If it needs to be explained to you end of discussion.He ignored WR, LB, and DT? How so?
If it needs to be explained to you end of discussion.He ignored WR, LB, and DT? How so?
The insistence of featuring small highly athletic DTs plagued the defense throughout most of Franklin’s tenure. Mustipher was an exception (never the same again after the injury), but other than him it was mostly smaller athletic DTs. That style worked very well to beat lesser competition, but if stronger conference opponents wanted to run the ball down our throats nearly every down to put us away like Michigan in 2023 or Illinois in 2021, they could do so. We always feared in big games we would start wearing down in the fourth quarter. The twitchy guys are fine if paired with a large DT.Ignored may not be the right word but failed or underperformed could be the right label. Ever since Parker Washington we have not had a productive WR so that is 3 years. LB has been middling and we saw the collapse with Rojas going down. Not great depth. DTs same story, inability to get a good pass rush or make disruptive plays, average.
I wasn’t talking to you, sophomore.If it needs to be explained to you end of discussion.
He's on ignore by a number of posters.BTW......you probably could care less. But why do you resort to name calling other posters. "Morons"?? Not cool my friend.
What I disagree with is the name calling. We can all have our opinions. Disagreement is no reason to label someone a "moron".You don't agree that those who thought Freeman, Cignetti or DeBoer were coming here are "special needs" fans?
I think it's fair since I didn't specify an individual. In fairness (to your criticism) there are 2 or 3 here than qualify. So, I wear the guilt.
Franklin won the conference in 3. I don't see HCMC getting more than that in this era of "college football." I'd like someone to wager that if "excellence at the highest level" and the "NC our fans deserve" are not achieved by year 12 that either will be at PSU.Does he not get a dozen years to find out?
Of course I understand that the every major school has an Addidas or Nike deal but the PSU deal was quite large. That might be because it's one of the newest. It's probably also because PSU has a top 10 fan base which should get them a better deal with outfits like Addidas than most schools.Every school has a Addidas or Nike agreement. This does not set PSU above the top 10 spenders. Why would Addidas give PSU a better offer than it would be willing to give OSU or UM? Oregon is flush with NIke bucks.
It comes down to NIL money. PSU is not in the top 10. Perhaps not even 15. This was not the appropriate time to build luxury boxes. Too much on the landscape of college football is unsettled. The donations could have put more talent on the field.
Good news, my friend. The redo has been scaled back. It is now $700 million.Of course I understand that the every major school has an Addidas or Nike deal but the PSU deal was quite large. That might be because it's one of the newest. It's probably also because PSU has a top 10 fan base which should get them a better deal with outfits like Addidas than most schools.
I agree that I would have liked to see the $700 billion stadium redo scaled back to $500 billion with the other $200 billion going towards players. $200 billion would provide a lot of NIL money for a decade or so. Unfortunately I don't think it works that way. Donors would prefer to sponsor a facility with a long lifespan instead of an unproven player who will be gone in a few years. I also don't think it's legal. The university can only spend $20.5 million directly and I don't know the rules for direct donor payments to athletes. Besides, PSU doesn't have $700 million for stadium renovations. They're borrowing most of the money and expect to make it back over time with higher revenues from tickets, suites, and other events. I think they've "only" received $50-$100 million or so in donations (Misitano Family, Founders, etc) so the rest is being financed.
I think Bacon and Campbell are both a seniors so neither are part of a long term rebuilding plan. It would have been nice to have both players this fall because Rojas is the only other highly rated LB and who knows how he'll be after surgery.What LB did we get that you are referring to? Bacon?
That's how I've felt from the beginning but the problem isn't that our stadium is too nice. It's that you can only get so much from the donors.There is a limit on how much those wealthy donors are willing to give. Money going to one purpose isn't going to another.
PSU has an uphill battle trying to match the amount of money some other schools are able to raise but I think they should be able to hang around 15th.No way PSU will get more money than other big programs.
