You just took a page out of the Liberal playbook. Just can't help yourself. I only answered your original reply. I said they've been duped for decades, but so have a lot of other Americans, but that's not what you brought up. I can't prove he's racist, no. But I believe he was. A lot of white liberals are. They live in ivory towers, but hey, they don't like poor white people either.
Donald Trump has been known for racist ideology and behavior since his days as a private citizen: housing discrimination, the Central Park 5, the birther conspiracy, immigration rhetoric, slandering & dismantling DEI, increased hate crimes against BIPOC and other historically marginalized communities. There are reasons. I'll ask again: what's the evidence of racism against Biden?
There's no playbook. And saying there is doesn't actually address anything. It's a cheap, lazy form of condescension.
Gentlemen, that quivering that you’re feeling is good ol Datt. He’s about to blow, and be on a one/two week break.
You bore me. You can't keep up so you do this weak cosplay of how you think a smart person behaves. It's more than just a condescending tone and fake mind-reading, mac. You actually have to bring some substance other than your eye test.
Known for racist ideology- yeah that’s very specific. lol
He doesn’t have Trump’s record, but Biden’s isn’t pristine. Not many in the public eye for four decades exit unscathed, however. As Kamala astutely pointed out during the Primaries, opposition to federal busing, and even worse spearheading legislation in 94 that led to mass incarceration of African American disproportionately, even worse than the status quo. Had to do with disparate sentencing of crack possession as opposed to powder cocaine iirc. Many leading civil rights advocates at the time thought that the distinction was a dog whistle of sorts since crack was attached to Black violence of the time and white doctors strung out on powder seldom robbed liquor stores, but that perception that he was a racist in some quarters lingered until things were smoothed over for the sake of the party in 08.
More propaganda you've bought from the media. One would have thought that a lot of what we've seen the last 5-6 years would make you question what you've been told.
The 2 words "racist ideology," taken together as a single linguistic construct, is not remotely specific... which is why I followed it with a list. How did you miss that?
We don't see things the same. We can watch all day, side-by-side, and still not agree.
Hang on, now...
If you feel Biden "didn't" lead the country, great, thats cool....but if so, at least he had people in place that were able to effectively keep things together....now you probably gonna disagree with the effectively keep things together part, but were people in high positions behaving and doing things we seeing now???
An estimated 300-400 k children were “misplaced” during the Biden years. No follow-up, no contact with a sponsor. The polar opposite of compassion.
That, despite your presentation of a laundry list of opinions as somehow proof of evidence, my own research has led me to believe that there’s some merit to your claims. I also contend that your rosy assessment of DEI practices misses the mark, that there were already anti discriminatory laws in place to fill that niche, that in practice DEI measures have resulted in quotas that lead to reverse discrimation against whites and Asians. Yet while I also recognize that anti DEI rhetoric can be and is used as a racist dog whistle, that doesn’t mean that the program should be insulated from all criticism if it leads to civil rights violations stemming from quotas
I’m gonna address the part in the border first. On the surface, what you’re saying sounds ok. But it doesn’t tell the truth at all. Of course, the outlets you watch didn’t say what I’m about to. Yeah tne migrants did take advantage of crossing the border because the “Biden” administration didn’t enforce it. And did you know that (according to the outlets I watched) there was no rapid dna testing done? This was available, but they chose not to do this. It only took 90 seconds, and verified whether the people coming in were relatives. Sounds like a no brainer to me. But no.
www.bbc.com
Grothman, National Security Subcommittee Members Investigate Human Trafficking Risks as Biden Administration Moves to End DNA Testing at the Border - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reformoversight.house.gov
@BOOGIEMAN1914 Is this information sparkling enough?
It wasn’t just “on the way here”. Among other things a legal sponsor of an unaccompanied minor must pass a background check and ensure that the minor attends future court hearings. We’ve already established that there was virtually no vetting of sponsors from 2021-2024 and most minors never received a court date. Why is the court date important? This allows the sponsor to present a care plan and update the judge as to the child’s welfare. A sponsor is typically an immediate or extended family member, but this requires dna testing for obvious reasons. An unrelated adult can also apply for sponsorship, but in these cases vetting is even more urgent to prevent exploitation at best, abuse at worst. Some, impossible to know how many, minors are teenage boys working for the cartel. 100% there are human trafficking risks when our fed govt abdicates its border.
apnews.com
The Democratic governor of NJ announced that 6,600 people were accidentally registered due to a software glitch and that around 400 of them cast ballots in at least one election. 400. The glitch started in 2023 and was addressed beginning in 2024.
I acknowledge the sloppiness around ensuring the safety of unaccompanied minors.
You can twist anything around to fit your agenda. You’ve been brainwashed, which is sad considering your vocabulary. DEI sounds good, but there’s a helluva lot of people sitting in positions that don’t deserve to be based on their race. I’ve witnessed this at NCDPI. How is questioning anyone’s citizenship racist? I’m not racist, but I am prejudice.
You want stats on evidence of trafficking? This is rich, especially coming from the side that dismissed the movie “Sound of Freedom.”
“Sloppiness”? Good one. Shockingly cavalier when you consider what we’re dealing with here. An admin that passes legislation early in his term to “ fight human trafficking” and then proceeds for the next four years to dismantle border security and sponsor protocols, all but ensuring that children are exploited, trafficked, and/ or enslaved.
“Lax border security, in conjunction with nonexistent interior enforcement, has created a fertile environment for human trafficking”
