normally right on the money but we will see.
IMHO, it is going to be a lot more than that slap on the wrist
for a UNC fan to even admit any punishment is going to happen is a miracle
that tells me that guy is worried
Since his "source" first told him men's basketball wasn't getting punished and now he's saying he is expecting a 1 year postseason ban and a loss of a couple of scholarships, I'd say he doesn't know crap and is just guessing. There's a few people who have inside information but this guy isn't one of them.
We'll see. However, if this is true, then that means that MBB would have to have done something to warrant a punishment. The only thing they were alleged to have done was receive extra benefits. So this would mean that MBB players definitely received extra benefits.
What UNC seems to be hiding their head in the sand about is the other aspect of extra benefits. That is, any player who receives them is immediately ineligible until they go through the reinstatement process. UNC never submitted these players for reinstatement, so any of the players that prompted this possible ban were ineligible during all games played after first receiving the benefit.
And we all know what happens when a school plays an athlete ruled ineligible.
I would also add that it would be highly unusual for the NCAA to be discussing specific penalties with UNC, especially prior to sending the amended NOA. Determination of penalties falls under the purview of the COI process.
This may be what UNC is hoping for, or intends to self-impose, but I would highly doubt this came from the NCAA.
UNC will NEVER self-impose.......it goes against the very grain of everything that matters to them......THE BANNERS.......the school could burn to the ground as long as the banners are protected...
Haha........you guys are on the ball. Everything you just posted is what popped in my head immediately.
1) Waaaay too light of a punishment
2) Source is changing his tune which means he isn't very reliable to begin with
3) How do they know the penalties when we haven't seen the ANOA
4) I think this is what they are "hoping" for
5) Went from saying men's basketball will get nothing, to now saying there will be penalties
1) Waaaay too light of a punishment
2) Source is changing his tune which means he isn't very reliable to begin with
3) How do they know the penalties when we haven't seen the ANOA
4) I think this is what they are "hoping" for
5) Went from saying men's basketball will get nothing, to now saying there will be penalties
This makes a great deal of sense,they are hoping for an outcome such as described.I have doubts they would self impose anything unless it is so bad they see it as a last ditch effort to save a banner
Exactly, I wonder how can anyone can know ANY punishment details before the CoI has even met. We're still awaiting confirmation of UNC*** receiving the Amended NOA, yet we see reports from both sides specifying various conflicting punishment details.
Remember guys, Syracuse only got one year ban. UNC may just get 1 or 2 years. But if the academic fraud charge is there, they will have to forfeit probably 2 banners and almost all the wins under royboy. That would suit me fine.
Has the NC State fan (can't remember his name) posted anything recently? The one that seems to be highly connected and rarely posts but when he does it's extremely thorough?
Here you are..........
manalishi wrote: As a new week begins, chatter has definitely started to pick up in certain private circles. An "unofficial" gag order appears to have been lifted; will it extend to the public domain soon? We shall see.
And for those in CH: Are you a member (or do you know a member) of the RC, and you've been smiling these last few weeks about all that "good news" you were told?
A little clue -- DS was 100% wrong about TWR when he was in his former position, and he's 100% wrong about what he's been spreading more recently in his new spot, as well.
Enjoy that.
manalishi wrote: As a new week begins, chatter has definitely started to pick up in certain private circles. An "unofficial" gag order appears to have been lifted; will it extend to the public domain soon? We shall see.
And for those in CH: Are you a member (or do you know a member) of the RC, and you've been smiling these last few weeks about all that "good news" you were told?
A little clue -- DS was 100% wrong about TWR when he was in his former position, and he's 100% wrong about what he's been spreading more recently in his new spot, as well.
Enjoy that.
Thanks. I love that guy. Throws in just enough information to show you that he's connected but also keeps a level of mystery. It's like reading poetry.
That's hilarious!
I have zero doubt that this Heel poster was told what he claims. However, the fact is that only a VERY small handful of Ram's Club members actually know what is going on. All but a select few are being fed the PR spin in order to "keep the morale up." If the truth was made known....it would hurt UNC's recruiting even more...and think of the potential money that would be lost due to desolate fans.
UNC "insiders" have been wrong literally every step of the way. They're not suddenly about to start being right.
Again I "ask".... Given the new info given to the NCAA in July 2015...what would "possibly" that UNC compliance 8 months to do?
Expect lots of athletes to be retroactively ruled ineligible...based on UNC's own policy
Expect lots of athletes to be retroactively ruled ineligible...based on UNC's own policy
I think people are missing the (unitended?) humor in this post. The guy starts by saying he is "four for four" based on the predictions from his source. He then proceeds to say that his "very reliable" source was wrong and that UNC will be punished. Ummm, what happened to that "four for four?"
To paraphrase Forde:
The NCAA made its bed (with the Memphis ruling). Now they have to sleep in it.
What secret government mission is he on this week? Last I checked, he was providing a riddle about hopping Airforce jets to a base near NCAA headquarters. LOL, that guy is either well connected or has watched too much Get Smart. Maybe both.
Wins must be removed from Roy's record, and by 20% worse more than the Boeheim ruling. That is the thing that UNC cannot justify ignoring all the fake results to let players play.
