I’m having a hard time believing that you guys are buying that he was killed with a .30-06. The story as given makes no sense. But people bought the wet market crap as the origin of Covid for a year, so I guess we aren’t there yet.
I didn’t say that. I said he was not shot with.a .30-06. I don’t claim to know what happened, but it wasn’t that. I suspect it’s more than a simple “you’ve got the wrong guy” thing, but I don’t know. A plausible story would have been nice. Will it get to trial is the question.
The defense is correctly noting the inconclusive bullet fragment result and using it to argue for more scrutiny or to plant doubt. However, treating that single inconclusive finding as proof the bullet “didn’t match” the rifle—or as a major hole in the case—misrepresents how ballistics forensics works. Damaged bullet fragments frequently yield inconclusive results without ruling out the weapon, especially when the cartridge case does match and the rest of the evidence (DNA, confessions, recovery of the rifle, etc.) aligns.This is a standard defense approach in high-stakes cases: emphasize weaknesses in one area of forensics while the totality of evidence remains strong. The inconclusive bullet result is explainable by the physics of the wound and ammunition type; it does not contradict the positive casing match or other links to the rifle and suspect.
That's not it at all. It's what a .30-06 would do, not the fragments. His neck wouldn't stop a .30-06.The defense is correctly noting the inconclusive bullet fragment result and using it to argue for more scrutiny or to plant doubt. However, treating that single inconclusive finding as proof the bullet “didn’t match” the rifle—or as a major hole in the case—misrepresents how ballistics forensics works. Damaged bullet fragments frequently yield inconclusive results without ruling out the weapon, especially when the cartridge case does match and the rest of the evidence (DNA, confessions, recovery of the rifle, etc.) aligns.This is a standard defense approach in high-stakes cases: emphasize weaknesses in one area of forensics while the totality of evidence remains strong. The inconclusive bullet result is explainable by the physics of the wound and ammunition type; it does not contradict the positive casing match or other links to the rifle and suspect.
Some background here:
Why the Bullet Fragment Was Damaged and InconclusiveKirk was shot in the neck with what appears to have been a soft-point hunting round (e.g., .30-06 Remington Core-Lokt type, consistent with the rifle and recovered fragments). These bullets are designed to expand and transfer energy inside the target rather than pass through cleanly. When they strike dense structures like bone or vertebrae:
This is a well-known limitation in ballistics. A neck shot increasing the chance of bone impact makes an inconclusive bullet result scientifically expected, not suspicious.
- They deform, mushroom, and fragment.
- Fine microscopic striations on the jacket are destroyed or obscured.
- Only a deformed jacket fragment and lead pieces were recovered from the autopsy (lead fragments were unsuitable for comparison).
The bullet fragment comparison is only one narrow piece of forensic evidence. The overall case against Robinson includes:
- DNA consistent with Robinson on the rifle trigger, other rifle parts, the fired cartridge casing, unfired cartridges, and the towel it was wrapped in.
- Confessions: Texts to his roommate/partner admitting “I am” the shooter and citing motive (“I had enough of his hatred”); a note left under a keyboard stating he took the opportunity to kill Kirk.
- Physical/recovered evidence: The rifle (grandfather’s Mauser 98 .30-06) found nearby, engraved casings with memes (“Hey fascist! Catch!”, etc.) linked to a Dremel tool associated with Robinson, test-fired casings matching the rifle, surveillance/video placing a person consistent with Robinson on the rooftop.
- Other: Class characteristics of the bullet fragments consistent with the rifle; the rifle was operable and test-fired.
