Jesus wasn’t a god. And he wasn’t the god of the Bible. He was an apocalyptic preacher who had “godhood” bestowed upon him after he died.
If you’ve met one claim-to-be-a-prophet, you’ve met them all.
Jesus wasn’t a god. And he wasn’t the god of the Bible. He was an apocalyptic preacher who had “godhood” bestowed upon him after he died.
Jesus told the religious authorities that He and the Father are "one" which is why He was crucified.
According to Christianity, Jesus is the 3rd person of the Trinity and is therefore God.
You are free to disagree, of course.
You’re good. Hell doesn’t exist, either. It certainly isn’t Biblical. Hell (Hades) was added in as more Greeks and believers in their gods joined Christianity and brought their beliefs into the fold.It is illogical to say God is “all powerful, all knowing and all benevolent”. Those three conditions cannot literally be true at the same time in a world filled with strife.
I’m a Christian and I believe there is a higher power, but I highly doubt those three conditions are true. One or more of them is simply off. But I also don’t think the Bible is meant to be taken literally. I don’t believe the world was created in 7 days or that Noah‘s boat was the only thing to survive a global flood.
I believe in Christ’s message and try my best to walk in his footsteps. When I sin I try to atone for it as best I can. So if I end up in hell because I think God isn‘t all powerful, all knowing and benevolent … well so be it. I did my best.
In that situation God would have to be a pretty narcissistic a$$hole.
You’re good. Hell doesn’t exist, either. It certainly isn’t Biblical. Hell (Hades) was added in as more Greeks and believers in their gods joined Christianity and brought their beliefs into the fold.
And, for the record, he was crucified for claiming he was the king of the Jews. The charge was put on the cross to mock him.For the record. I disagree.
And, for the record, he wasn’t crucified for claiming he was the king of the Jews. The charge was put on the cross to mock him.
Zeus was a little fuckboi. If He created man in His image, then I’m inclined to think Zeus is more real.Jesus is the Christian God and He is more real than Zeus the myth.
C'mon, brah.
You should know this.
The Jewish Pharasees accused him of claiming to be the Messiah/king. Pilate's question was essentially, "Are you the king of the Jews?" Jesus didn’t exactly deny it either. So sure, the sign was intended to mock him, but the claim that led to the crucifixion was absolutely tied to his claim of kingship.And, for the record, he wasn’t crucified for claiming he was the king of the Jews. The charge was put on the cross to mock him.
I agree God of the Gaps, so to speak, isn't difinitive, but it is thought provoking, no? But that's not really what I'm arguing. I'm asking a more fundamental question, why is there something rather than nothing? Science is incredibly good at explaining how the universe works, but IMO "how does it work?" isn't necessarily the same question as why does anything exist at all? I don't claim science proves God. I just don't think "science hasn't demonstrated God" is the same as demonstratng there is no rational basis for believing in one.Never denied it.![]()
Problem is there's not one of those that requires a creator. It's all philosophical and the philosophy - such as it is - is that what we don't yet understand is somehow evidence that some god is responsible. That god was responsible for lightning and earthquakes and stars moving and fire and everything else at some point. That god has gotten smaller and smaller and smaller. That's why I'm willing to concede the possibility of a creator who set everything in motion but has no impact on the workings of that creation. That's the only god that science can't touch.
No he didn't. The term is never mentioned. Sheol is not Hell. Gehenna is not Hell. Burning bodies in fire is not Hell. Leaving bodies in the grave in darkness is not Hell. What IS Hell? Hades' underworld...Jesus preached on Hell dozens of times in the Bible.
![]()
Jesus Said More about Hell Than Anyone in the Bible
The word wrath is important for understanding what Jesus meant by hell. Hell is not simply the natural consequence of rejecting God.www.crossway.org
No he didn't. The term is never mentioned. Sheol is not Hell. Gehenna is not Hell. Burning bodies in fire is not Hell. Leaving bodies in the grave in darkness is not Hell. What IS Hell? Hades' underworld...
Jesus taught that he would return and preside over a paradise right here on Earth. The righteous dead would be resurrected and live there. Those who were alive when it happened would never know death. Those who weren't worthy would stay dead or die and stay dead forever. And he said it would happen in the time of the generation currently living.
For Jews, the timeline was horizontal. A time of misery and life -> apocalypse -> Eden on Earth for the righteous and everlasting death for the unworthy. It was the Greek vertical view that took over Christianity. Gods above and the underworld below.
The Jews had no concept of a Heaven above or a Hell below... they didn't really have a concept of the soul as being distinct from the body. Souls weren't rasied from the grave...people were. The entire idea of a postmortem judgement of souls that had left their bodies to be sorted based on good and evil came from the Greek tradition. It predates Christianity by centuries and was woven into the Bible as it was translated. Into Greek.
