You are surprised someone involved with soccer would be a whiny beach?I’m kinda surprised they’re being such whiny beaches about this.
You are surprised someone involved with soccer would be a whiny beach?I’m kinda surprised they’re being such whiny beaches about this.
Actually, this is unquestionably the correct ruling on their appeal. They're not a party to it.LOL! They don’t want to have to explain it do they. This really is can of worms for them.
Letter of the law, sure. But this is only going to increase the uproar. UEFA has condemned the suspended suspension, and the appearance of political interference. What a mess all the way around.Actually, this is unquestionably the correct ruling on their appeal. They're not a party to it.
At the end of the day, even though FIFA screwed this up in virtually every way possible (no call on field when it probably should have at least been a foul if not a yellow, improper use of slow motion in the VAR review - should only be used to determine position i.e. offside or out of bounds, fishy conversion of the suspension to a 1-year probation), I think justice was probably done in the end. To me, it was serious enough for a red card, but not serious enough for a 1-game suspension.
I haven't kept up with the commentary on this, but I'm sure people are upset Trump got involved.I can't get over how mad a certain group of Americans are that an American player has been ruled eligible to play soccer tonight.
If politics have overtaken your life to the point where you are not happy about this, it might be time to take a step back.
Given Belgium’s laborious whinging over this they really should never consider fielding an SEC football team.I’m kinda surprised they’re being such whiny beaches about this.
The suspension would’ve been a nice little advantage for them, but it got reviewed and fixed. Move the 17 on and play the game. They’re acting like something egregious happened to them.
By the rule - it is. My point is - change the rule.We can debate the USA red card all day. Even top referees disagree on that one. The one on Quanseh is as clear cut as it gets. His foot went over the ball because he came in high. If that's not a red card virtually nothing is.
But there is. Rule 27. FIFA has authority to suspend part or all of a player's suspension. This is at least the 3rd time they've used it for this World Cup. Nobody cried too hard when Renaldo wasn't suspended for the first 2 group stage games.edited to add: There is no mechanism at the World Cup for a red not to result in a suspension. Hence the dubious probation thing. That needs to be changed before the next one. As far as I know no league anywhere has that rule.
The womens team has been slightly absent.Liberals now hate soccer
They want that kind of situation out of the game, think targeting.By the rule - it is. My point is - change the rule.
I was talking about throwing the suspension out entirely when they judge that it's warranted. That's what happens when they do this in nearly every league I know of.But there is. Rule 27. FIFA has authority to suspend part or all of a player's suspension. This is at least the 3rd time they've used it for this World Cup. Nobody cried too hard when Renaldo wasn't suspended for the first 2 group stage games.
“reserve all options”. Is that a threat?
Oh no? Someone might question if FIFA is on the up and up? What will ever happen to their sterling reputation?Letter of the law, sure. But this is only going to increase the uproar. UEFA has condemned the suspended suspension, and the appearance of political interference. What a mess all the way around.
edited to add: There is no mechanism at the World Cup for a red not to result in a suspension. Hence the dubious probation thing. That needs to be changed before the next one. As far as I know no league anywhere has that rule.
Board done jumped the shark we fightin' about fifa.
Letter of the law, sure. But this is only going to increase the uproar. UEFA has condemned the suspended suspension, and the appearance of political interference. What a mess all the way around.
edited to add: There is no mechanism at the World Cup for a red not to result in a suspension. Hence the dubious probation thing. That needs to be changed before the next one. As far as I know no league anywhere has that rule.
I hate targeting as well when it's impossible to adjust due to the play. Like when you hit the crown of the helmet because the player ducked mid-flight.They want that kind of situation out of the game, think targeting.
Agree, it’s essentially the same thing.I hate targeting as well when it's impossible to adjust due to the play. Like when you hit the crown of the helmet because the player ducked mid-flight.
Pretty sure you matched it about 10 posts ago. You have the highest "level of crazy" of anyone on this board, and you do it over and over and over and over. You pick a post and then go on and on and on and on about how they should stop posting. Oh, the irony.I take it back. I’m going to tell you why you’re an idiot here and there, but my quick review says you’ve already posted 40 times in this thread alone.
I’ve got no intention of matching that level of crazy.
Not a bit uncomfortable for me
Where were these stories when Cristiano Renaldo was cleared to play in the first 2 group stage games?
Pretty sure you matched it about 10 posts ago. You have the highest "level of crazy" of anyone on this board, and you do it over and over and over and over. You pick a post and then go on and on and on and on about how they should stop posting. Oh, the irony.