You may want to stay away from online conspiracies. This kid did it and will be guilty either through plea or conviction. It was his leftwing disagreements with Charlie Kirk that motivated him. You were duped. It happens
The problem here is you are outsourcing your brain and common sense to a LLM.The defense is correctly noting the inconclusive bullet fragment result and using it to argue for more scrutiny or to plant doubt. However, treating that single inconclusive finding as proof the bullet “didn’t match” the rifle—or as a major hole in the case—misrepresents how ballistics forensics works. Damaged bullet fragments frequently yield inconclusive results without ruling out the weapon, especially when the cartridge case does match and the rest of the evidence (DNA, confessions, recovery of the rifle, etc.) aligns.This is a standard defense approach in high-stakes cases: emphasize weaknesses in one area of forensics while the totality of evidence remains strong. The inconclusive bullet result is explainable by the physics of the wound and ammunition type; it does not contradict the positive casing match or other links to the rifle and suspect.
Some background here:
Why the Bullet Fragment Was Damaged and InconclusiveKirk was shot in the neck with what appears to have been a soft-point hunting round (e.g., .30-06 Remington Core-Lokt type, consistent with the rifle and recovered fragments). These bullets are designed to expand and transfer energy inside the target rather than pass through cleanly. When they strike dense structures like bone or vertebrae:
This is a well-known limitation in ballistics. A neck shot increasing the chance of bone impact makes an inconclusive bullet result scientifically expected, not suspicious.
- They deform, mushroom, and fragment.
- Fine microscopic striations on the jacket are destroyed or obscured.
- Only a deformed jacket fragment and lead pieces were recovered from the autopsy (lead fragments were unsuitable for comparison).
The bullet fragment comparison is only one narrow piece of forensic evidence. The overall case against Robinson includes:
- DNA consistent with Robinson on the rifle trigger, other rifle parts, the fired cartridge casing, unfired cartridges, and the towel it was wrapped in.
- Confessions: Texts to his roommate/partner admitting “I am” the shooter and citing motive (“I had enough of his hatred”); a note left under a keyboard stating he took the opportunity to kill Kirk.
- Physical/recovered evidence: The rifle (grandfather’s Mauser 98 .30-06) found nearby, engraved casings with memes (“Hey fascist! Catch!”, etc.) linked to a Dremel tool associated with Robinson, test-fired casings matching the rifle, surveillance/video placing a person consistent with Robinson on the rooftop.
- Other: Class characteristics of the bullet fragments consistent with the rifle; the rifle was operable and test-fired.
You may want to stay away from online conspiracies. This kid did it and will be guilty either through plea or conviction. It was his leftwing disagreements with Charlie Kirk that motivated him. You were duped. It happens
It's ok to be wrong. There are tons of crazy theories being spun online through both sides on this one. The knucklehead in custody did it.
I guess you are all assuming the weapon is the .30-06 because nobody is addressing that. The wound is not matching the weapon. Pretty simple really.
I don’t believe the current story about him assembling, taking down, then reassembling the rifle before ditching it. No.
Just quoting from any quotes you look up and post here are usually incomplete, as is this plagiarism item.The defense is correctly noting the inconclusive bullet fragment result and using it to argue for more scrutiny or to plant doubt. However, treating that single inconclusive finding as proof the bullet “didn’t match” the rifle—or as a major hole in the case—misrepresents how ballistics forensics works. Damaged bullet fragments frequently yield inconclusive results without ruling out the weapon, especially when the cartridge case does match and the rest of the evidence (DNA, confessions, recovery of the rifle, etc.) aligns.This is a standard defense approach in high-stakes cases: emphasize weaknesses in one area of forensics while the totality of evidence remains strong. The inconclusive bullet result is explainable by the physics of the wound and ammunition type; it does not contradict the positive casing match or other links to the rifle and suspect.
Some background here:
Why the Bullet Fragment Was Damaged and InconclusiveKirk was shot in the neck with what appears to have been a soft-point hunting round (e.g., .30-06 Remington Core-Lokt type, consistent with the rifle and recovered fragments). These bullets are designed to expand and transfer energy inside the target rather than pass through cleanly. When they strike dense structures like bone or vertebrae:
This is a well-known limitation in ballistics. A neck shot increasing the chance of bone impact makes an inconclusive bullet result scientifically expected, not suspicious.