If you believe the folks at PSU who were promoting the Adidas/PlayFly etc deals, and accepted all that at face value, then you believe that PSU got a "deal" that was orders of magnitude more profitable than deals for the likes of Ohio State (and anyone else).Of course I understand that the every major school has an Addidas or Nike deal but the PSU deal was quite large. That might be because it's one of the newest. It's probably also because PSU has a top 10 fan base which should get them a better deal with outfits like Addidas than most schools.
You don't agree that those who thought Freeman, Cignetti or DeBoer were coming here are "special needs" fans?
I think it's fair since I didn't specify an individual. In fairness (to your criticism) there are 2 or 3 here than qualify. So, I wear the guilt.
Sure but you can say that about every position. Who’s going to throw the ball? Who’s going to catch the ball? Who’s going to run the ball? Who’s going to lock down opposing WRs? Who’s going to shut down the run game? We got a lot of those answers. I do hope we can land some quality edges. But don’t act like we aren’t taking care of things pretty much all around. Remember, BGJ ignored WRs, LBs, and DTs for years which contributed to his team imploding when it did.
Ohio State's deal with Nike, at about $16.5 million per year, was signed ten years ago. Landscape has changed. Nike is retrenching and Adidas is simply throwing money around. Was Penn State lucky to be on the receiving end? Maybe. If so, how much is in cash?If you believe the folks at PSU who were promoting the Adidas/PlayFly etc deals, and accepted all that at face value, then you believe that PSU got a "deal" that was orders of magnitude more profitable than deals for the likes of Ohio State (and anyone else).
Did you believe that?
Your concerns expressed wrt all of the other financials are likely well-founded, and cause for even more significant concern.
Partially. A couple of years ago Sports Illustrated did a study to determine the largest fan bases:If you believe the folks at PSU who were promoting the Adidas/PlayFly etc deals, and accepted all that at face value, then you believe that PSU got a "deal" that was orders of magnitude more profitable than deals for the likes of Ohio State (and anyone else).
Did you believe that?
Did he ignore those positions or did he just lose the recruiting battles?Remember, BGJ ignored WRs, LBs, and DTs for years which contributed to his team imploding when it did.
Kemajou, Granville, and Arrington are sophomores. Burnett, Reeder, and Ford are freshmen. We should be OK at DE if we can hold these kids.No. You can't say it about every position. When a school has 4 CB commits and 0 DE commits it is not the same. CB is a question mark. DE is a HOLE.
Ford is going to be a beast. He looked impressive in spring and he is already sized to play at a college level coming in at 240 and already at 252 through the s&c program. Reeder, a super athlete dual sport guy, has potential to be elite too, just needs to grow into his frame with a year of s&c.Kemajou, Granville, and Arrington are sophomores. Burnett, Reeder, and Ford are freshmen. We should be OK at DE if we can hold these kids.
I wanted Campbell to stay but Amare wanted extreme money (more than the mill on the table) and the staff were unwilling to give more as they had to reconstruct a team. Rojas took his deal despite overtures from Miami because his heart is here at PSU. Some of you are addicted to numerical ratings. Amare got a final transfer portal rating of 0.91 and Bacon got a 0.93 from 247. Amare was more consistent than most on the defense, but still our defense got gassed up the middle much of the season last year.I think Bacon and Campbell are both a seniors so neither are part of a long term rebuilding plan. It would have been nice to have both players this fall because Rojas is the only other highly rated LB and who knows how he'll be after surgery.
My guess is that coach would have liked both players but he couldn't justify paying Campbell more than Bacon. There has to be some parity or you risk conflict between players.
Why? Because they didn't have to.Partially. A couple of years ago Sports Illustrated did a study to determine the largest fan bases:
Why wouldn't Addidas be willing to pay top dollar to gain access to the #4 fan base in the country? You asked why PSU would expect a deal orders of magnitude greater than OSU. They wouldn't but I would expect them to get a very good top 10 deal. The other thing is that the value of these deals goes up just like coaches salaries. The next big contract is typically higher than the previous big contract. PSU's deal with Nike expired and they got one of the newer deals.
