roster update with incoming freshmen

PinkShizzle

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2025
1,794
4,043
113
Whitters 6'3 329
Nielsen 6'7 311
Parliment 6'4 313
Riorden 6'5 302
Linder 6'6 294

Anyone know if they all project into a starting 5, as in, two are projected to be tackles, two guards, and a center?
 

hawkeyemark18

Senior
Aug 16, 2019
295
517
93
Some big boys in this freshman (sorry 1st year class). Withers 6'3 329, Nielsen 6'7 311, Parliment 6'4 313, Riorden 6'5 302
I like the size too. As to classification I think we will still use freshman through senior. When they get to that fifth year we will refer to the players as fifth year seniors just like we always have with players who took a redshirt year. The new rule just throws redshirt out the window.
 

Kceasthawk@77

All-American
Feb 2, 2005
2,933
5,336
113
I like the size too. As to classification I think we will still use freshman through senior. When they get to that fifth year we will refer to the players as fifth year seniors just like we always have with players who took a redshirt year. The new rule just throws redshirt out the window.
Just going by the roster in the link. players are now listed (on the Iowa website) as 1st, year, 2nd year etc.. Its obvious the "class" they are in school no longer has any effect on how the program classifies them. You are 1st year thru 5th year player now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PinkShizzle

hawkeyemark18

Senior
Aug 16, 2019
295
517
93
Just going by the roster in the link. players are now listed (on the Iowa website) as 1st, year, 2nd year etc.. Its obvious the "class" they are in school no longer has any effect on how the program classifies them. You are 1st year thru 5th year player now.
Thanks for the update as as I haven't looked at the roster. I thought freshman through fifth year senior seemed simpler. But I can get used to the new way of classification. I do like the five to play five rule much better and it seems so much more sensible.
 

Ripcord

Junior
Aug 30, 2016
242
314
63
I am salivating at the thoughts of our running backs and tight ends this season. on quarterbacks, not so much.
 

WeBeHerkin

All-American
Aug 5, 2016
4,480
5,135
113
Maybe the coaches or Phillips himself wanted him faster? Being only 5'8" and 211 is still very stout.
If you remember, they jumped on Wadley I believe for being too light? Needed more weight to be more durable. I may be misremembering the player, but I believe that was Wadley.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KurtWarner

BigOHawk1

Senior
Oct 27, 2001
474
891
93
If you remember, they jumped on Wadley I believe for being too light? Needed more weight to be more durable. I may be misremembering the player, but I believe that was Wadley.
Oh 100% it was...never heard them bag on a single player for weight...maybe it was all true and needed, maybe not..yet it was a bit creepy how much the media and interviews around this topic was. After the NW game in 2015, remember he had that huge rushing day and KF was interviewed after game and instead of giving some quick praise, etc, he gave backhanded compliments, etc....Now, knowing what we now know perhaps it was justified and sending a message but a bit cringe at the time...
 

Kceasthawk@77

All-American
Feb 2, 2005
2,933
5,336
113
If you remember, they jumped on Wadley I believe for being too light? Needed more weight to be more durable. I may be misremembering the player, but I believe that was Wadley.
Not sure the correlation. First off Wadley came in around 165-170. That was too light to play RB in the B1G. Phillips weighed about 220+ last year, so not the same thing. The big deal with Wadley was MUCH deeper then just his weight. Each player on the team was given a target weight and a personalized training AND nutrition program customized specifically for them. The problem Kirk and the staff had with Wadley was he wasn't meeting either his training or nutrition goals for first 1 1/2 years. They felt he wasn't serious enough about trying to reach the goals that were being set for him. This led to his limited playing time. I guess some of that could be construed as punishment, and some as looking out for him not giving him the work load until he was more physically prepared.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PinkShizzle

Kceasthawk@77

All-American
Feb 2, 2005
2,933
5,336
113
Oh 100% it was...never heard them bag on a single player for weight...maybe it was all true and needed, maybe not..yet it was a bit creepy how much the media and interviews around this topic was. After the NW game in 2015, remember he had that huge rushing day and KF was interviewed after game and instead of giving some quick praise, etc, he gave backhanded compliments, etc....Now, knowing what we now know perhaps it was justified and sending a message but a bit cringe at the time...
Read my post after yours. There were reasons he was held back.
 

WeBeHerkin

All-American
Aug 5, 2016
4,480
5,135
113
Not sure the correlation. First off Wadley came in around 165-170. That was too light to play RB in the B1G. Phillips weighed about 220+ last year, so not the same thing. The big deal with Wadley was MUCH deeper then just his weight. Each player was given a target weight and a personalized training AND nutrition program customized specifically for them. The problem Kirk and the staff had with Wadley was he wasn't meeting either his training or nutrition goals for first 1 1/2 years. They felt he wasn't serious enough about trying to reach the goals that were being set for him. This led to his limited playing time. I guess some of that could be construed as punishment, and some as looking out for him not giving him the work load until he was more physically prepared.
Mine was a joke. Don't take so seriously. I threw the Brian in there.
 

Kceasthawk@77

All-American
Feb 2, 2005
2,933
5,336
113
Mine was a joke. Don't take so seriously. I threw the Brian in there.
I read post #29. It doesn't say anything about Brian. I'm not being "overly serious". There are still posters here who think the guy was treated badly. That's not the case. Just putting some facts into the conversation. or is that not allowed? Just the jokes I guess.....
 

PinkShizzle

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2025
1,794
4,043
113
If you remember, they jumped on Wadley I believe for being too light? Needed more weight to be more durable. I may be misremembering the player, but I believe that was Wadley.
It was Wadley, but Wadley was also three inches taller and didn't even get to 190 lbs until his fourth year in the program.

Phillips came in at 225.

Edit: just saw you were joking a bit.
 

Roncuba65

All-Conference
Aug 15, 2022
1,178
1,950
113
No steroids or HGH, I'm sure. Just the natural development of a kid who eats right and works hard.
Gtfo of here with that nonsense! if you aren't being a whiney liberal nutjob, you are making ridiculous baseless accusations against your own "team"... Go take your medicine!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85Bears

PinkShizzle

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2025
1,794
4,043
113
This isn't Nebraska of the 80s and 90s... these guys get tested regularly. Chris Doyle is probably the greatest S&C coach of all-time, Iowa has his blueprint.
I know those things. I'm just saying, athletes find ways. I had classes with athletes when in grad school and this discussion came up. They all said you generally have to screw up pretty bad to get caught and are even given a timetable for when you get tested.

I was not the one that brought up PEDs or made accusation. It just wouldn't surprise me if some athletes were to use them.