Kustarica to UCLA

JASUN74

All-American
May 22, 2008
3,807
5,600
73
He will be used this season more than what supposedly his handlers were seeking for the first season. Too bad for him but again we now have funds to get the very elite for next season. I also believe we are fine with the group we have.
Paying a player that much money, you better believe I’d get my moneys worth. I don’t know if they promised him anything with his minutes, but he’d start and play 30 minutes a game this year getting ready for next season. lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

Major_Tom

Sophomore
Apr 16, 2010
889
143
36
If he did, that’s only your take. NOT your life. People’s circumstances are complicated and people value different things, not just money. Calling people stupid over a decision for their life is very judgmental and would seem to indicate that you don’t appreciate the nuances of life. I’m not attacking you. But stop and think before you judge people so harshly.
 
Jul 6, 2025
2,449
6,872
113

Comparison for a $6 million annual salary​

  • California: Approximately 13.3% state tax (before credits and other adjustments).
  • Kentucky: 3.5% state tax.
Difference: 9.8 percentage points.

On $12 million over two years, that difference is roughly:

  • California state tax: ≈ $1.6 million
  • Kentucky state tax: ≈ $420,000
  • Approximate savings by playing for a Kentucky team: ≈ $1.18 million in state income taxes alone (before accounting for jock taxes from away games and any tax credits).

  • Not sure this is correct but if so I could think of 1.2 million reasons not to chose UCLA

Plus iirc California has a special pro athlete type tax. Wonder if nil qualifies as a pro athlete for that rule?
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

rivercatinfl

All-Conference
Nov 21, 2012
2,163
2,126
97
Glad this drama is over. Best of luck to the kid. Would have liked him on the team but I didn’t like the minutes restriction or the 2 year deal with an opener after year one.
Pope is gonna land some good players this year via recruitment and have a chance to get quality guys.
 

UKBB4Ever

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
2,190
3,822
113
I still feel like we don't really have a handle on how this money is being procured, allocated, etc.. or at least I don't. I'm not sure if we really had $12mil laying around to be handed out for this guy, or if we were going to have to pull it from somewhere. It seems unlikely we would have planned to spend say $20mil, and only used up say $13mil. I have a feeling to get this money for Kusturica, we were going to have to get some sort of "cash advance".

That's purely speculation on my part, but we have heard other schools are spending far too much, and are going to be in serious debt very soon.
The money is there for Pope. Always has been.

JMI as a problem was a matt jones made up story.

JMI has a Pope problem. Pope doesn’t have a JMI problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kyhankypanky

moses1uk

All-Conference
Jun 16, 2005
1,126
1,996
113
If he did, that’s only your take. NOT your life. People’s circumstances are complicated and people value different things, not just money. Calling people stupid over a decision for their life is very judgmental and would seem to indicate that you don’t appreciate the nuances of life. I’m not attacking you. But stop and think before you judge people so harshly.
I said stupid to the fact hell no he didn’t take less money . Stfu now
 

BigBluefoot

All-American
Jul 4, 2025
1,911
7,030
113
6 million a year and demanding limited playing minutes?
No thanks.
We always think these Euro dudes are the next Dirk Nowalski.(sp?) And they are seldomly good enough to demand that much money.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Littlecreek10

KOF98

Junior
Apr 10, 2025
181
306
63
People on this forum are social media illiterate and would literally fall for anything. A new account with zero followers posting the dumbest fake news ever ensnares like 80% of the people in these threads. Demonstrates why fake news is so effective.
 
Jan 27, 2024
342
625
62

Comparison for a $6 million annual salary​

  • California: Approximately 13.3% state tax (before credits and other adjustments).
  • Kentucky: 3.5% state tax.
Difference: 9.8 percentage points.

On $12 million over two years, that difference is roughly:

  • California state tax: ≈ $1.6 million
  • Kentucky state tax: ≈ $420,000
  • Approximate savings by playing for a Kentucky team: ≈ $1.18 million in state income taxes alone (before accounting for jock taxes from away games and any tax credits).

  • Not sure this is correct but if so I could think of 1.2 million reasons not to chose UCLA
Excellent post- I am also curious regarding the $$$ when you include local and county taxes....
 

TeamAmerica

All-American
Jul 3, 2025
1,542
5,096
113
If it was just about saving taxes all the best players would choose to go play at a Florida. Texas or TN program.
That is why the NFL Players Association wants to only play the Super Bowl in Non or Law Tax States. Some Seahawks had to pay more in taxes to California than they made playing in the game.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

BlueSince92

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2025
10,920
3,671
230
With the international talent pool opening up to NCAA basketball and the amount of money we can spend, is there not another guy who could have a bigger immediate impact? I know Kusturica is super talented, but he's extremely young. Seems we like we could use that money to find an older guy to fit our specific needs? Is that even an option at this point?
This is what I’ve felt all along. Dude has generally been a mediocre-at-best outside shooter since his growth spurt and shooting guard is literally the only thing we need help with this year. People got high on him hitting “40% of his three point shots at FIBA” but that is a grand total of nine shots going in, all of them against 17-and-under players shoved together three weeks previously and playing who knows how much defense—and four of those nine total perimeter shots that went in were in a single game where he got really hot and shot 50%. For the whole rest of the FIBA tournament and was only shooting 30% from outside. And for the whole time he played professionally since his growth spurt he shot way worse than that.

I’m not saying he’s terrible. And if we do manage to land him with a two-year deal then he will most likely be really, really good for us his second year. He’s projected that high for a reason. I just don’t think there are a whole lot of empirical, non-hot-air reasons to think he will help us a whole lot this year the only way we’d really need him to help us. So if we don’t land him I’m not going to lose any sleep.

And if, as you discussed, we happen to land someone in place of him who is more of what we actually need this year despite maybe being however much less exciting from a projected-lottery-pick angle, I personally will be very happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyBlue

Littlecreek10

Senior
Jul 6, 2025
210
416
63
So now you've got parents/handlers telling coaches how much playing time their kid is going to get? I'd say "no thanks" to that. This is another reason college basketball almost dead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigBluefoot

UKgrad22

All-Conference
Apr 9, 2026
581
1,488
93
He had 37 and 9 against USA today. If Pope was ever going to round up donors to up an offer for a kid, it better be him
 

Im The Village Idiot

All-Conference
Sep 7, 2025
1,580
4,261
113
lol, my phone autocorrected it to that too. But the kid is a legit prospect worth every dollar!
I tried to make a funny. Joke didn’t land haha.

And I don’t have my hopes up for the kid, honestly. Mirglip Kcaj seems to think we are dead in the water — heard nothing Kentucky for a long time and all UCLA. If we get him, we get him but I fully plan on him playing for Cronie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKgrad22

Runt#1969

All-American
Dec 13, 2010
21,349
8,992
113
I'm fine with him going to UCLA, in the end. Would still love to have him play here as good as he is tagged to be.

But if you ask me, how great is that going to make next year's UCLA team ? A ten minute restriction per game to play at all this year ?? ok....

How well is that if UCLA loses and the fans are wanting him to play more if he's good, he should make a difference. How well is that if UCLA does well and so does he, but say, averages a 10/5/2 split in thoise ten minutes?

I'd personally find it hilarious at that point. Just to see how Cronin "handles" it. He doesn't handle things well sometimes.....

so how well and big of an impact is he going to be playing ten minutes per game for THAT UCLA roster, and in the Big 10 next year ?

Maybe this is more of a payoff for his year 2.

Whatever. Still overpriced and overvalued until I will see him. Maybemaybe he is worth it, but it still seems like a stretch. Not worth that much money. There are bigger fish to land out there.