I’m mostly motivated by the values of Christ. I think those lessons are the best way for humanity to conduct ourselves. I also believe there is a high probability of an intelligence in the universe far above ours (that for all intents and purposes would appear to be God like).Gotta be honest, I thought you were above the god thing. Are you more in it from an everlasting-life-I-need-to-believe-there’s-more insurance perspective or a true believer?
That is how I see it. I don’t believe we are damned just because we didn’t say some words in the right way. I am much more interested in living my life according to the lessons in the sermon on the Mount (although I fail often).You’re good. Hell doesn’t exist, either. It certainly isn’t Biblical. Hell (Hades) was added in as more Greeks and believers in their gods joined Christianity and brought their beliefs into the fold.
All that "messiah" means is that he claimed he was a divinely appointed king - not that he was God. That is the quite literal translation of the word. Any divinity he would have would flow from that. And, obviously, it was blasphemous to make that claim. Hence, that is the charge that was recorded on the cross.The Jewish Pharasees accused him of claiming to be the Messiah/king. Pilate's question was essentially, "Are you the king of the Jews?" Jesus didn’t exactly deny it either. So sure, the sign was intended to mock him, but the claim that led to the crucifixion was absolutely tied to his claim of kingship.
Mark 14:61–64: The high priest asks Jesus if he is the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One. Jesus answers affirmatively and speaks of the Son of Man at God's right hand. The high priest tears his clothes and says, "You have heard his blasphemy." They condemn him as deserving death.
John 10:30–33: Jesus says, "I and the Father are one." The Jews pick up stones. When Jesus asks why, they answer: "because you, being a man, make yourself God."
I agree God of the Gaps, so to speak, isn't difinitive, but it is thought provoking, no? But that's not really what I'm arguing. I'm asking a more fundamental question, why is there something rather than nothing? Science is incredibly good at explaining how the universe works, but IMO "how does it work?" isn't necessarily the same question as why does anything exist at all? I don't claim science proves God. I just don't think "science hasn't demonstrated God" is the same as demonstratng there is no rational basis for believing in one.
I have no problem with metaphors. The entire book is metaphors. What you can't do is claim "this was a metaphor but that one is spot-on truth". That's just you imposing your own beliefs.Jesus used metaphors to describe Hell in a way that humans could understand like Gehenna.
Many saints and even atheists have experienced Hell.
Then refute the points made.You should stop reading Bart Ehrman...he's not that great of a scholar.![]()
Here's ex-atheist college professor Howard Storm.
You're more than welcome. You're also more than welcome to tell your fellow Christians toThanks for your perspective.
My standard is "I am sorry for your loss."When someone passes, I never know what to say so I just say that I'm sorry. It makes me feel uncomfortable. I'm afraid to say something that might offend when I don't mean to.
I'm hurt my mid 40's and haven't hit that with my friends yet, but I am guessing it will start soon and when the dam breaks, it will flood.It's difficult. Now that I'm in my mid 30s, I've started having more and more friends whose parents have passed away.
I dont say a ton until they're ready to talk, and then I give my experience and what helped me get through it. I just try and help how I can.
For close friends or family I sometimes skip straight to "I am here for whatever I can do for you."
Navigating your own grief is hard enough, navigating someone else's is impossible.
This. Why choose to believe in a petty, vengeful god?I’m mostly motivated by the values of Christ. I think those lessons are the best way for humanity to conduct ourselves. I also believe there is a high probability of an intelligence in the universe far above ours (that for all intents and purposes would appear to be God like).
I am not motivated at all by hellfire and brimstone BS. So while I call myself a Christian, many Christians would say I am not one. I don’t really care what they think.
Bingo.That is how I see it. I don’t believe we are damned just because we didn’t say some words in the right way. I am much more interested in living my life according to the lessons in the sermon on the Mount (although I fail often).
Well stated. Very, very well stated.For close friends or family I sometimes skip straight to "I am here for whatever I can do for you."
Navigating your own grief is hard enough, navigating someone else's is impossible.
It will, and it'll suck. Just gotta do what it is you (we) can do to help and be supportive of others.I'm hurt my mid 40's and haven't hit that with my friends yet, but I am guessing it will start soon and when the dam breaks, it will flood.
Heaven in the Bible:It's probably fair to say that at least some concept of heaven is reflected in the Bible.
No Heaven above. No Hell below. No souls independent of the bodies they inhabit. The wicked die and their bodies are burned rather than being buried. The righteous live on an Eden/Earth forever. No concept of eternal torment... the wicked just stay dead and miss out on the good stuff. Everything beyond that came from the Greek myths.
It's in the Bible. My question would be why you choose to believe the imported Greek myths that were never part of early Christianity?You post with supreme confidence...are you 100% certain that you're right about life after death?
It's in the Bible. My question would be why you choose to believe the imported Greek myths that were never part of early Christianity?