- OSU
- Notre Dame
- Texas
- Penn state
- Michigan
- Oregon
- Florida
- Alabama
- Wisconsin
- USC
New study reveals biggest fan bases in college football
I'm not sure what you're saying. It sounds like you think PSU only got a middle of the road deal in spite of having one of the biggest fan bases.Why? Because they didn't have to.
Let me be perfectly clear: Adidas did not have to pay Penn State $30 million a year.I'm not sure what you're saying. It sounds like you think PSU only got a middle of the road deal in spite of having one of the biggest fan bases.
Psu probably backed off cignetti since he ignored dt. Only had one dt over 305 lbs.
Not PSU materialPsu probably backed off cignetti since he ignored dt. Only had one dt over 305 lbs.
The kid from Colorado is spose to be pretty good as well, wish Arrington would have red shirted he needs to gain weight if he want's to make an impact at DE.Kemajou, Granville, and Arrington are sophomores. Burnett, Reeder, and Ford are freshmen. We should be OK at DE if we can hold these kids.
I think you are correct. However, that doesn't play well if you want to be a top 5 program. I've said for several years now, there is a segment of the fanbase that likes to think PSU is a top 5 program. They just aren't. Unless something drastically changes, the average finish will be 10-15. There will be years like 2024 (5) and years of 7-5, 8-4.PSU has an uphill battle trying to match the amount of money some other schools are able to raise but I think they should be able to hang around 15th.
That's fine. I'm glad no one has attacked me.What I disagree with is the name calling. We can all have our opinions. Disagreement is no reason to label someone a "moron".
Depends what you call "middle of the road".I'm not sure what you're saying. It sounds like you think PSU only got a middle of the road deal in spite of having one of the biggest fan bases.
You talk like you were in the room.Let me be perfectly clear: Adidas did not have to pay Penn State $30 million a year.
Are YOU waiting until Campbell coaches his first game before casting aspersions? If you feel the need to go around telling people they can’t comment until Campbell coaches a game, you going to abide?No. You can't say it about every position. When a school has 4 CB commits and 0 DE commits it is not the same. CB is a question mark. DE is a HOLE.
. You might want to wait for Big Game Campbell to actually coach a game before you build a statue. He has one LB and one WR.
No need to be in the room. Grand Canyon is pretty hard to miss.You talk like you were in the room.
Are YOU waiting until Campbell coaches his first game before casting aspersions? If you feel the need to go around telling people they can’t comment until Campbell coaches a game, you going to abide?
Whether it’s because BGJ ignored LB, DT, and WR recruiting for the last few years or simply swung and missed makes no difference. We were dangerously thin at those positions and he wasn’t filling them. And that’s one of the several reasons the team imploded.
It's very difficult to be a top 5 program but I think PSU had all the makings of a perennial top 10 program until NIL hit. We used to be able to sell recruits on education and the amazing fan base. Now it's mostly the money and I agree that there are 10 teams ahead of us that will be difficult to ever match.I think you are correct. However, that doesn't play well if you want to be a top 5 program. I've said for several years now, there is a segment of the fanbase that likes to think PSU is a top 5 program. They just aren't. Unless something drastically changes, the average finish will be 10-15. There will be years like 2024 (5) and years of 7-5, 8-4.
Oregon and Ohio State are just better programs. Better funded so they can win in the recruiting process and the portal.
If Cignetti is indeed an all time coaching genius then that's the 3rd conference team with an edge.
That puts PSU in with Michigan, USC and perhaps Washington jockeying for position each year in the conference. Forgive me for having difficulty seeing excellence at the highest level.
Because I said none of that, I have to assume you have some sort of addiction to lying. Or you’re just a troll.No. The difference is I concede the future is unknown. You on the other hand already think the recruiting class is elite, staff elite, system is elite and so on. Campbell is already cignetti???
We all know about UCLA's pay-for-play when John Wooden was the HC.Coach Wooden had a secret weapon ....a guy by the name of Gilbert. You can look it up.