Police reports state facts like injuries and witness statements. Sounds like you only give the benefit of the doubt in one direction…Wow, quick to rush to judgement . Sadly , that’s what happens in DV cases . Once the finger gets pointed at the guy, guilty until proven innocent .
This. I guess Plum has never read a police report or affidavit.Police reports state facts like injuries and witness statements. Sounds like you only give the benefit of the doubt in one direction…
Police reports are not infallible, nor are witness statements. A trial would help determine the validity of that stuff.This. I guess Plum has never read a police report or affidavit.
Based on this article, I don’t know how anybody can reach a firm conclusion about the dude’s guilt or innocence. Based on the police report, there is ample evidence to arrest. There’s a strong indication of violence. But until there’s a trial with it’s rules of evidence and procedure, or a plea, we have no idea what actually happened.
I haven’t read the report on this specific case because I don’t give a ****, but I think it’s weird when people need a trial to conclude something. The bar for criminal conviction is and should be very high. I certainly don’t need to have that high a bar to personally conclude someone is an *******Police reports are not infallible, nor are witness statements. A trial would help determine the validity of that stuff.
If police reports are infallible why are people found not guilty at criminal trials?Police reports state facts like injuries and witness statements. Sounds like you only give the benefit of the doubt in one direction…
I haven't read many police reports but if I read this one correctly, he had not been drinking.Drinking and a temper never mesh well.
I try to avoid judging people based purely off what the media reports. And, like I said, police reports and witness statements can be highly misleading.I haven’t read the report on this specific case because I don’t give a ****, but I think it’s weird when people need a trial to conclude something. The bar for criminal conviction is and should be very high. I certainly don’t need to have that high a bar to personally conclude someone is an *******
Same with witnesses. They can be notoriously unreliable at times.If police reports are infallible why are people found not guilty at criminal trials?![]()
Nothing really. But we don't have anything to gain by analyzing how much Cam Spencer should shoot or whether Paul dribbles too much either. For us that are not personally connected to the events that are happening it is just entertainment.What do we (here on the forum, or as a society in general) have to gain by prejudging the people involved?
If police reports are worthless, why do them? (Insert lame emoji)If police reports are infallible why are people found not guilty at criminal trials?![]()
I would argue that, as fans of RUMBB, we are more personally connected to how the RU players perform in games than to what some guy in TX did or didn’t do in his personal life, no?Nothing really. But we don't have anything to gain by analyzing how much Cam Spencer should shoot or whether Paul dribbles too much either. For us that are not personally connected to the events that are happening it is just entertainment.
Nobody said they are worthless. Fallible does not mean worthless.If police reports are worthless, why do them? (Insert lame emoji)
You’re agreeing with me. I clearly responded to someone who outright dismissed them.Nobody said they are worthless. Fallible does not mean worthless.
They can be very useful, when combined with other supporting evidence, both to the prosecution and defense.
Yes, true.I would argue that, as fans of RUMBB, we are more personally connected to how the RU players perform in games than to what some guy in TX did or didn’t do in his personal life, no?
I don't want to lynch anybody. I just think that the idea of applying criminal standards to personal opinion is odd.When it was one of our players, we had more of a legitimate interest. I recall when one of the RUFB receivers (Caroo maybe?) got in trouble because his GF, or ex-GF or whatever, had accused him of assaulting her outside the athletic center. It looked pretty bad with some witness statements. Everybody here was leaping to judge the kid. I was saying maybe we ought to wait and see what an investigation reveals and that we ought not judge the kid until all the facts are in.
Turned out it was apparently some other kid that did the assault and the ex-GF wanted to drop the charges and ultimately refused to testify. Eventually the case was dropped due to a lack of evidence.
We complained when TN fans and boosters started accusing Schiano of somehow being involved with the whole Sandusky mess at PSU. They had no evidence, but were leaping on the Schiano was involved bandwagon anyway.
It seems to be a characteristic of human nature for people to form metaphorical lynch mobs very rapidly. I guess, while I’m not telling others what they should do, I’m just not a personally a fan of that aspect of our nature.
I think anybody who abuses their spouse or kids or pets is a ****** excuse for a human and should get tossed in prison. I just want to be pretty certain they did it before I start judging them is all.
You’re reaching big time because you’re viewpoint is rather narrow.You’re agreeing with me. I clearly responded to someone who outright dismissed them.
Good lord - love to know what my narrow viewpoint is as opposed to your worldly view. I’m saying you can’t discount the initial reports and a message board is an appropriate place for speculation and conjecture - I’m not on the freaking jury. I’m this case, it sounds pretty bad based on initial reports - hardly “reaching big time”.You’re reaching big time because you’re viewpoint is rather narrow.
They are documentation of events but are not the end all be all. What witnesses recall can change or be disputed; what is documented can be distorted, accidentally or not, by the officer; new evidence can turn up; etc.