Nah... never mind. You're not 100% certain, either. If you're citing Pascal's Wager, be aware that it demonstrates not one thing about the existence of a Christian god. The same wager could be stated for ANY religion. Are you covering all of your bases?
You have the right to believe anything you like as long as you don't try to force it on anyone else. And when someone - as in the OP - credits their god for surviving a bear attack, I'm going to point out the fallacy of that claim.
*sigh* He never said he would “take humans to Heaven”. Heaven would be right here on Earth. Jesus was supposed to come down to Earth to rule over it. The righteous would be resurrected and live in that Heaven. Right here. They wouldn’t be disembodied souls - they would be themselves perfected.Because Jesus said we should build our treasures in Heaven and not in this world.
I've studied many religions and philosophies and Jesus is the only religious figure that says He will take humans to Heaven. That's unique.
Also, since you brought up Pascal, you should read his writings because he did write 200 pages about why Christianity is the one true religion.
*sigh* He never said he would “take humans to Heaven”. Heaven would be right here on Earth. Jesus was supposed to come down to Earth to rule over it. The righteous would be resurrected and live in that Heaven. Right here. They wouldn’t be disembodied souls - they would be themselves perfected.
The Greeks thought that was nuts. Who would want to be stuck in a creaky old human body for eternity? THEY had already developed the idea of souls hundreds of years before Jesus … of an upper realm of the gods… a lower realm of punishment. They just brought that over when they converted. Plato wrote hundreds of pages on that so maybe you actually worship Zeus without knowing it.![]()
Like I've said, you're free to believe whatever you like. Recognize they are your beliefs and, quite literally, yours alone. Avoid the hypocrisy - as in the op - of claiming YOU are favored by your god over others in the same situation. I'm fine with that.I do think that the Earth will turn into a type of paradise...that may not be that far off.
Like I've said, you're free to believe whatever you like. Recognize they are your beliefs and, quite literally, yours alone. Avoid the hypocrisy - as in the op - of claiming YOU are favored by your god over others in the same situation. I'm fine with that.
No, they don't. Not one of them. Every single person constructs their own reality from the Bible and every one of them diverges from the next in some way. Claiming you have billions of people in lockstep simply because they claim to be Christians is laughable. Are you a Christian nationalist? They are among those billions. Are you a Mormon? They are Christians. You can't even make that claim for the Catholic Church. Are there Catholics that claim the Mass must be in Latin? Heck, there are Catholics that support female clergy... birth control... who believe that Adam and Eve is literal history and the Earth is no more than 10,000 years old.Billions of people believe what I believe...it's hardly unique to me. I don't believe I'm favored.
Have a nice Labor Day weekend.
No, they don't. Not one of them. Every single person constructs their own reality from the Bible and every one of them diverges from the next in some way. Claiming you have billions of people in lockstep simply because they claim to be Christians is laughable. Are you a Christian nationalist? They are among those billions. Are you a Mormon? They are Christians. You can't even make that claim for the Catholic Church. Are there Catholics that claim the Mass must be in Latin? Heck, there are Catholics that support female clergy... birth control... who believe that Adam and Eve is literal history and the Earth is no more than 10,000 years old.
No problem with Tommy. He valued reason. He just employed it very ineffectively. And, unfortunately for you, his arguments are strictly deist in nature. They contain zero evidence for the Christian god.
LOL... those are Biblically based arguments. There is absolutely zero evidence for a "Trinity" absent the Bible and there isn't much even with it. And his "six days" are presented differently in the Bible itself.Oh wow.
Did you read the Summa?
You didn't read "Pensees" by Pascal and strawmanned his arguments.
Also, the video I linked showed you what he experienced personally and why he stopped writing.
You should read the texts.
SUMMA THEOLOGIAE: Home
St. Thomas Aquinas' entire masterpiece, in an easy-to-use formatwww.newadvent.org
LOL... those are Biblically based arguments. There is absolutely zero evidence for a "Trinity" absent the Bible and there isn't much even with it.
What he "experienced personally" falls under the purview of anecdote and, as such, is useless as proof of anything.
He can argue until he's blue in the face. I can argue incessantly for leprechauns. He presents precisely zero evidence for the existence of the god of the Bible without invoking the Bible.Again, you should read the text...he spends hundreds of pages arguing for Jesus, the sacraments, etc. which disproved your claim that he was only arguing for deism.
He can argue until he's blue in the face. I can argue incessantly for leprechauns. He presents precisely zero evidence for the existence of the god of the Bible without invoking the Bible.
Tiger Illustrated Football
What is Clemson's offense equipped to do vs. No. 4 Miami?
Tiger Illustrated Football
Wednesday Clemson Football & Recruiting Insider
Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting
Wednesday Clemson Football Recruiting Nuggets
Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting
Behind recent Clemson vs. Miami recruiting battles
Tiger Illustrated Football
An object of intrigue within Clemson's defense moving forward