It looks NUTS there, lol. What a goal by Quinones and the 17 year old is the real deal.After an hour weather delay what a great start to this match and what an incredible atmosphere at Azteca!!!
Ohhhhhhhhhhh PUTO!!!!
It looks NUTS there, lol. What a goal by Quinones and the 17 year old is the real deal.After an hour weather delay what a great start to this match and what an incredible atmosphere at Azteca!!!
Ohhhhhhhhhhh PUTO!!!!
NHL has never done that in the playoffs and I don't think they ever will. Sudden death OT playoff games are one of the most special parts of hockey. I hate PK's too, but maybe there's a middle ground. Decide elimination games by PKs in the round of 32, but then maybe let them play an hour of OT in the round of 16 and the quarters followed by PKs and then 90 minutes in the semis followed by PKs and finally no PKs at all in the final match (with extra subs allowed the longer the games are).No NHL had gone to 3x3 skaters but not sure if they still do it
I’d certainly allow subs for each OT and shorten to 10 min each
We have to do anything other than end with PKs
This is an even worse idea...lol.NHL has never done that in the playoffs and I don't think they ever will. Sudden death OT playoff games are one of the most special parts of hockey. I hate PK's too, but maybe there's a middle ground. Decide elimination games by PKs in the round of 32, but then maybe let them play an hour of OT in the round of 16 and the quarters followed by PKs and then 90 minutes in the semis followed by PKs and finally no PKs at all in the final match (with extra subs allowed the longer the games are).
If you're willing to let them play indefinitely, I think you have to allow unlimited substitution at each interval, including return of players previously subbed out.
I got one that makes the purists throw up: the old NASL shootout.This is an even worse idea...lol.
I'm not sure Paraguay learned that from the US match, its exactly how they played during qualifying. The US just made them uncomfortable and pulled them out of shape.As a long-time Germany fan (I'm half German and they were the first World Cup team I rooted for since the US didn't generally qualify back in the day), this and recent WC teams are not vintage German teams. Germany should be able to get by Paraguay, but I'm not entirely surprised by yesterday's result and I wouldn't put this team in the European power category.
I think Paraguay learned a lot from the US game about how they needed to play going forward. They were incredibly organized and disciplined defensively which frustrated Germany to no end. Germany definitely needs that next infusion of young talent with the "it" factor, or at least the killer instinct when it comes to finishing which the best German teams always had in the past. At least my full, undivided attention can now be focused on the U.S.
Klopp w the best line on if that was a foul Arsenal would lose 60% of their goal, or something like thatContinued enforcement of this rule will eliminate some of the pre-corner kick nonsense. But they also need to weed out the WWE garbage pre corner kick in the rest of the box.
We've already seen less Oscar worthy diving due to the mistaken ID rule where VAR can intervene. Huge positive for the game. Continued enforcement on these things will bring the skill back into the game where it means something.
Fair point - nhl only did in regular season and scoring a hockey goal is easier than in soccer - just look at scoring averagesNHL has never done that in the playoffs and I don't think they ever will. Sudden death OT playoff games are one of the most special parts of hockey. I hate PK's too, but maybe there's a middle ground. Decide elimination games by PKs in the round of 32, but then maybe let them play an hour of OT in the round of 16 and the quarters followed by PKs and then 90 minutes in the semis followed by PKs and finally no PKs at all in the final match (with extra subs allowed the longer the games are).
That was more interesting than what they are doing now!I got one that makes the purists throw up: the old NASL shootout.
I sort of liked it, but got crushed for it on this board a while back.More interesting than what they are soin
That was more interesting than what they are doing now!
I actually prefer that to the PK shootout, as the shooter and goalkeeper are on more of an equal footing. It is analogous to the penalty shot in hockey.I got one that makes the purists throw up: the old NASL shootout.
I always thought the same. It tests the skills of the shooter and GK equally.I actually prefer that to the PK shootout, as the shooter and goalkeeper are on more of an equal footing. It is analogous to the penalty shot in hockey.
He can whine all he wants but FIFA made it a point of emphasis for the referees & VAR. It was explained to all the teams as well pre-tournament. So just sour grapes on his part.Klopp w the best line on if that was a foul Arsenal would lose 60% of their goal, or something like that
Yeah, I agree, they have done a good job. I only saw the printed text so didn't get so much get that he was whining as much as pointing out Premier League watchers have been seeing bodying the goalie allowed for a couple years now. My Spurs goalie, Vicario, struggled mightly with it a couple years ago trying to get used to the physicality on corners.He can whine all he wants but FIFA made it a point of emphasis for the referees & VAR. It was explained to all the teams as well pre-tournament. So just sour grapes on his part.
Let’s face it, FIFA, which it’s easy to hate on them, has done a good job with eliminating much of the time wasting that hurt the game and trying to eliminate stuff like this and it’s made the games much better to watch IMO.
That was more interesting than what they are doing now!I got one that makes the purists throw up: the old NASL shootout.
Doesn't get any more exciting than Carlos Alberto and Franz Beckenbauer converting vs. Minnesota in the 1978 playoffs.That actually makes a lot more sense than the current putrid format.
Well I spoke too soon. Belgium scores in the 85th & 89th minute to tie it up.Looks like USA will get Senegal if we get past B&H.
This is better than what they do now for sureSaw an interesting video with a different PK idea.
Have PKs immediately after full time.
Winner of PK gets a 0.5 goal advantage going into standard 30min extra time.
Example:
Belgium and Congo full time is tied 2-2
Belgium wins PKs
Extra time starts: Belgium winning 2.5 to 2.
Forces Congo to play aggressive.
If Belgium wants to park the bus - they need to do it for 30min against an attacking offense.
Game cant end in a tie because one team will always be up by 0.5 goal after any score.
Makes PKs a factor in the outcome but still gives the teams themselves the final opportunity.
Agreed, as he has been dangerous the few times he had the ball, but BH is spending more defense on preventing Pulisic from getting the ball, so it might be tough unless he comes inside more.USA by far the better team but we need more than 1 SOG
would like to see them use the left side more and get Pulisic more involved as it seems most is going down the right
I'm sure many purists will hate it, but I kind of like it.Saw an interesting video with a different PK idea.
Have PKs immediately after full time.
Winner of PK gets a 0.5 goal advantage going into standard 30min extra time.
Example:
Belgium and Congo full time is tied 2-2
Belgium wins PKs
Extra time starts: Belgium winning 2.5 to 2.
Forces Congo to play aggressive.
If Belgium wants to park the bus - they need to do it for 30min against an attacking offense.
Game cant end in a tie because one team will always be up by 0.5 goal after any score.
Makes PKs a factor in the outcome but still gives the teams themselves the final opportunity.
This. And need our Goalie to stop kicking out of bounds on the long kicks.USA by far the better team but we need more than 1 SOG
would like to see them use the left side more and get Pulisic more involved as it seems most is going down the right