It’s why there is a judiciary to hear the evidence & rebuttal. If the police report were infallible there would be no need to have criminal judges.
Drinking and a temper never mesh well.
This. I guess Plum has never read a police report or affidavit.
I would argue that, as fans of RUMBB, we are more personally connected to how the RU players perform in games than to what some guy in TX did or didn’t do in his personal life, no?
When it was one of our players, we had more of a legitimate interest. I recall when one of the RUFB receivers (Caroo maybe?) got in trouble because his GF, or ex-GF or whatever, had accused him of assaulting her outside the athletic center. It looked pretty bad with some witness statements. Everybody here was leaping to judge the kid. I was saying maybe we ought to wait and see what an investigation reveals and that we ought not judge the kid until all the facts are in.
Turned out it was apparently some other kid that did the assault and the ex-GF wanted to drop the charges and ultimately refused to testify. Eventually the case was dropped due to a lack of evidence.
We complained when TN fans and boosters started accusing Schiano of somehow being involved with the whole Sandusky mess at PSU. They had no evidence, but were leaping on the Schiano was involved bandwagon anyway.
It seems to be a characteristic of human nature for people to form metaphorical lynch mobs very rapidly. I guess, while I’m not telling others what they should do, I’m just not a personally a fan of that aspect of our nature.
I think anybody who abuses their spouse or kids or pets is a ****** excuse for a human and should get tossed in prison. I just want to be pretty certain they did it before I start judging them is all.
Plumb didn’t nail the Caroo thing. Mildone nailed it and you read what I wrote and copied it. Plum gets credit for recognizing the brilliance of Mildone and nothing more.We will see . Funny that carroo case is mentioned . I am the one that originally told this Board how it was gonna go down . Plum nailed that one . Why would anyone doubt now ??
We will see how the beard situation shakes out. My guess is that beard won’t look too bad at the end . Then we can bump this post forever and ever.
Plum is gonna nail this one….again .
Or most any case, not just domestic violence. The presumption of innocence and the heightened burden to prove crimes apply in the courtroom to a jury, not outside of it. Such is life. Most of us have made quick, informal judgments, even if subconsciously. Good luck fighting that battle.Wow, quick to rush to judgement . Sadly , that’s what happens in DV cases . Once the finger gets pointed at the guy, guilty until proven innocent .
Reasonable take. I agree, whether right or wrong, the backlash may lead Texas to pursue other options. What a mess.We will have to see whether Beard's lawyer is right in saying that the woman wants the charges dropped. If she does, and if the prosecutor goes along, then there will never be a trial. Complainants in cases like these often want charges dropped for a variety of reasons -- wanting the charges dropped doesn't necessarily show that she thinks the defendant did nothing wron. Often the complainant doesn't want the hassle of a trial in which she's going to be cross-examined about pretty intimate matters. His claim seems to be that he "was not the primary aggressor," but he has declined to share the audio recordings which he says prove that. He doesn't seem to be claiming that the encounter was consensual, nor denying that the woman was injured or that he caused the injuries. He might well get fired for that alone regardless of how the prosecution plays out.
Plum nailed this one !!!This. I guess Plum has never read a police report or affidavit.
Not only did plum nail it ! Plum tells everyone he will nail it !!We will see . Funny that carroo case is mentioned . I am the one that originally told this Board how it was gonna go down . Plum nailed that one . Why would anyone doubt now ??
We will see how the beard situation shakes out. My guess is that beard won’t look too bad at the end . Then we can bump this post forever and ever.
Plum is gonna nail this one….again .
Don’t care that much about this, but if this makes your day, have fun.Plum nailed this one !!!
Statement really doesn’t prove much. Could’ve been a nice settlement reached with his attorneys, who knows?Not only did plum nail it ! Plum tells everyone he will nail it !!
Merry Christmas to all !!!
Plum nails it again !! Merry Christmas !Police reports state facts like injuries and witness statements. Sounds like you only give the benefit of the doubt in one direction…
I really hope this is shtick for you, otherwise pretty pathetic. No Merry Christmas for you!Plum nails it again !! Merry Christmas !
Good lord - love to know what my narrow viewpoint is as opposed to your worldly view. I’m saying you can’t discount the initial reports and a message board is an appropriate place for speculation and conjecture - I’m not on the freaking jury. I’m this case, it sounds pretty bad based on initial reports - hardly “reaching big time”.
Yes, it’s shtick !!I really hope this is shtick for you, otherwise pretty pathetic. No Merry Christmas for you!
The Knight Report
Rutgers Baseball Transfer Portal Profile: C/1B Nick Shuhet
The Knight Report
Join The Knight Report TODAY and get it for 60% off!
The Knight Report
RU Football survey results: Fans share thoughts on Greg Schiano, Defense, & Direction of Program
The Knight Report
Brandin Knight takes over Rutgers basketball while Steve Pikiell battles cancer
High School Football
Prediction: Can Bergen Catholic (N.J.) run the table in the 2nd half of the season?