This penalty will point to so many sports, it will be a lengthy press conference.
That COI committee has a standard to uphold rules on this and their credibility is in question until this gets publicized.
We saw where Samford lost wins and championships because they 'incorrectly' placed kids in different majors via their guidance. This was a blatant push to ignore the rules and allow the agenda to continue. This is the only reason 'Wayward Wayne' is not still employed in Chapel HIll....Roy's close confidant, right hand man.
This penalty will point to so many sports, it will be a lengthy press conference.
That COI committee has a standard to uphold rules on this and their credibility is in question until this gets publicized.
We saw where Samford lost wins and championships because they 'incorrectly' placed kids in different majors via their guidance. This was a blatant push to ignore the rules and allow the agenda to continue. This is the only reason 'Wayward Wayne' is not still employed in Chapel HIll....Roy's close confidant, right hand man.
Fraudulent wins = forfeited wins. Final Fours and Titles too.
2 year post season ban
reduction in scholarships x 2 years
1 year television ban
That would be a joy that is almost insurmountable. Like the birth of a child joy. Like looking at your lottery ticket and realizing you won joy. Like looking at UNCheat fans crying for years joy. OH MY.
SIAP:
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/education/article72635327.html
UNC is guilty as sin. And they're on the verge of taking the NCAA down with them.
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/education/article72635327.html
UNC is guilty as sin. And they're on the verge of taking the NCAA down with them.
This just makes ya wanna throw up. Basically..........."Well.........uhh.............the athletes should have known these were fake classes, and besides...............the statute of limitation is up. We're good".
[sick]
Last edited:
blame the victim . . . you gotta love this line:
UNC and the NCAA also said the former athletes had reason to know something was amiss when they took the fake classes, but they didn’t raise objections at that time.
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/education/article72635327.html#storylink=cpy
Taking into account the actual cheating and also considering how UNC has attempted to cover it all up with lies, propaganda, and deceit, they need to be punished past, present, and future.
Past - vacate anything and everything that involved ineligible players.
Present - fine the living **** out of them by making them repay all the $'s they have been given from anything that was associated with the vacated games (tourney money, bowl money, TV money, etc., etc.). UNC takes out a full page ad in USA Today and the 5 largest in state newspaper publications apologizing to the student athletes that were wronged, the NCAA, the ACC, all other colleges they competed against, and the state of North Carolina.
Future - 5 years of post season bans so they can snivel and cry their *** off after the second year to get it reduced to 3. Massive and debilitating scholarship reductions for a period of at least 5 years. 10 year period where UNC pays an outside and independent firm (selected by the NCAA) to oversee and perform random unannounced audits of how their SA's and academics coexist.
I didn't include TV ban on the "future" because of TV contracts in place for conference games and the like. But the big reason to me for no TV ban is that the post season bans and scholly losses should ensure they suck out loud for a minimum of 6 years and I want to be able to watch them get hammered time and time and time again in the comfort of my den while I LOL.
Past - vacate anything and everything that involved ineligible players.
Present - fine the living **** out of them by making them repay all the $'s they have been given from anything that was associated with the vacated games (tourney money, bowl money, TV money, etc., etc.). UNC takes out a full page ad in USA Today and the 5 largest in state newspaper publications apologizing to the student athletes that were wronged, the NCAA, the ACC, all other colleges they competed against, and the state of North Carolina.
Future - 5 years of post season bans so they can snivel and cry their *** off after the second year to get it reduced to 3. Massive and debilitating scholarship reductions for a period of at least 5 years. 10 year period where UNC pays an outside and independent firm (selected by the NCAA) to oversee and perform random unannounced audits of how their SA's and academics coexist.
I didn't include TV ban on the "future" because of TV contracts in place for conference games and the like. But the big reason to me for no TV ban is that the post season bans and scholly losses should ensure they suck out loud for a minimum of 6 years and I want to be able to watch them get hammered time and time and time again in the comfort of my den while I LOL.
There's an important admission embedded in that defense: UNC isn't claiming that athletes were actively seeking out fake classes. UNC is implying that there was pre-existing fraud independent of the athletes, who merely "didn't resist" being sucked into it.
They're also implying that the fraud was so blatant that even naive freshman students should've known what was going on and either avoided it or reported it.
SACS formally called B.S. on UNC's assertion that the AFAM scandal was the work of simply two people.
I remember that; but it seems to continue to be perpetuated in the few articles we see on it
I am sure that most athletes that are involved when improprieties happen know something is amiss. Did that ever stop the NCAA from sanctions before? As the KSR caller JT says "If the NCAA was a man I would punch it in the face". :boxing:
Latest
-
01
KSR Football
Shane Beamer Pleads with South Carolina Fans Ahead of Kentucky Game
-
02
KSR
KSR Today: One step closer to a Sandstorm
-
03
KSR Football
Will Stein and Shane Beamer's Relationship Comes Full Circle on Saturday
-
04
KSR Football
Will Stein Downplays Kentucky's AP Top 25 Ranking, Dylan Stewart's Absence
-
05
KSR Basketball Recruiting
5-star PG Reese Alston completes official visit to Kentucky