- They deform, mushroom, and fragment.
- Fine microscopic striations on the jacket are destroyed or obscured.
- Only a deformed jacket fragment and lead pieces were recovered from the autopsy (lead fragments were unsuitable for comparison).
The bullet fragment comparison is only one narrow piece of forensic evidence. The overall case against Robinson includes:
- DNA consistent with Robinson on the rifle trigger, other rifle parts, the fired cartridge casing, unfired cartridges, and the towel it was wrapped in.
- Confessions: Texts to his roommate/partner admitting “I am” the shooter and citing motive (“I had enough of his hatred”); a note left under a keyboard stating he took the opportunity to kill Kirk.
- Physical/recovered evidence: The rifle (grandfather’s Mauser 98 .30-06) found nearby, engraved casings with memes (“Hey fascist! Catch!”, etc.) linked to a Dremel tool associated with Robinson, test-fired casings matching the rifle, surveillance/video placing a person consistent with Robinson on the rooftop.
- Other: Class characteristics of the bullet fragments consistent with the rifle; the rifle was operable and test-fired.
You may want to stay away from online conspiracies. This kid did it and will be guilty either through plea or conviction. It was his leftwing disagreements with Charlie Kirk that motivated him. You were duped. It happens
There is really no big deal of disassembly or assembling a simple firearm.
The Gen Xers here should get a chuckle out of this one. I’ve got Paradise by the Dashboard Light running through my head now.
www.foxnews.com
Great job. This wasn’t a Garand. It was a scoped 30-06. Per usual who gives a flying ****.
The wildfires negatively impact US citizens. As an example, many youth sporting events get canceled due to the poor quality of air. This isn’t in the same Trump realm where he picked a fight with the mayor of London his first as in.Does this apply to Colorado polluting Arizona
Seriously, I think Trump has bigger fish to fry but he works 18 hours a day so way more energetic than me. He always is negotiating, it is his personality, but I'm not sure he doesn't push it too far sometimes. What is Canada supposed to do?
ps. it is raining in Phoenix this week.
Trump blames Canada for wildfire smoke, says pollution costs should be added to tariffs
Trump accused Canada of "willful negligence" in forest management and suggested pollution costs should be added to tariffs on Canadian imports.
It would be wise to get used to most people using subscription AI for information to help build ideas and analysis, emails,presentantions,etc. It is not plagiarism. Welcome to 2026, BW
!Does this apply to Colorado polluting Arizona
Seriously, I think Trump has bigger fish to fry but he works 18 hours a day so way more energetic than me. He always is negotiating, it is his personality, but I'm not sure he doesn't push it too far sometimes. What is Canada supposed to do?
ps. it is raining in Phoenix this week.
Trump blames Canada for wildfire smoke, says pollution costs should be added to tariffs
Trump accused Canada of "willful negligence" in forest management and suggested pollution costs should be added to tariffs on Canadian imports.
Did you or someone/something else produce product ?It would be wise to get used to most people using subscription AI for information to help build ideas and analysis, emails,presentantions,etc. It is not plagiarism. Welcome to 2026, BW
Like Joey in Syracuse Law School and his "papers".I believe this is on the Colorado River. I am not sure if this means much regarding the ongoing debate of water here and am too lazy to AI it for BW.
Ask your LLM who won the 2020 election and who was responsible for Jan. 6th.It would be wise to get used to most people using subscription AI for information to help build ideas and analysis, emails,presentantions,etc. It is not plagiarism. Welcome to 2026, BW
Our youngest never sends an email or even a message in his work day without using AI. So, he needs to cite his AI source every time? My wife uses it in her job all day for presentations, inter-office memos, etc. All Day long. Everyday she works. She works for a top 100 US company and they push all of their employees to use and get more skilled using AI for everything. If you don't, you will be less valued.
